Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/K34HO-D

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. I just thought I'd add, due to the comment about an "ecosystem", that over the past 3 months, through PRODs and AFDs, we have deleted dozens of articles on these low power TV stations. So, this is just one of many articles in this subject area that have been deleted in 2023-2024. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:10, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

K34HO-D (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet the GNG. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep I freely admit to not understanding the subject matter, but there appears to whole Wikipedia ecosystem around these low power television stations that seem to bubble up for a few years, somemes as a notable station, e.g. Univision and sometimes not. It seems to me that keeping the whole of the system intact is a much better resource than one with holes in it. MNewnham (talk) 23:30, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Television and Minnesota. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 05:47, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete If there were an article on UHF-TV Inc., this would be a candidate to be redirected there. There isn't. Most coverage would be at the system level. As a "stack-lator", there is no appropriate redirect target. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 02:01, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:07, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Subject does not have the WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 14:36, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.