Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick J. McGinnis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:00, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick J. McGinnis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claim to notability appears to be that he had a small part in popularising a neologism. Everything else seems run of the mill and the refs don't help much - interviews, mentions etc. Nothing here establishes WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:17, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:06, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:07, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete -- notability not established. Likely an advert or an autobiography. Not notable as either "venture capitalist, author and speaker"; Wikipedia is not a speaker's bureau to help subjects book their speaking gigs. K.e.coffman (talk) 17:33, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - yet another guy who took 10 million dollars and made more, coining a neologism along the way to further riches. We are not Managed-fund-pedia. Essentially no reliable sourcing. Bearian (talk) 01:02, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.