Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell Curry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 10:11, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Russell Curry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACTOR--Соловьиная Роща (talk) 14:08, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers and Minnesota. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:52, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:11, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. He meets WP:NACTOR, with his notable roles in Another World, Santa Barbara, Guiding Light and Sunset Beach. He also meets WP:GNG from the sources found in Newspapers.com, Curry's in no hurry to become soap star (Sunday-The Daily News), Professional growing pains have eased for actor (The Flint Journal), Soap Notes (The Albuquerque Tribune) and 'Struggle Never Happened' (Victoria Advocate). Those four Newspapers.com sources shows that the article meets WP:GNG. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 06:46, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Thank you very much. I cannot verify his roles are all significant but in Sunset Beach, definitely so, and in Another World, I would tend to think so too, and given the coverage you provided (which I must confess I cannot open) and that seems both significant, independent and reliable, that makes two reasons to retain the page. (Note to closer: I don't !vote in bold because I can't access the text of the articles but I support the idea of keeping the page (:D). If that is not procedurally valid, ignore my input!) -Mushy Yank. 21:31, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Drive-by comment for MoviesandTelevisionFan: next time you share Newspapers.com articles, clip them so other people without subscriptions can see. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 06:12, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    I actually don't have access to clip Newspapers.com articles anymore. The only way I always see them is always changing the numbers in these links, since the Wikipedia Library doesn't have Newspapers.com available anymore in my library. Curry's in no hurry to become soap star (Sunday-The Daily News), Professional growing pains have eased for actor (The Flint Journal), Soap Notes (The Albuquerque Tribune) and 'Struggle Never Happened' (Victoria Advocate). These links now works for access once you're logged in through the Wikipedia Library. MoviesandTelevisionFan (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There is coverage, there are significant roles. BilboBeggins (talk) 20:55, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep per MoviesandTelevisionFan and the various sources they presented above. Although I would prefer if they could add these sources to the article in question (since it is currently unsourced and in desperate need of expansion). CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:43, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.