Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rome Catholic School (Rome, New York)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snowman keep because it's way bigger than a snowball. (WP:NAC) flaminglawyer 08:04, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rome Catholic School (Rome, New York) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Not very notable school. There are plenty of famous schools in Wikipedia, private, public, or religious, either due to excellence or particular event. But this one does not claim any notability of the school, and just contains information that can be found almost in every high school in most countries. It is not yet for Wikipedia to have an article for this school. Wandering Courier (talk) 20:50, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep High schools are inherently notable. Mandsford (talk) 20:59, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note--I thought they weren't? (Not that I'm disagreeing with the 'keep.') Drmies (talk) 05:35, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Media coverage found on Google [1] confirms it is a notable school. Pastor Theo (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The standard for Wikipedia articles is not famous, merely notable. And there can almost always be found sufficient information to show that for a high school. DGG (talk) 01:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - sources are available to meet WP:ORG. No reason to delete. TerriersFan (talk) 04:46, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. I agree with the nominator that this "contains information that can be found almost in every high school in most countries". That's why almost every high school is notable. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:52, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein  22:52, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: I am relisting this AfD to ensure its exposure for at least five days after undoing an incorrect non-admin closure made on January 27th.  Sandstein  22:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep...I have made some changes and also contacted the principle to broaden the scope of the article, if possible. But should no further information be added, this school is still notable.--Buster7 (talk) 22:57, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Snowball keep Ikip (talk) 23:13, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per everyone but nominator. High schools are inherently notable. Edward321 (talk) 00:41, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Listed in enough school reviews (Google search) to meet WP:N and WP:NOTE

Something tells me that we won't need "five more days"... Mandsford (talk) 03:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.