View text source at Wikipedia
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are over 100 non-free images on Mexican peso - 98 tagged as non-free and several on Commons that are about to be deleted as copyright violations.
Having every front and back of every edition of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from every non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from each series, one image per series can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:12, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:00, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are over 100 non-free images on Mexican peso - 98 tagged as non-free and several on Commons that are about to be deleted as copyright violations.
Having every front and back of every edition of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from every non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from each series, one image per series can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:36, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are over 100 non-free images on Mexican peso - 98 tagged as non-free and several on Commons that are about to be deleted as copyright violations.
Having every front and back of every edition of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from every non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from each series, one image per series can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:04, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are over 100 non-free images on Mexican peso - 98 tagged as non-free and several on Commons that are about to be deleted as copyright violations.
Having every front and back of every edition of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from every non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from each series, one image per series can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:19, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are over 100 non-free images on Mexican peso - 98 tagged as non-free and several on Commons that are about to be deleted as copyright violations.
Having every front and back of every edition of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from every non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from each series, one image per series can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:25, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:01, 14 May 2020 (UTC)
Fails WP:NFCC 3a and 8 - there are over 100 non-free images on Mexican peso - 98 tagged as non-free and several on Commons that are about to be deleted as copyright violations.
Having every front and back of every edition of every bill is vastly too much for the non-free content criteria. I am nominating for deletion every bill from every non-current series. However, if the writers of the article want to keep a representative image from each series, one image per series can probably be justified, though it should probably be pulled out of the table and described with cited prose. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 07:31, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 8 May 2020 (UTC)
Not sure that this file can't be replaced with a free image. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 02:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)
I saw this picture on the site I mentioned, I was looking for better quality and I found it on one Chinese site... But it is here too http://paroxysm.canalblog.com/archives/2014/12/19/31170544.html I don't know for sure which flyer or magazine this photo was taken from... In fact, this is the only image that is shown everywhere, there are still videos from this exhibit on YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5UWcUoKZxw.--IRONKAGE (talk) 12:02, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
It is not integral to the subject article nor is it sufficiently different from the original artwork so does not pass WP:NFCC → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 11:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
It is not integral to the subject article nor was it actually usesd for the song's release so does not pass WP:NFCC. → Lil-℧niquԐ1 - (Talk) - 11:43, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Image(s) fail per WP:NFCC#3a and #8. Main image used in article convey significant enough information to the reader (#3a), and its omission from the article would not be detrimental to the article's understanding (#8). livelikemusic talk! 21:10, 7 May 2020 (UTC)