Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 25

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on January 25, 2025.

• Inter-presidency of Donald Trump → Donald Trump#Inter-presidency#(2021–present)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Too many levels of "huh?" going on here to know what is going on, including the double section redirect target and the lack of this term being in the target article. Steel1943 (talk) 22:12, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• It's a simple typo of the section #Inter-presidency (2021–present) that existed at time of redirect creation. The section is renamed #First post-presidency (2021–2025) so update/retarget that. Hyphenation Expert (talk) 00:02, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Not anymore, the "Too many levels of huh?" was part of an edit war that was just solved and has been concluded with an edit request to change the title. Since you two already do not know what I'm talking about, I will explain.

  This is my explanation. 2601:483:400:1CD0:A1A4:FD62:9508:F4EB (talk) 02:23, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I reverted this edit by Lazesusdasiru to retarget the redirect to Donald Trump#Inter-presidency (2021–2025). (My revert was solely to enforce not changing the target during an ongoing RfD and does not reflect whether or not I support or oppose the edit.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:05, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Individual 1 → Donald Trump#Special counsel investigation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Individual-1 → Donald Trump#Special counsel investigation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Individual One → Donald Trump#Special counsel investigation  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in the target article, and the target section does not exist (anymore). My first consideration was to "refine" to Donald Trump#Mueller investigation since they seems to be what the current target is meant to refer, but the issue of the redirects not being mentioned in the target article still exists. Other options I found were the articles Mueller special counsel investigation and Mueller report, but the redirects do not seem to be mentioned there either. However, this is an alternative name that has several sources ... not sure what the best path is here, but my thoughts are, in order of preference, delete (due to lack of mention), retarget to Donald Trump (remove the section redirect), retarget to Donald Trump#Muller investigation (but it's not mentioned there), or retarget to Mueller special counsel investigation and Mueller report (no mention at either one, my stance is equal on both). Steel1943 (talk) 23:55, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete because it is a common way to identify people generically -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 03:17, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 19:46, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, it's a commonly-used identifier, and this redirect is only for a single slightly notable use of it. FunIsOptional (talk) (use ping please) 13:23, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Timeline of investigations into Donald Trump and Russia (July–December 2018) § December (or a more precise anchor therein), where it is mentioned, without prejudice against retargeting to Trump, the investigation, or the report in the future if the term is reïntroduced on any of those articles. This is a well-known bit of political jargon, and while it could be ambiguous, that's not a good reason to delete unless it is ambiguous. (Cf. Jane Roe, a common litigant pseudonym and yet one with a PTOPIC.) -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|🤷) 17:25, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Pakistani kalashnikov → Khyber Pass copy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Pakistani kalashnikov gun → Khyber Pass copy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

No evidence this is used as an alternative name. Cremastra (u — c) 16:12, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Perhaps retarget to Gun law in Pakistan which is the target of Kalashnikov culture. Jay 💬 18:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, charlotte ^👸♥ 20:34, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Ready-mixed → Concrete  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ready mixed → Concrete  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Ready mix → Ready-mix concrete  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

was about to retarget the "mixed" redirects to heavy mix concrete, but results, at least on my end, were a little torn between concrete and mortar. admittedly on the extremely weak end of noms since concrete was still a primary enough topic and the article on mortar doesn't mention its ready mix flavor, but i'm pretty sure i'm missing something consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 20:28, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Well, I stand by my edit from 13 years ago for the last one, lol. I think they should all redirect to Ready-mix concrete if they all refer to concrete. I have never heard anyone say "Ready-mixed concrete," but if I did, I would immediately assume they meant Ready-mix concrete. I like to saw logs! (talk) 09:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: When I hear "ready mix" I think ready mix food or instant food powders. Remove "concrete" from your search, and all the food results you get was my idea of the primary topic. Anyway we don't have an article on ready mix powdered foods, and concrete seems to be the primary topic. No comment on the nomination. Jay 💬 12:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 22:40, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete could just as easily refer to food [1][2][3], or other stuff that should be mixed before use -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 08:12, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Soyjak.party → Imageboard#Soyjak.party  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Wojak#Soyjak or Delete. Been looking into this thing, it's mentioned on my proposed target, and seems more relevant there than here. It's talked about on Twitter and 4chan to some degree from my research, so people might search it here. Possible deletion as the topic appears to be connected to some disruptive editing, the creator of this very redirect, for example. Maybe having nothing (similar to our policy regarding a certain webcomic artist) would be better. Either way I doubt the status quo of this redirect is the best way to go about things. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:39, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Five-gallon bucket → Bucket  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]
• Five gallon bucket → Bucket  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ]

