Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judith Palache Gregory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:40, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Judith Palache Gregory (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 03:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I see enough coverage to justify keeping the article. An additional factor is that the article indirectly sheds light on Dorothy Day, a very notable figure, but with information that would be clutter in the Day bio. JamesMLane t c 04:07, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  04:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  04:15, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:43, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 23:48, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep The subject of the article passes GNG. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:17, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. More than enough sources justifying GNG.--Ipigott (talk) 08:55, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep there are a lot of non-independent sources which probably need to be trimmed, but the first three sources look solid enough for me. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - clearly the subject of this article is notable as a writer, permaculturalist and educator. Netherzone (talk) 02:45, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - easily passes WP:GNG. Notability has been established. Antonioatrylia (talk) 09:42, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.