Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clown porn

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:10, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Clown porn (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List of pop culture references disguised as a stub. KMF (talk) 00:48, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2017 September 26. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:04, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:46, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Popular culture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The article asserts the existence of something called "clown porn", which it describes as "a variety of pornography in which the performers dress as clowns", and lists pop culture references to "clown porn" but fails to establish that "clown porn" is actually a thing. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 02:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Girls say they want a guy who is funny and spontaneous but when I tap on the window at night dressed as a clown it's all panic and screaming...... (PS Delete as fails GNG) .... –Fuckles The Clown 20:43, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- a non encyclopedic collection of trivia; fails WP:NOT. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:31, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete concept not supported by WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.