Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pulaksagar

Pulaksagar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bio stub that was moved from draft despite minimal sourcing. I can’t see any reliable independent sources so bringing here for consensus.. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Religion and India. Mccapra (talk) 22:42, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: All I see is news coverage from Hindi local sources, with no significant coverage sources found. The subject fails to meet GNG. It was moved from the Draft space to the Main space because the draftification was done without consensus. Per WP:DRAFTNO, articles older than 90 days should not be draftified without discussion or consensus. GrabUp - Talk 04:29, 25 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - having a single source is essentially original research. Bearian (talk) 02:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - I added a ref. Please take a look at it; I'm unsure of the quality. It may be churnalism. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 04:55, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  @A. B.: Hi, just a heads-up— Medium is considered a blog and a user-generated source per WP:MEDIUM. I’ve reverted your edit accordingly. Hope this helps clarify! GrabUp - Talk 05:05, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks! --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 05:11, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]