Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 May 5

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:23, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Town of Hranice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

almost all redlinks. Frietjes (talk) 23:30, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, recreate when more articles exist (preferably more than just the town and its three suburbs). – filelakeshoe (t / c)  11:56, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per WP:EXISTING. — Wyliepedia 12:50, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was withdrawn. Kharkiv07^Talk 23:03, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DRN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

It was decided at the dispute resolution noticeboard's talk page that banners are rarely seen by regular editors, and a notification on talk would be more effective, so Template:DRN-talk was created to replace this. Kharkiv07^Talk 23:23, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There has been no consensus at the DRN noticeboard in regards to the habits of regular editors. I believe someone might have mentioned the subject of regulars and what they look at, but I don't think we would try to decide the habits of contributors. Having optional tools is always helpful, but we shouldn't delete different templates that serve a different purpose just because a new template is created. Lets at least wait and see if either template gets much use before attempting a deletion. Thanks.--Mark Miller (talk) 22:48, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ivory Coast national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only three matches. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • That's not quite what the closing comment of that discussion says. PC78 (talk) 19:27, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • The closing comment is actually not a very good summary of the actual consensus reached in the discussion. It bares reading the whole thing. - Ahunt (talk) 23:37, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have and I think it's a fair summary. There is no concensus there that explicitly prohibits the use of WP:NENAN in a deletion argument. PC78 (talk) 23:45, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Consensus in this short discussion is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:59, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Czech Republic national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only one match. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South Korea national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only three matches. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:49, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sweden national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only two matches. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:55, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:04, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Israel national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only one match. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:53, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tunisia national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only one match. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:52, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sudan national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only two matches. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ethiopia national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only two matches. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Argentina national under-23 football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only three articles, none of which are specifically matches of the Argentinian U-23 team, merely competitions in which they played. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:49, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:48, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:China national football team matches (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Per WP:NENAN, links to only two matches. Not a useful aid to navigation at this stage. Fenix down (talk) 14:47, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: You are probably unaware, but by a large consensus WP:NENAN can no longer be used as an argument for deletion of templates. - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - not enough blue links to justify a navigation template (at this stage i.e. no prejudice to it being re-created in future if further populated with notable bluelinks). GiantSnowman 17:13, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per GiantSnowman: a navbox that is mostly red links does not serve the function of a navbox in facilitating reader navigation among existing, related articles per WP:EXISTING. NENAN essay is irrelevant. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 15:00, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.