Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jane Delfino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 13:10, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jane Delfino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBIO. Debatable that getting an MBE is a guarantee of notability. All the secondary sources I see provide only marginal or incidental coverage on her. Rogermx (talk) 16:22, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 19:08, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:20, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no WP:SIGCOV and I do not think an MBE in itself would quality someone as notable.Tacyarg (talk) 16:03, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete an unsourced biography of a living person.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:43, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, source added, haven't found SIGCOV to meet BASIC/GNG. PROD material, really. Sam Sailor 18:00, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.