View text source at Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Rush Limbaugh

Rush Limbaugh

[edit]
Resolved:

Inactivity.

This mediation case is closed. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this case page.

view edit delete watch
Filed: 02:32, January 28 2007 (UTC)

Involved parties

[edit]

Articles involved

[edit]

Other steps in dispute resolution that have been attempted:

[edit]

Issues to be mediated

[edit]
  • Whether the following paragraph should be added to the Rush Limbaugh article in a new section, "Detention on return from Dominican Republic," located under "Public life," - "2000s" between "Prescription drug addiction" and "Michael J. Fox comments controversy":
Upon returning from the Dominican Republic on a private jet inJune 2006, Limbaugh was detained at the Palm Beach International Airport when a bottle containing 29 erectile dysfunction pills was found by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in his baggage, prescribed in the name of the physician treating Limbaugh for drug addiction.[1][2][3][4][5] "I had a great time in the Dominican Republic," Limbaugh later joked on his radio program. "Wish I could tell you about it."[6] Limbaugh was not charged with a crime in the incident. [7]

-- Notes for "Issues to be mediated" --

  1. ^ "Rush Limbaugh's Dominican Stag Party". The Smoking Gun. The Smoking Gun. 2006-06-29.
  2. ^ "Rush Limbaugh detained at airport over possession of non-narcotic drug". CNN. CNN. 2006-06-26.
  3. ^ "Limbaugh detained after luggage search produces pills". Palm Beach Post. Palm Beach Post. 2006-06-27.
  4. ^ "Limbaugh case alerts travelers to rules for prescriptions". USA TODAY. USA TODAY. 2006-06-26.
  5. ^ "Rush Limbaugh detained in Florida over Viagra pills". Reuters. 2006-06-27.
  6. ^ "Rush Limbaugh Detained With Viagra". CBS/AP. CBS/Associated Press. 2004-06-27.
  7. ^ "Limbaugh is Cleared in Viagra Case". The Baltimore Sun. The Baltimore Sun. 2006-07-06.

Additional issues to be mediated

[edit]
  • N/A

Parties' agreement to mediate

[edit]
All parties should sign below, indicating that they agree to mediate the issue. If any party fails to sign, or if a party indicates they do not agree, then the mediation will be rejected. Only signatures and "agree" or "disagree" should appear here; any comments will be removed.
  1. Agree. Kpedsea 02:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
  2. Agree. Caper13 03:00, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Agree. --ElKevbo 03:02, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't going anywhere and I don't think I'm even a party to these discussions or this dispute. Kpedsea has more than adequately proven his or her case and this RfM has sat idle for several weeks. I'm withdrawing from this RfM. Best of luck to everyone who sticks around if this ever actually gets started back up! --ElKevbo 16:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Agree. --PTR 16:32, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Agree. --Rtrev 16:44, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Agree. --Gregmg 15:58, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Agree. KimmyChanga 02:05, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Agree. Lurker oi! 15:49, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Decision of the Mediation Committee

[edit]
  • Accept:
For the Mediation Committee, Shyam (T/C) 16:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I can take this one as well. -Ste|vertigo 08:46, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.