Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Visitacion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ItsZippy ^{(talk • contributions)} 17:40, 12 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Visitacion (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is basically an unsourced BLP. The only source is IMDB which shows him with a total of 1 role--that of "Fighter/Robber". His kickboxing record is totally without sources. The only notable claim is a U.S. lightweight kickboxing championship (although the article says he was a welterweight) for an unnamed organization and this claim has no supporting evidence. Papaursa (talk) 03:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Papaursa (talk) 03:06, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:39, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete There are no reliable sources to support any claims of notability. I'm not sure he'd be notable even if the claims in the article were sourced, but he might be. As the article currently stands, it's an easy decision. Astudent0 (talk) 17:34, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete My search found no reliable sources to support any claims of notability. A few months ago another editor posted a request for sources for this article at the kickboxing task force's talk page and there's been no response there, either. Mdtemp (talk) 14:56, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.