Looks good to me, I made some minor formatting changes. 
Phoenix2 4th of July! 20:51 (UTC)
- Nominate and support.
Phoenix2 4th of July! 20:51 (UTC) - Nice, but some references will be required, and the images need fixing for classic skin users (I presume they are meant to be stacked vertically?). -- ALoan (Talk) 5 July 2005 17:34 (UTC)
- Yes, the images are meant to be stacked. Maybe I should switch to the classic skin to see what the lists look like there. ---Phoenix2 5 July 2005 19:27 (UTC)
- Support -- Ian ≡ talk 09:42, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
- Support Dsmdgold 04:38, July 14, 2005 (UTC)
- Note: This nomination has exceeded the normal 10 day process, but currently has only 3, rather than the minimum 4, supports. There is one reference now. The Classic Skin issue seems to be okay to me now, so to my mind ALoan's comments are dealt with (though if he disagrees he should say so). I think it should remain on this list for another four days to see whether it can gain the required support, jguk 07:23, 16 July 2005 (UTC)
- Reluctantly oppose - the skin issue is resolved, but the single reference to the main NASA home page is too thin for me. -- ALoan (Talk) 19:35, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Given that only NASA have a space shuttle (and so only NASA have space shuttle missions), and that their own list is likely to be complete, what further reference do you think it should have? jguk 19:46, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- Once again, I only reformatted the list. if you think that the NASA page is too thin of a reference, any ideas as to what could be a better one? Phoenix2 23:15, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
- Reluctantly oppose - the skin issue is resolved, but the single reference to the main NASA home page is too thin for me. -- ALoan (Talk) 19:35, 17 July 2005 (UTC)
- I went onto the NASA homepage and did a bit of searching, and found online versions of the mission summaries. I referenced the two main sites providing links to all of the missions. Also, I found the future launch schedule (though it doesn't completely match up with this list after SRS-121) and got a link from our Buran article to reference that mission. I hope this is acceptable for ALoan and I now support. --Spangineer (háblame) 19:10, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Also, that table of statistics at the top of the article was copied directly from Space Shuttle program, and after looking through the external links to that article, I can't find a reference for that information. --Spangineer (háblame) 19:44, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, but wouldn't it be good introductory information for the subsequent table? Phoenix2 21:58, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Sorry, I meant the table of statistics at the top of the list. Yeah, I agree, it's nice to have it there, but I'd like to know if it's accurate or not. I'm still supporting, hoping that we'll be able to find some reference to verify it. --Spangineer (háblame) 14:16, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- Yes, but wouldn't it be good introductory information for the subsequent table? Phoenix2 21:58, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Also, that table of statistics at the top of the article was copied directly from Space Shuttle program, and after looking through the external links to that article, I can't find a reference for that information. --Spangineer (háblame) 19:44, July 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Support great work --Sophitus 15:50, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- I too Support =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:03, July 19, 2005 (UTC)