Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Papua New Guinea fixtures and results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. A well-done rescue. Per consensus below, article is helpful fork of the main article. Pastordavid (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Papua New Guinea fixtures and results

Delete are the collections of recitations of various teams' results in real and friendly competitions encyclopedic? There are several of this ilk, but I'll test float this one rather than risk a multiple nomination with a confused result. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:14, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete old article with only 1 result on it, nothing done to it since July last year. -- Ļıßζېấשּׂ~ۘ Ώƒ ﻚĢęخ (talk) 01:15, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Papua New Guinea national football team and redirect. --Bduke (talk) 05:03, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. -- Bduke (talk) 05:04, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:12, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with 2007 in Papua New Guinean football, if have one. Matthew_hk t c 08:27, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was going to say it should be kept in line with the AfD which finished the other day for the equivalent article(s) for Ireland, but as there's only one match listed I don't think it's worth keeping. Delete unless someone feels the urge to massively expand it..... ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:30, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing my !vote to keep now that someone (i.e. TerriersFan) has made a start on said expansion ChrisTheDude (talk) 23:47, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment see also to Denmark one Matthew_hk t c 08:33, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Year-by-year articles don't seem to work for national teams. пﮟოьεԻ 5 7 09:25, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, still not encyclopedic. Punkmorten (talk) 09:57, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, outdated BanRay 22:54, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep BanRay 00:58, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per recent discussion on Irish football results Peanut4 (talk) 22:37, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, even if I would agree with a merger as well. In any case, this stuff does not really deserve its own article. --Angelo (talk) 11:15, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete and important note Delete - essentially empty. However, this is not necessarily to be taken as a precedent for nominator's comments about other, similar articles. They need to be assessed on case-by-case basis. And judging by the nomination, my reasons for deletion differ utterly from the nominator's. --Dweller (talk) 12:56, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep No longer empty. Now encyclopedic, useful, notable, sourced... the works. --Dweller (talk) 10:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect per Bduke. Bearian'sBooties (talk) 18:52, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this does absolutely nothing to add to the encyclopedic coverage of football of wikipedia. Robotforaday (talk) 16:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - summary pages of national team results seem notable. We have England national football team results and many others. Plainly the page is pretty useless at the moment but that is a reason for tagging and expansion. TerriersFan (talk) 18:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I have now sourced and expanded the article. More coming! TerriersFan (talk) 19:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.