View text source at Wikipedia


Wikipedia:Peer review/Croatia national football team/archive2

Previous peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because of multiple suggestions at WP:FAC. Currently a Good Article, this article has failed FAC 4 times now because of new issues every time. I managed to fix up most of them, but the most vital of such is the prose. I admit myself there are many problems with some of the prose wording, solely because the other editors and myself are second-speakers of English. Additionally, there may be some other minor visible issues which may prevent this from being a Featured Article. I'm mainly looking for prose problems, but if you can find anything else then please don't hesitate to arouse your critical comments.

Thanks, Domiy (talk) 22:52, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Comments by Ink Runner (talk · contribs)

(Newest comments on the bottom)

Well, not 100% specifically but it is mainly cited in the source: "Three players were brave enough to test him early in his reign when they broke a training camp curfew to visit a nightclub: Bilic booted them all out of his squad and fined them GBP17,000 each."
Oh, I must have missed that. I guess Evelyn Wood's methods don't really work after all. XD
I replaced the reference with a more detailed one found here. I have gone ahead and put in the same warning the article itself put in, distressing images follow as you can see. Domiy (talk) 23:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A 'cap' is an appearance for a national team in an international fixture. Uncapped is also another football term to imply the players have not yet appeared for the national team. I have gone ahead and just worded that more simply and understandably. Domiy (talk) 23:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thanks for clearing that up.
Ah yes, good suggestion. I always found trouble with these last few sentences about the game against Turkey. It is really difficult to explain it from an encyclopedic point of view. Turkey had scored after the final whistle should have gone, which made the game controversial. However, as I have mentioned in a separate footnote on not that sentence - "Under the rules of Association football and the official European Championship tournament regulations, a loss inflicted via a penalty shootout does not count as a defeat, but rather a tie which needed a final proccess to determine the team which advances." Domiy (talk) 04:42, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Technically, yes. However, if Croatia hosted the event then this largely effects the team itself and has a predominant correlation with the team. For a first, the organization of such a bid comes solely from the domestic governing bodies of football (in this case, it was the Croatian Football Federation). Likewise, it would mean that the Croatian team would not have to go through qualifications for the tournament as the hosts automatically qualify. So, it does have quite a large correlation. Domiy (talk) 08:38, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. Like I said, I don't know much about soccer, so if I make errors about terms or anything in my comments, don't hesitate to correct me.
Did you forget a suggestion here?
No, I'm just putting the newest suggestions in a new section so they're not too hard to find.
Yes, fair enough. I have removed the entire paragraph.

Question - when exactly should digits be used? Can they be used at all to express numerals or should such be written out in words every time? I remember slightly one time somebody suggesting that any number above 9 (nine) should be expressed in digits. Not sure what the actual style is on this, if one even exists. Domiy (talk) 23:13, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, numbers larger than nine can be written out or as numerals; the MoS has a complete list of rules here.
Yes, as mentioned in the next sentence, it was a significant role while the country was attempting to be considered seperate from Yugoslavia, both officially and unofficially.Domiy (talk) 08:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think both our opinions are equal on this since it doesnt have much to do with soccer terminology etc. The source clearly mentions the same thing about the economy and Catholic church and how the national team outdone them in terms of acheieving unity among people. I actually thought it had a good role in this article and section as the economy and especially the Cathlolic church are very predominant characteristics and powers in Croatia, and football beat them both.Domiy (talk) 08:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The book source sure does make it seem that way, and it actually does say "on the other hand..." which goes on to state the negative impacts of the political connection. I think this assumption can easily be made as there seems to be no other possible reason as to why the English tabloids would publish such bashing on the nation and the team itself. The fact that they were involved in the former presidents mission of acheiving a partiotic and united Croatian state didm't really go well in other countries. I know its completely irrelevant at this time and place, but it is very possible that this political correlation continues to effect the team; they have been unfairly treated and mysterously had things made more difficult for them in recent years. Domiy (talk) 08:28, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, I won't be here on Sunday, so please excuse me if I cannot reply to your comments right away.