only mentioned in the name of one external link, which i'm honestly not entirely sure isn't spam. five-gallon bucket was an article until 2011, and it surprisingly had some sources, but i think those should be stashed somewhere for later use and the title returned to red as malformed and burgerland-centric, assuming the sources are usable in the first place consarn _{(speak evil) (see evil)} 16:59, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I removed the whole EL section anyway, since it was awful. There's nothing special about this particular size, and these are no more useful search terms than n-gallon, m-liter, etc. buckets. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:42, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Ehh, I just noticed that the first one has some history...it claims that a merge happened, but I don't see anything that actually exists at the target. Maybe it did and got removed eventually, but it's long gone if so. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 17:44, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Yes, it was merged. I have tagged the redirect with {{R from merge}}. Jay 💬 14:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore and take to AfD (optional) or keep as an R from merge. 5-gallon buckets are likely to be the most common size for buckets, to the point where they might just have icon status. Probs a likely search term too (but it's true that there isn't much there for readers who search it at this time). Had notability enough to exist as an article for 4 years with some references which, even if shoddy, still existed. These are the types of buckets you see at all hardware stores, highly used in street performance and are overall pretty symbolic of many aspects of culture. There was a good chunk at this title prior, and RfD is not the spot to settle the case for inclusion on WP, imo. I think it could stand on its own with some improvement, and/or exist as a section somewhere at the very least with the references.Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:49, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Does anyone search for this bucket size specifically? Darkfrog24 (talk) 00:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I might tbh, it's a pretty important cultural symbol potentially. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:43, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't expecting to be convinced by this argument, but having googled various bucket sizes (forgive me, I have no earthly idea how big a gallon is), I agree that this is The One True Bucket. They even sell them in Canada, a country that is ostensibly on the metric system, as "5-Gal/19-L" buckets. -- asilvering (talk) 03:02, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore per Utopes. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:20, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Delete or restore?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• P: → Wikipedia:Contents/Portals  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Probably not useful as an open-ended redirect when no article title is given for it. There are mainspace articles such as P:Machinery and P:ano that could have very well been sought, but instead these two characters (which would otherwise indicate portalspace if a portal's name was given to them), take readers to a portal of its own choosing. People looking for portals using the P: pseudo-namespace, can do so by typing in "P:", followed by the name of the portal they were after. I'm not convinced an "empty"-titled redirect is going to be of much use here. Targeting P seems more useful, if it targets anything. This one doesn't even point to portal space. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 14:25, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – I don't follow your reasoning. It's not for users looking for a specific portal, and it doesn't take users to a portal of its own choosing. It's a shortcut to portal space, and while it doesn't technically go to a portal space page, it goes to the contents for portal pages. Whether that's the best use for P: (as opposed to going to P (disambiguation)), I don't know, but it does make sense as a shortcut. Mclay1 (talk) 01:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A shortcut to portalspace is good. I'm just not convinced that people who type in one singular alphabet character and a punctuation is looking for information on portals. Because all articles have a title, there is nothing specified after the "P:" so there is never any assurance that a portal is being sought after. And PNRs are not widely known about to our general reader-base, and especially so as this PNR is just the letter "P", so I don't think there's an automatic assumption here that adding a punctuation to this letter "P" would take someone to Wikipedia:Contents/Portals. We try to keep a barrier up to prevent readers from falling into the backrooms while navigating the encyclopedia. Wikipedia:Contents/Portals already has P:CP and P:PORT. P:P doesn't exist but perhaps it should in place of this titleless pseudo-namespace redirect for the simplest trapdoor people can fall into without catching innocent reading passerbys who were on their way to the P:ano content article but hit enter too early after the colon. Very plausible to type this in while looking for a mainspace title, which means that the search result should stay in mainspace and these two characters as a XNR is impeding that, imo. I'd suggest targeting P (disambiguation) where the portal page can very well be hatnoted. