View text source at Wikipedia
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors:
The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error |
Apologizes if there is a better place to do this, but I do think the entire '2000s' section should be rewritten. I've done some temporary fixes and changes in the meantime, but a more thorough rewrite would greatly increase the quality of the article. Or do people think just some general tone improvement and citations is enough?
Little Note:
The Michael Hofmann of 1860 Munich is not the same as the author/translator of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Hofmann
B-class "It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited." => there are absolutly no inline refs, imho this is not B. Sorry. Greetings. Sebastian scha. (talk) 16:59, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
I'm looking for a group of people who would like to do operate a TSV 1860 München Task Force for WikiProject Munich. Please contact me if you would like to be involved. Kingjeff (talk) 16:05, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
From what I can ascertain from reading the article, had they not already ground-shared for 30 years with Bayern at the Olympiastadion? Needs clarifying. --Jamieli (talk) 22:11, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
I started a discussion here. Kingjeff (talk) 06:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 19:01, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
– User:Kingjeff moved the article to TSV 1860 Munich but I reverted this move on the grounds that the move of a relatively high profile German football article should have consensus, especially when it has been, as much as I can see, at the current name for the duration of the articles existence, 12 years. I also objected to the article being moved while the categories were left at the old name with no effort made to initiate a move. Kingjeff's argument that it should be at the English title has however some merit as it would follow Wikipedia:Naming conventions (sports teams). In regards to my own opinion I'm neutral in regards to the article title, either suits me provided related articles and categories carry the same name. A discussion was started at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football but, I fell, the articles talk page is the better location. Calistemon (talk) 08:20, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
I couldn't find any official english website. Therefore, the first point can't really have any influence in the discussion since they don't have an english website. Here, here, and here are three examples where the media clearly has Munich instead of München. The second point favour the switch. I don't see anything confusing with the switch. Kingjeff (talk) 05:27, 29 April 2016 (UTC)