Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WeGoLook

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 03:13, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

WeGoLook

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails the general notability guideline as not the subject of significant coverage in reliable secondary sources.

The bulk of the article references are to reprints of company press releases or to aggregator websites that print anything they receive. Collectively these fail WP:CORPDEPTH and do not lend anything to the notability of the company as a whole.

There are two substantive reports - Huffington Post and Entrepreneur - but they are both profiles of the company's founder and her views on mentoring and personal success; they barely mention the company itself.

Please also note this, which suggests the article is intended as an advertisement, and not an encyclopedia page. -- Euryalus (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC) Euryalus (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:36, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 23:37, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only notable for the amount of press releases they can include as references. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 16:51, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As per Euryalus. Fails WP:GNG as I can find no independent information indicating notability. Reads like a business spiel. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The depth isn't there to sustain an article on the company. Maybe one on the founder though. - Bri (talk) 21:59, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can't find enough sources out there to satisfy GNG. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:04, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oklahoma-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:30, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Blatant WP:PROMO.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 20:26, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.