View text source at Wikipedia


Wikipedia:WikiProject Food and drink/Tools/sources

100pt WikiProject

Food and Drink

 Source list

HomeTalk pageMembersOpen tasksAssessmentShowcaseToolsTemplatesStub templatesNewsletters
Foods
Foods

An annotated list of sources for food and drink articles. The goal is to help editors find reliable sources of information on food topics. This page is intended to provide sources that are useful for multiple articles. Of course, individual articles' bibliographies should also be useful.

Cookbooks

[edit]

Since Wikipedia is not a cookbook, the question is how useful cookbooks are not for recipes, but for the description and history of food. In general, they are fairly good about description, though they can be idiosyncratic and provincial, being unaware of food habits outside their authors' neighborhood. They also tend to be trendy. Cookbooks are generally very weak for history. Very rarely have the authors consulted serious sources, and they tend to repeat legends and folklore freely.

Encyclopedias and References

[edit]
Probably the best all-round encyclopedia of food. Many articles have useful bibliographies. Especially strong on English and western European foods. Benefits from the years of articles in Petits Propos Culinaires and the Oxford Symposia on Food.
An excellent collection of articles.
The standard reference for the science of foods.
A good source for 19th and early 20th century French cooking. Very unreliable outside France. Unreliable for history (the notorious croissant legend was first published here).
Said to be improved over the first for non-French food.
A small, eclectic anthology of articles from the Annales
Pretty good popular history.
Mostly traditional French recipes. No source notes. Not very useful.
A totally unreliable source, full of legends and misinformation. She doesn't footnote most of what she writes, so there's no way of verifying it. Do not use.

Journals, magazines, proceedings

[edit]

Most popular magazines (Gourmet, Bon Appetit, Fine Cooking, Cook's Illustrated, Saveur, etc.), regardless of how good their recipes are, do not emphasize accurate research into the background and history of foods.

Particular cuisines

[edit]

Europe

[edit]

Middle East

[edit]
Excellent collection of good articles.
Though this is a cookbook, it has taken its historical research more seriously than most cookbooks.

China

[edit]
Good scholarly overview of history.

England

[edit]
Good scholarly treatment.

France

[edit]
Good journalistic survey.
Excellent scholarly treatment.

(see also Mennell, under England)

Germany

[edit]

Greece

[edit]
An amazing summary of classical and Byzantine Greek texts on food. Scholarly, careful, comprehensive. The Ottoman and modern periods are very briefly touched on at the end.

Italy

[edit]
Good journalistic survey.
Good survey.

Ireland

[edit]
Mahon worked for the Irish Folklore Commission.
Teagasc is an Irish semi-state authority responsible for research in the agri-food sector. Regina Sexton is an Irish food historian at University College Cork.
This is not a very reliable source - not properly referenced/footnoted, and re-telling a lot of Bríd Mahon's work in a superficial way.

Japan

[edit]

Mexico

[edit]

Russia

[edit]
A very authentic and thorough (though sadly not illustrated) coverage of traditional recipes, including those of the former republics of the Soviet Union. Chapters for each type of meal (appetizer, soup, salad, meat by type) and holiday menus. Includes brief cultural and historical introductions.

Thailand

[edit]

United States

[edit]
Mostly social history around the year 1900

Vietnam

[edit]

By category of food

[edit]

Seafood & fish

[edit]
Fabulous resources on the fish and seafood of their regions. A summary page per species including both biology and cuisine. Also a collection of recipes.

Web resources

[edit]

There are many Web resources on food, many of them plagiarized from each other, with little reliable information, and rarely any source notes.