Category:Culture by genre
[edit]
Category:Olaf II of Norway
[edit]
Category:Transport in Port Elizabeth
[edit]
Category:Metropolitan routes in Port Elizabeth
[edit]
Category:Comics characters by series
[edit]
Category:1st century BC in Judea
[edit]
- Nominator's rationale: delete, isolated category with one subcategory only. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:06, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 17:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to 1st century BC in the Herodian kingdom, per Herodian kingdom, and comparable to the existing Category:1st century BC in the Hasmonean Kingdom. Per the article, Judea isn't a country, it's a region or province (depending on the era). Though I'll agree, putting "kingdoms" which are pretty much client states, under "country", is still a bit questionable. See also: Client kingdoms in ancient Rome. - jc37 00:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Jc37: the Herodian kingdom is entirely within the 1st century BC so there wouldn't be any distinction between Category:Herodian kingdom and 1st century BC in the Herodian kingdom. Besides the article Siege of Jerusalem (63 BC) is not about the Herodian kingdom. Marcocapelle (talk) 05:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the main problem is more stemming from trying to put these in the "by country" tree. I'm looking at Category:Centuries by empire, and thinking that maybe these should instead be more part of that tree in some way. Maybe have a subcat of Category:1st century BC in the Roman Empire called: Category:1st century BC in provinces of the Roman Empire, to hold these cats? Then using "Judea" might work. I'm also wondering if there are more cats out there similarly mis-categorized as "countries". - jc37 15:49, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - May not have been "a country as such" but was still a recognized geographical area. Has been populated, is now valid. - The Bushranger One ping only 06:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Split to Category:1st century BC in the Hasmonean Kingdom, Category:1st-century BC establishments in the Hasmonean Kingdom, Category:Herodian kingdom and Category:Establishments in the Herodian kingdom. I have no objection to a broad use of "countries" to include client states, but these C1 BC Judea categories are an unnecessary layer. There is a Category:Judea (Roman province) which is roughly speaking a succeeding category, but this and the nominated cats were not linked until now and do not seem to be part of a "Judea" chronology series. Ancient history centuries in Israel were merged long ago, e.g. Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_22#Category:10th-century_BC_establishments_in_Israel. There exist Category:Jews and Judaism in the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire within Category:Ancient Jewish history, and Category:Israel in the Roman era within Category:History of Israel by period, which are not currently integrated/interlinked, so there is scope for further rationalisation already, and we do not need this isolated structure. – Fayenatic London 22:43, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- (as nominator) I am supporting this split alternative, as it fits much better with the existing category structure. Marcocapelle (talk) 23:38, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:The Bigs video games
[edit]
Category:Burton family
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename to Category:Burton family (motorsport). – Fayenatic London 12:19, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Ambiguously named category. This was intended for four related people involved in the sport of auto racing (two father-son pairs where the fathers are brothers), but within the past couple of days somebody tried to file several politicians named Burton (who were obviously related to each other, but not verifiably to the racers at all) in here, before noticing the problem and then replacing it with a non-existent redlinked Category:Burton family of California.
There may be a case that this should just be deleted as WP:OCASSOC -- OCAT doesn't completely ban "family relation" categories outright, but it does suggest that the bar for when one is warranted is considerably higher than just "a handful of family members have articles", and requires some evidence that the family routinely get discussed and covered collectively as a family in the sources -- but I wasn't prepared to formulate a deletion argument since I don't know enough about them to know whether that bar is passable here or not (though obviously I won't stand in the way if consensus does lean more in that direction). But at the very least, if it is kept it does need to be named more clearly and unambiguously due to the existence of other unrelated Burton families. Bearcat (talk) 18:41, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or rename?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 14:01, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Marcocapelle. --woodensuperman 14:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, but add a WP:CAT#category description, clarifying intended membership. Per WP:CAAP, I think an article could be written about this family, so even though such article does not exist (yet), this seems to be a "keep". And we don't need to disambiguate, unless/until there are other cats to disambiguate with. - jc37 00:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- If kept we should definitely disambiguate, there are plenty of different Burtons. Marcocapelle (talk) 19:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. My comments were intended to suggest that we should disambiguate (if necessary), but apparently, they were less-than clear on that. My apologies. Thanks again for the clarification. - jc37 23:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Usage notes on categories don't tend to work all that well at keeping them clean of wrong entries — people routinely just add whatever categories they think applicable and walk away without actually reading the usage notes to see if they're doing it wrong, so even categories with usage notes still routinely have to be monitored and cleaned up for wrong usage. So if we want to keep the category, then it does need to be at a clear and unequivocal name, because a simple usage note won't accomplish jack spit. Bearcat (talk) 22:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps not for the more "enthusiastic" editors, but I think adding cat descriptions still is effective for many if not most editors, and - more importantly - for our readers. - jc37 23:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Rename to
Category:Burton family (auto racing)Category:Burton family (motorsport). Four articles is enough for a family cat, and as Bearcat points out, this does need dabbing. - The Bushranger One ping only 22:37, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- If we're going to disambiguate, we should probably use what's on other articles and categories (e.g. Category:Drifting (motorsport), Endurance racing (motorsport)). It looks like it's (motorsport). - jc37 23:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Good catch, updated, thnanks. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:08, 21 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Ice exoplanets
