Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea/Assessment

	This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Korea This page is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related

I think this doesn't provide enough detail; it feels weird to mark so many articles as "low importance." Thinking of a new scale like this:

1st class. A key entry point to Coreana. (= current "Top") Examples: Korea, Korean Peninsula, North Korea, South Korea.

2nd class. High-profile or central articles. Includes individuals with a very high international profile, primary administrative divisions, keystone articles for major categories. Examples: Seoul, Economy of North Korea, Ban Ki-moon.

3rd class. Major topics. Includes higher-profile individuals, most secondary administrative divisions, any category-main articles. Examples: Gyeongju, Korean name.

4th class. High granularity, covering a small topic area. Includes lower-profile individuals, most tertiary administrative divisions. Examples: Yulha-dong, Jjigae.

5th class. Extremely high granularity, covering a very small topic area. Likely to be difficult to expand, and may be a candidate for merging into a broader article. Examples: Jipyeong-ri, Budae jjigae.

-- Visviva 13:57, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Have implemented the above. -- Visviva 10:39, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why not use the standard assessment color codes? -- Prove It ^(talk) 14:25, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, those colours were chosen solely by me, when I updated {{Korean}} with the previous scales. After adapting the standard, I decided to leave those colours, because they are similar to the standard (except for FA). Do you think it is necessary to use the standard? eDenE 01:27, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's preferable but certainly not necessary. It makes no difference at all for those who work only on the Korea project, but if they contribute to multiple projects its a distraction ... particularly now that some pages are showing the official statistics. -- Prove It ^(talk) 15:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]