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 13:58, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, makes sense as master shortcut for portals. —Kusma (talk) 22:05, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Other similar RfDs have ended in deletion. If this is going to be a keep contra all those, I'd like to see some more participation.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, asilvering (talk) 22:24, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Texvc → MediaWiki#Rich content  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I removed the mention from the target in Special:Diff/1267682290. The name of the parser that an optional Math extension to the MediaWiki software used six years ago is undue trivia. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:14, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• You're probably right, if it does belong anywhere it's probably in the history section (like, Math support predates the extension system and texvc has multiple academic publications about it). I don't really think RfD is the correct venue to discuss this though; the talk page would've been better. Legoktm (talk) 04:50, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Notified of this discussion at the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 15:16, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Violent Pornography → Mezmerize  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 in order to be consistent with Violent porn and Violent pornography. -Samoht27 (talk) 21:53, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:SMALLDETAILS and the capitalized title. Frankly, I'm skeptical that the other two should redirect where they redirect either, since the target is about one country's particular law, part of which includes violence in porn, and not about the overarching concept of violence in porn, which would make a lot more sense. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 06:06, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Dog poop → Feces  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I feel that there should be an article specifically about dog poop rather than redirecting to the page feces (that article is about feces in general). There are standalone articles specifically about the feces of a specific animal, including Human feces, Cow dung, and Manure. style="color #964b00 Cyber the tiger🐯 (talk) 21:42, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment, Dog Poo is currently its own redirect, leading to List of South Park characters. If we expand the Dog poop redirect to be a full article, i'd recommending retargeting Dog Poo to the new article. -Samoht27 (talk) 22:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• James logan elementry school → List of schools of the School District of Philadelphia  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Unlikely misspelling with near zero usage[4]. If kept, redirect to James Logan Elementary School instead. मल्ल (talk) 20:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This is just pollution. BD2412 T 20:22, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I doubt this will ever see much use even if retargeted. UndeadAnarchy (talk) 09:04, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Naver Enter → Naver  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target. Google search gives a bunch of headlines like "Company and Naver Enter Agreement..." and also typos for "never enter", so if this is an actual subunit of the company I cannot find any evidence of it. Rusalkii (talk) 19:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is a name of the real website run by Naver. It's a new aggregator. https://m.entertain.naver.com/ Emiya Mulzomdao (talk) 00:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Synthetic music → Synthetic chord  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I don't think this is what most readers would be looking for. 1234qwer1234qwer4 19:00, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Marplan → Research International  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention at target. Isocarboxazid an antidepressant drug currently being sold under the brand name Marplan seems more appropriate. UndeadAnarchy (talk) 13:07, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Revert/retarget per nom. The name can apparently refer to a number of things, including a (former?) subsidiary of Research International, but the antidepressant appears to be the clear primary topic. - Eureka Lott 22:44, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate aside from the current and former targets, there's Marketing Planning Corp (Marplan) subsidiary of McCann (company). There's a UK polling organization called Marplan referred to in several Wikipedia articles (A,B,C,etc) -- which makes 4, 3 of which have single target articles; "Marplan" can be added to Research International with that NYT ref to support its entry. -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 08:21, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• List of Orange Islands Gym Leaders → List of Pokémon characters#Orange Islands Gym Trainers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of Pokemon Orange Island Gym Leaders → List of Pokémon characters#Orange Islands Gym Trainers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• List of Pokemon Orange Islands Gym Leaders → List of Pokémon characters#Orange Islands Gym Trainers  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

