Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samastha (EK faction)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:35, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Samastha (EK faction)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article is a non notable organization Padavalam Kuttan Pilla Talk 00:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Padavalam Kuttan Pilla Talk 00:37, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If the faction is not independently notable it should be redirected to Samastha. ~ GB fan 00:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Kutyava (talk) 01:01, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Yunshui ^雲 _水 11:29, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 12:19, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – Only passing mentions. Fails GNG. Missvain (talk) 18:20, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
delete the subject fails notability criteria for organisations (NORG). For testing NORG, I applied the guidelines provided in WP:ORGCRIT (which in turn is a little stricter version of GNG). The subject also fails general notability criteria. —usernamekiran (talk) 16:14, 27 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.