Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gadsen Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. LFaraone 00:36, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gadsen Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability. Sourced by things that are not about them, that don't mention them . Notability is not inherited from who they don't work with. duffbeerforme (talk) 14:08, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:26, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 03:01, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

• Keep, enough secondary source coverage here to warrant retention, and quality improvement and cleanup of the page itself. — Cirt (talk) 16:02, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Where is the secondary source coverage about Gadsen? duffbeerforme (talk) 04:43, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • More information found on Gadsen under the umbrella label Organica Music Group. It all checks out. http://organicamusicgroup.com/our-artists ^[1]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.