View text source at Wikipedia


Talk:Japanese occupation of West Sumatra

Missing refs

[edit]

@Kaliper1: Your edit here added references that do not connect to any citations, thereby creating Sfn/Harv errors. Can you please fix them and any others that may have been caused on this page? I'm not familiar with this article to do it myself. Thank you. —GoldRingChip 20:14, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GoldRingChip: Thank you for the heads up. All proceeding Sfn/Harv errors should be all resolved by now. Cheers, Kaliper1 (talk) 11:11, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Kaliper1: Thank you for addressing them. There are a few more refs with the hidden error: "There is no link pointing to this citation":
* {{cite web |title=Audrey Kahin: Writing Minangkabau History |url=http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2014/01/22/audrey-kahin-writing-minangkabau-history.html |last=Syofyan |first=Donny |date=22 January 2014 |accessdate=11 June 2016 |work=[[The Jakarta Post]] |ref={{sfnRef|The Jakarta Post|22 Januari 2014}}}}
* {{cite web |title=Lima Bulan Sukarno di Padang |url=http://historia.id/modern/lima-bulan-sukarno-di-padang |last= |first= |date=7 June 2016 |accessdate=9 June 2016 |work=Historia |ref={{sfnRef|Historia|7 Juni 2016}}}}
* (A duplicate ref?): {{Cite book |title=Sejarah perjuangan kemerdekaan R.I. di Minangkabau/Riau, 1945-1950 |date=1991 |publisher=Badan Pemurnian Sejarah Indonesia-Minangkabau |isbn=978-979-405-126-9 |editor-last=Husein |editor-first=Ahmad |edition=Cet. 2., dengan perbaikan |location=Jakarta |editor-last2=Badan Pemurnian Sejarah Indonesia-Minangkabau}}
If you add the scripts at User:Trappist the monk/HarvErrors you will see them. —GoldRingChip 13:22, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Done Kaliper1 (talk) 16:09, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Too long!

[edit]

The article is oversized. Consider splitting off sections or trimming excessive detail. Srnec (talk) 18:35, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

[edit]


I've listed this article for peer review because... I've viewed that the article has been written to my best and furthest capabilities. I view that it requires peer review to better its comprehensiveness from the different point of view, input, and feedback of others. Possibly, interested in reaching FA status.

Thank you, Kaliper1 (talk) 16:47, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]