Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naved Masood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:47, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Naved Masood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is hard to find substantial coverage that could meet WP:GNG. The sources listed in the article do not provide WP:SIGCOV. Bakhtar40 (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Finance, and India. Bakhtar40 (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Doesn't seem to fit notability criteria for bureaucrats or notability in general.

Xoocit (talk) 10:10, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for the reasons noted above. Also, as an adjunct professor he fails WP:PROF. Bearian (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 08:05, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.