Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JJMC89 bot 13

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

Operator: JJMC89 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 05:42, Wednesday, July 26, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: inactive admins.py on GitHub

Function overview: Report and notify Wikipedia:Inactive administrators

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Request by xaosflux

Edit period(s): Daily

Estimated number of pages affected: 0-1 daily + # inactive admins semi-monthly

Namespace(s): User talk, Wikipedia

Exclusion compliant: No

Function details: This is a replacement for MadmanBot 13.

For inactive admins that will be eligible for desysoping on the first of the next month:

• First run of the month:
  • Report inactive admins in new Month YYYY section at Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/YYYY
  • Notify inactive admins of pending suspension via talk page and email (if enabled)
• Daily:
  • Remove active admins from Month YYYY section at Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/YYYY
• -7 days:
  • Notify inactive admins of imminent suspension via talk page and email (if enabled)

Configuration: User:JJMC89 bot/config/InactiveAdmins

The task is not exclusion compliant since only one project page is edited and notices are mandatory.

@Madman: for commentary. Your prior bot task has been unreliably operating lately. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:17, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Emailed Madman as well. — xaosflux ^Talk 11:22, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JJMC89: can you run this on a shadow page first for comparison? (e.g. Wikipedia:Inactive administrators/2017/test) ? — xaosflux ^Talk 11:19, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Xaosflux: I output the inactive list on testwiki without notifications. This is what would be reported for August 2017. (Note: no templates there.) The only difference that I note is the last log dates. MadmanBot appears to be excluding some log types, while I am not currently excluding any. — JJMC89 (T·C) 16:01, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I actually expected another entry on there - are you running a whitelist? — xaosflux ^Talk 17:55, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the config currently has Useight excluded. — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly should exclude "automatic patrol" log entries - these would be redundant with edits anyway. — xaosflux ^Talk 17:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I can code log exclusions tonight (UTC-7). — JJMC89 (T·C) 18:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This task is  on hold pending possible repair of MadmanBot. — JJMC89 (T·C) 20:09, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{Bot withdrawn}} MadmanBot is back in action. Should the task need replacing in the future, let me know. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:24, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

---

{{BAG assistance needed}} Reopened. Autopatrol logs now excluded. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:29, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (60 days). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. @JJMC89: - please coordinate with Madman to prevent double emails later this month. — xaosflux ^Talk 23:47, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JJMC89: this seems to have been going fine and I'm OK to review it unless there is anything else you want to monitor first? — xaosflux ^Talk 03:01, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. @Xaosflux: Everything is good on my end; review away. — JJMC89 (T·C) 04:36, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Approved. task approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:16, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.