View text source at Wikipedia


Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Telavox

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 08:35, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Telavox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. Fails GNG. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 21:48, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:02, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - The company is notable: The article has several references and one of them is from the "Radio Museum", a website available in five languaes with information about vintage radios. Its products (both radios and clocks) are collector items. An image search comes up with numerous images of its products.Ramblersen (talk) 18:05, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:04, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America1000 01:17, 15 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:19, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.