View text source at Wikipedia


Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 March 8

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 22:36, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig(talk) 21:12, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 20:12, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As with the the one below, this has no clear use, and the only transclusion in the mainspace does not seem to fulfill any reasonably intended purpose. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 21:08, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G2 by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 20:12, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Eeeehhhhhhh This template does not look very useful – probably because it isn't. It has two mainspace transclusions, which seem to need to be cleaned up. 𝟙𝟤𝟯𝟺𝐪𝑤𝒆𝓇𝟷𝟮𝟥𝟜𝓺𝔴𝕖𝖗𝟰 (𝗍𝗮𝘭𝙠) 20:55, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Subst/Delete Produces the text "Template:Date=February 2019". or perhaps just delete as nonsense. 21:27, 8 March 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigej (talkcontribs)
  • Fix and delete' Should not be subst. This is from vandalism, look at the text in the article "{{date=February 2019 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}". Readd the {{dead link}} template Christian75 (talk) 11:07, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:58, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig(talk) 20:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 19:57, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Team is defunct, so the template is no longer required. Craig(talk) 18:34, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template cruft; poorly created Mvcg66b3r (talk) 16:07, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Izno (talk) 17:52, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Only connected by the Caribbean aspect. Doesn't seem to be article about "American television channel owned stations in Caribbean", so fails WP:NAVBOX. EWTN fails to mention the word Caribbean, no seems a tenuous connection. Nigej (talk) 09:38, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template says "Still no champions" and since the BWF World Superseries finished in 2017, there won't ever be any. Nigej (talk) 11:05, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Musical artist navigation template that no longer serves a purpose as the albums it contains are now redirects. Lennart97 (talk) 10:38, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was closed. Target discussion was closed. Izno (talk) 17:24, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Current name Target name

Propose renaming Template:Cite conference to Template:Cite presentation.

 – Pointer to relevant discussion elsewhere.

Please see Help talk:Citation Style 1/Archive 75#Requested move 8 March 2021.
I'm cross-listing this here due to the significance of the template. The move shouldn't be discussed here, but at the RM. Also testing {{Tfr}}, though this isn't an ideal test-case for it, since this isn't a TfR being principally listed here, just as a cross-reference.  — SMcCandlish ¢ 😼  02:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.