There is not a list of Orange Islands Gym Leaders at the target. Furthermore "Orange Islands" is not actually mentioned at the target in any capacity, or at least no longer, nor are any of the (presumably) five gym leaders associated with Orange Islands discussed here either. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:46, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• #1 and #3 have substantive page history and I have tagged them with {{R from merge}}. Jay 💬 10:41, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:53, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page history of both #1 and #3?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 🫃🏻 → Male pregnancy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• 🫃 → Male pregnancy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Retarget to Pregnant man or pregnancy, consistent with 🫄 and 🫄. LIrala (talk) 04:32, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose, the current redirect is fine. Pregnant man is a disambiguation page in which the only page that is applicable regarding the emoji is Male pregnancy. The only other term that could remotely be applicable could be Transgender pregnancy. I still think it should just be left alone. Heart ^(talk) 04:46, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I support a retarget to Transgender pregnancy then. LIrala (talk) 05:58, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The emoji centers around transgender pregnancy, a quick google shows that. LIrala (talk) 05:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  A search shows the "Pregnant man" emoji, which is what a male pregnancy is. I stand by my opposition to retarget. Heart ^(talk) 06:22, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  The article Male pregnancy is mainly about seahorses, while the emoji is of a human man. I think if we end up sticking with the current target, we should at least refine it to the #In humans section of the article. (My first preference is still disambig, per my comment below.) BugGhost 🦗👻 13:45, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to the disambiguation page Pregnant man. I don't see a way to guess whether readers who search for this emoji are looking for Male pregnancy, Transgender pregnancy, or Couvade syndrome, so we should let them decide for themselves. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 05:22, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:31, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to disambig page Pregnant man, per Mx. Granger. I don't think the current target Male pregnancy is a great target as that article is not specific to human males, while the emoji clearly is of a human. The emoji doesn't display any more info to determine a more specific target, so the disambig page Pregnant man is a suitable choice. BugGhost 🦗👻 13:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Rebecca Scofield → 2022 University of Idaho killings  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This should be deleted. Rebecca Scofield was falsely accused of being involved in this crime which is the subject of the article to which it redirects and won a defamation suit over that accusation. She also (appropriately) isn't mentioned (whether by name or otherwise) in the article to which it redirects. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Support - If the false accusation isn't notable enough to be mentioned in the article, there is no point in having a redirect. (However, I do not think mentioning her in the article is entirely out of the question, simply because it was a false accusation; even false accusations can be notable, as in the Dreyfuss affair. I have no opinion about the notability in this particular case.) Nø (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - Scofield is part of the case. --Jax 0677 (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Not mentioned at target, making this a misleading redirect. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:39, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Some1 removed names with summary too much WP:UNDUE weight given to the lawsuit. but kept content about the lawsuit, which was later removed. Note that mention of the tiktoker who accused her, Ashley Guillard was also removed, but continues to be a redirect to the same target. Jay 💬 18:51, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Any further thoughts?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:26, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• RStat → R (programming language)#Commercialized versions of R  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• Rstat → R (programming language)#Commercialized versions of R  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at target. On the other hand, there is Berkeley_r-commands#rstat. 1234qwer1234qwer4 10:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. Not mentioned at all on target. - Dyork (talk) 14:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  My suggestion was to retarget. I have also now realised that RStat exists, where retargeting would not be appropriate, however. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:05, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom. And if RStat is bundled here, delete (only) that. Jay 💬 11:56, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Adding RStat to this nomination since it was mentioned by participants.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Great Dane (artwork) → Great Dane#Great Dane (artwork)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of any artwork in the target page, though there've been a couple of attempts to shoehorn it in. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:03, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment an etching by Sybilla Mittell Weber called "Great Dane" appears in her article -- 65.92.246.77 (talk) 18:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Incorrect. The Art sub-section talks about an artpiece in an exhibition. Jay 💬 15:01, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 14:14, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Sub-section was apparently removed from the target.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:17, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Struck my comment. Did not know that nom removed the Art sub-section as WP:TRIVIA. Retarget to Sybilla Mittell Weber per IP65, tag as {{R to creator}}. Jay 💬 11:03, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Macguide → Apple community  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

