Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wiki-surfing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete for being that infamous game (Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day#That_infamous_game) yet again, with yet another set of people claiming to have invented it. Uncle G 23:48, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This topic has been created and deleted numerous times - including AfD's. It keeps showing up under new names. Feel free to speedy. Rklawton 20:22, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• But why does it keep being deleted? People actually play this game everyday. It is a tribute to the power and vastness of Wikipedia. Whilst it is clearly not the most intellectual of phenomenons, is does exist - so why should it be deleted? User:Bunglelivesinwoolpit 21:27, 27th July 2006
  • Because it is not a notable game outside of Wikipedia, and we strive to avoid self-references. Such games are, though, well documented at WP:FUN. -Goldom ‽‽‽ ⁂ 20:29, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Haakon 20:30, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom or Speedy delete as a re-creation. You know it's a bad sign when your article's main source is Urban Dictionary. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 21:24, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I agree with deleting it, especially if it's already listed in WP:FUN. --Natalie 21:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as recreated material. Again. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 23:37, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.