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Purely speculative category with no clear inclusion criteria. None of these planets is known to have a solid icy surface. Some of them could have rocky surfaces, liquid water oceans at the surface, or be mini-Neptunes with no surface. SevenSpheres (talk) 18:52, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:58, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. G4 The Bushranger One ping only 01:41, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: WP:PERFCAT --woodensuperman 11:50, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Marcocapelle (talk) 15:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this one, and its parent Category:Eurovision Song Contest people, and the rest of the parent's subcats, per WP:PERFCAT, as the nom noted. - jc37 00:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm with you on the conductors, but would the "people" category not be valid if it only includes the executives/organisers? And would it not be defining for the contestants? --woodensuperman 08:50, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough on the businesspeople. But the commentators cat seem to fall under WP:OC#Performers by production or performance venue to me. If a Master of ceremonies or a Sports commentator, is a performer, surely these are. As for the contestants cat, I look at Contestant, and see "participant in a contest". Well, if the "contest" in question is a form of entertainment, then all participants being viewed for entertainment purposes are "performers". - jc37 16:03, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I think that participating in a contest is slightly different from appearing on a television show about the contest. I mean, by all means nominate the contestants categories, but wouldn't want to lump them together with this nomination as the criteria would be different. --woodensuperman 16:36, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You're probably right that "contestants" could use a separate nom. - jc37 16:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. I've just noticed this discussion: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 October 8#Category:Eurovision Song Contest presenters. Is this not essentially the same thing? Can it be speedied in this case? --woodensuperman 16:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per WP:G4, recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion. - RevelationDirect (talk) 01:01, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:WikiProject Lanka Premier League participants
[edit]
Relisted, see Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 December 27#Category:WikiProject Lanka Premier League participants
Windmills 1400-1800
[edit]
- Nominator's rationale: merge, up to 1800 these are mostly one-article categories, unhelpful for navigation. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:50, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-
- Merge - Although my gut feeling was to keep, having so many categories with only one or two articles in seems overkill. In most cases, I don't see there being much impact from merging these categories as proposed. Gazamp (talk) 14:21, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Female murder–suicides
[edit]
- Nominator's rationale: I'm usually of the opinion that in criminology, gender does tend to be a fairly discussed intersection, but this makes no sense. The murder-suicide categories are not strictly for the perpetrators of the events. Is a "female murder-suicide" supposed to be female perpetrators of murder suicides, or victims? By who is tagged here, this is clearly trying to be the perpetrators, but that's too ambiguous, and doesn't match up with the way any of the other murder-suicide categories are used. This is also a very specific intersection and one I am not sure is defining, unlike murderers generally. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:35, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep / oppose deletion. This is very clearly supposed to be about women who commit murder-suicide. I'm not sure what your confusion is about? If Category:Female murderers and Category:Female suicides are defining on the basis of gender and cause of death, then why not when they happen simultaneously? Especially considering how rare it is for women to commit a murder-suicide, news of such events are notable enough to get articles, and thus a category to contain them. Especially for the subcategory Category:Female suicide bombers. AHI-3000 (talk) 09:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It is not very clear, the title is ambiguous. A female murder-suicide could just as easily be one where a woman is a victim. The murder-suicides category is applicable to articles on victims and event based articles as well.
- It is not defining, there is no category tree for "murder-suicide perpetrators" which is what this is trying to be. The subcategory is fine because we already have the suicide bombers category tree. PARAKANYAA (talk) 09:59, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dimadick, what do you think about this? AHI-3000 (talk) 23:18, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It seems to cover only women who commit murder-suicide. No confusion there. Dimadick (talk) 01:09, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dimadick In contradiction to every other category in this tree - every other one is for both perpetrators, events and victims. Why would the victims be excluded from the scope of this category, when it is not obvious by the name, and all other similarly named categories have a different scope? Why are we only tagging people and not events? We have no tree for murder-suicide perpetrators. When I read this, I thought it was for femicides. PARAKANYAA (talk) 03:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- You thought it was a duplicate category? Femicides are covered in Category:Femicide. Dimadick (talk) 11:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @Dimadick A femicide is not always a murder suicide. I thought this was about femicide murder-suicides, which are discussed in literature. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- It's not my fault you're confused about the scope of this, it's been made clear that this category is for individuals who committed both murder and suicide. AHI-3000 (talk) 17:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @AHI-3000 Then the category should be renamed to reflect its scope, as “Female perpetrators of murder–suicides”, instead of masquerading as an event-based category when it’s really trying to be a person category. I still don’t think this is defining but it’s at least clear. PARAKANYAA (talk) 20:51, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @PARAKANYAA: I'm fine with a renaming if that's what you really wanted in the first place. AHI-3000 (talk) 20:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @PARAKANYAA: Though "Female murder–suicide perpetrators" would be better and shorter than what you suggested. AHI-3000 (talk) 21:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @AHI-3000 Yeah that’s better. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @PARAKANYAA: Do you prefer to have this category deleted or renamed? AHI-3000 (talk) 21:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @AHI-3000 My issues with this category are twofold:
- Misleading, in that its actual scope is not clearly indicated by its title. This would be solved with a renaming.