• MacGuide → Apple community  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No mention of "Guide" at the target article. Apparently used to be an article about the "MacGuide Magazine" but redirecting a specific magazine name to the general article about the apple community is not going to be helpful for readers who are left without context on why they ended up at the place they did. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Can the pre-BLAR page content be merged to the history of the Macintosh platform? An editor named User:MacGuide did edit the article saying Elan Associates acquired MacGuide. and Elan now publishes MacGuide.... This was in 2007. Jay 💬 07:38, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Also macguide may be bundled here. Jay 💬 07:41, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Bundled together with Macguide as suggested above.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:13, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• 122333221 → Palindromic prime  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

And any similar redirects by the same creator. This is not useful whatsoever—and I'm not sure why User:JonRichfield marked it as reviewed? Remsense ‥ 论 09:19, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand about having marked it as reviewed; I am not aware of having done so. I accidentally created it with an error, then corrected it as a #redirect.

That was all.

As for why I created the redirect at all, I had the choice of giving it an article of its own, or redirecting it to the current target article. Since I can offhand think of nothing else special to say about the number, I did not elect to give it an article of its own. If anyone can think of extra points of interest, it would be easy to change the entry, in which case it would merit the same treatment as any other number of interest, of which there are many articles in WP.

Meanwhile, the cost of retaining it as a redir is trivial, and no one is likely to find himself discomfited by looking it up by accident.

I had considered a similar redir or article for 1223334444555554444333221, which does have the extra point of interest that it is the largest such number, the other two being 11 and 122333221. But I have not decided yet. JonRichfield (talk) 10:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. If there are, in fact, only a handful of palindromic primes then it does make sense to redirect that handful to the article on the topic, and list those of mathematical interest in the article. BD2412 T 20:24, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  But, there are, in fact, not just a handful of them. In fact, there are 401698 of them with 14 digits or less (see the OEIS entry), and it's conjectured (but not proven) that there are infinitely many. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 03:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unremarkable example that just happens to be listed as one example at the target page, and possibly shouldn't even be. No further information about the number is given, and it's not particularly special or would be particularly likely to be searched for. 35.139.154.158 (talk) 03:16, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Varoke → Habbo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Snouthill → Habbo  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, nor any other article. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:32, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 05:11, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• List of aircraft and infantry equipment of the Indian Army → List of infantry equipment of the Indian Army  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The target does not include any aircraft, which are listed at List of active Indian military aircraft. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 04:55, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Classic XY redirect. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 14:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete under WP:G7, per a now-deleted request from the page creator at Talk:List of aircraft and infantry equipment of the Indian Army. - Eureka Lott 17:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment based on page history appears to be a redirect created by a page move. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 01:27, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

After further investigation, I found this talk thread which explains the whole situation. Therefore changing my vote to Speedy delete under WP:G7, since author stated intent to delete page. VolatileAnomaly (talk) 01:38, 26 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:BRRRRRD → Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

At Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 10#WP:BRRRD, the proposal to retarget did not see much discussion. I think it is more funny to retarget to WP:Edit warring. This redirect also has more reverts than WP:BRRRD, which targets EW rather than BRD. HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 01:58, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• I was the closer of the previous RfD, but didn't have an opinion. There was a suggestion at the time to refine to the #Edit warring section if REALLY necessary, and I didn't do that. Don't the letters of the shortcut align (and make sense) better with the current target than with WP:Edit warring? I understand the inconsistency with WP:BRRRD though. Jay 💬 07:33, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to WP:Edit warring per nom, definitely funnier and more accurate. Current target makes it look like 5-reverts is a standard BRD technique, which it's not. BugGhost 🦗👻 13:27, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, 5 reversions are not mentioned at the target, unlikely search term. Alternatively just boldly deal with this redirect for consistency. Likely wouldn't have been reverted, which circumvents the need for a discussion. :} Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 23:40, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Stickerless → Speedcubing#Stickerless  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete: no longer mentioned in target article. -1ctinus📝🗨 00:08, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]