Thanks again for your efforts. I hope its not too much trouble, but I recently added a new section of info and compiled another bit of content which I plan to include into the article. If you have time, please review the "Nicknames and Pronunciation" section and also, the following content:

The Croatian team is a fully licensed member of both FIFA and UEFA; these two governing confederations hold control over their associated teams in matters of discipline and scrutiny. FIFA hold jurisdiction over the global football played by Croatia, which is mainly their participation in the traditional FIFA World Cup. UEFA is responsible for governance of Croatia in European competitions, such as the European Championships. These two confederations therefore hold the most power over the national team, a role which has been recently practiced to full extent after UEFA threatened Croatia with expulsion and FIFA fined Croatia over crowd troubles.

Well, I couldn't find this paragraph on the page anywhere, but I'll still review it just in case.
"The Croatian team is a fully licensed member of both FIFA and UEFA; these two governing confederations hold control over their associated teams in matters of discipline and scrutiny. FIFA hold jurisdiction over the global football played by Croatia, which is mainly their participation in the traditional FIFA World Cup. UEFA is responsible for governance of Croatia in European competitions, such as the European Championships." -> "The Croataian team is a fully licensed member of FIFA and UEFA; these two confederations govern their associated teams in discipline and scrutiny. FIFA governs Croatia's international games, mainly in the World Cup. UEFA governs Croatia in European competitions like the European Championships."
" These two confederations therefore hold the most power over the national team, a role which has been recently practiced to full extent after UEFA threatened Croatia with expulsion and FIFA fined Croatia over crowd troubles." -> This sentence isn't really necessary, since from the previous sentences, the reader can already figure out that UEFA and FIFA hold the most power over the national team.

The subsequent role of authority belongs to the Croatian football federation, which abidingly organises the team’s participation in major competitions and scheduled matches. The federation is currently led by Vlatko Markovic, who remains in charge of representing the national team in formal matters of appeal and other conference events. The Croatian football federation, abbreviated as HNS, has the greatest domestic influence over the team; they maintain the role of player registration and the selection of a succeeding team coach and associated staff. In addition, the HNS becomes one of the primary sources of salary funds for the players.

"The subsequent role of authority belongs to the Croatian football federation, which abidingly organises the team’s participation in major competitions and scheduled matches." -> "The team is also under the authority of the Croatian football federation, which itself abides by the rules of the FIFA and UEFA."
"The federation is currently led by Vlatko Markovic, who remains in charge of representing the national team in formal matters of appeal and other conference events." -> "The federation is led by Vlatko Markovic, who represents the team in formal appeals and conferences."
"The Croatian football federation, abbreviated as HNS, has the greatest domestic influence over the team; they maintain the role of player registration and the selection of a succeeding team coach and associated staff. In addition, the HNS becomes one of the primary sources of salary funds for the players." -> "The federation (abbreviated HNS) has the greatest immediate influence on the team; it governs player registration and selects the team coaching staff. In addition, the HNS is the primary source of the players' salaries."

Currently assigned head coach Slaven Bilic holds the next-highest authority over the team His role is to select, organise and stipulate the participating players, as well as enforcing team policies. The head coach must also choose a team captain; by general processes, this role holds slightly more power than the ordinary players as the captain must organise the team while on the playing field.

"Currently assigned head coach Slaven Bilic holds the next-highest authority over the team His role is to select, organise and stipulate the participating players, as well as enforcing team policies." -> "Head coach Slaven Bilic holds the next-highest authority over the team; he selects and organises the players and determines the terms of their contracts as well as enforcing team policies."
"The head coach must also choose a team captain; by general processes, this role holds slightly more power than the ordinary players as the captain must organise the team while on the playing field." -> "Finally, the head coach also chooses the team captain, who organises the team during games."

Domiy (talk) 11:09, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

THANK YOU VERY MUCH - this is more than I expected, and I am really grateful for your efforts here. Your prose suggestions are much better, and I have gone in fixed them up into the article. Any more suggestions are appreciated as I too am stuck on improvements, as I said before, English is my second language. Domiy (talk) 03:06, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]