- How defining is "Murder–suicide perpetrators" vs murderers? I feel that this existing as a "female" subcategory of...a category we do not have, is odd. Is "Murder–suicide perpetrators" itself a defining category? Or murder-suicide victims? If this is changed to that, I feel those categories would follow. It's not obviously trivial, but I am not sure how others would feel about it. The way we handle the murder-suicide categories is very odd in that we have victims, perpetrators and events all lumped together, but since it's such a broad category I have never known how to deal with it.
- So a rename would be a major improvement over it being kept as is but the implications of this category concern me. PARAKANYAA (talk) 01:54, 19 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- @PARAKANYAA: Instead of just deletion, could you modify the proposal for the optional possibility of renaming it too? AHI-3000 (talk) 18:49, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Category:Hispanic empresses and queens
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete (non-admin closure). ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:32, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: I think referring to them as "Hispanic" is likely to get confused/misunderstood as being someone who is Latino/Hispanic as an ethnicity rather than the leader of Hispania. SMasonGarrison 04:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:People from Rájec-Jestřebí
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Category with just one entry. Lost in Quebec (talk) 02:39, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Head-to-head arcade video games
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: per WP:NONDEF I looked through the articles to see that almost none of them use this rare term "Head-to-head". There is no page titled Head-to-head arcade game at the moment either and in turn this category is essentially just for any multiplayer arcade game; more specifically arcade-only games? Anyway, not defining. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 02:12, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I fail to see the point of such a category. Is a game defined by having a multiplayer mode? Dimadick (talk) 01:13, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- A merge into both the multiplayer and arcade video games categories would be more helpful though, just not those exact categories, must be a subcategory of either one if already in the parent
- QuantumFoam66 (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Swedish politicians of Assyrian/Syriac descent
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: WP:Consistency across category names, similar to Swedish people of Assyrian descent Surayeproject3 (talk) 02:02, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Swedish people of Assyrian or Syriac descent
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:57, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: WP:Consistency across category names Surayeproject3 (talk) 02:02, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Martyrs of the Chinese Revolution
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: delete. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Category name is not even close to NPOV. Amigao (talk) 01:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This seems to be a more formalized term within Chinese-language writing. Wikipedia permits "martyr" as a categorization so long as it's recognized in reliable sources (eg Category:Christian martyrs, Category:Muslim martyrs) ~ Pbritti (talk) 04:07, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Another problem is that the category fails WP:PRECISION. Which revolution are we talking about? For example, the Chinese Communist Revolution or the 1911 Revolution? - Amigao (talk) 05:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Relatedly, parent category Category:Martyrs is itself a subcategory of Category:Victims of religious intolerance, which really doesn't apply here. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Of note, a somewhat similar discussion in the past for an "Iranian martyrs" category resulted in deletion. There is also a fair amount of WP:OVERLAPCAT with a category such as Category:Communists executed by the Republic of China. Amigao (talk) 05:51, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Striking my keep based on that precedent and redundancy with a more neutral existing alternative. Thanks for responding with such great evidence. ~ Pbritti (talk) 13:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Religious martyrs are one thing. Political martyrs are much less clearly NPOV-definable. - The Bushranger One ping only 05:47, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per The Bushranger. Marcocapelle (talk) 07:42, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Sailing clubs of the United States
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: rename. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:56, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Following on from this discussion regarding parent Category:Yacht clubs in the United States that resulted in that being kept. "Yacht club" is the WP:COMMONNAME for this sort of organization, and as demonstrated it is overwhelmingly the preference for the naming of these categories' contents. (The one exception, Maryland, has one that is questionable with regard to being in category scope, and the other's article begins "is a yacht club".) Accordingly these should be renamed to (a) reflect common useage and their contents and (b) maintain consistency with their parent category. (Note that categories for California, Washington (state), and Puerto Rico are already at "Yacht club" and do not need renaming.) - The Bushranger One ping only 01:46, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Category:Video games about Cossacks
[edit]
Category:Chaldean Americans
[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The result of the discussion was: merge. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 05:54, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nominator's rationale: Category fits better within the scope of American people of Assyrian descent, noting that Chaldean Catholics are ethnically Assyrian and category includes those from the United States Surayeproject3 (talk) 01:33, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.