User talk:AjaxSmack

This talk page is becoming very long. Consider archiving inactive discussions.

 AjaxSmack 

User Statistics at XTools by these folks

User Statistics at User Analysis Tool by User:cyberpower678 (formerly X!'s Edit Counter by User:TParis)

User Subpages 1 and 2

User Interwiki Accounts

Editing Help Page

---

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, AjaxSmack! My name is Ryan, aka Acetic Acid. I noticed that you were new and haven't received any messages yet. I just wanted to see how you were doing. Wikipedia can be a little intimidating at first, since it uses different formatting than other sites that use HTML and CSS. In the long run, though, you'll find that the WikiSyntax is a lot easier and faster than those other ways. Here are a few links to get you started:

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article

There are a lot of policies and guides to read, but I highly recommend reading over those first. If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Please be sure to sign your name on Talk Pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, along with a link to your user page. This way, others know when you left a message and how to find you. It's easier than having to type out your name, right? :)

I hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. We can use all the help we can get! Have a nice day. Sincerely, Ryan 01:03, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Please do not remove factual text from articles. If the wording appears to be biased but is nonetheless factual, please instead reword it to a more neutral phrasing. More info at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Lack_of_neutrality_as_an_excuse_to_delete and Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view#Rewording_a_potentially_biased_statement. Thank you. --Pascal666 04:12, 13 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I saw a commercial on TV the other day where Donald Trump made a comment along the lines of "my hair is recognized the world over". I got curious what that meant, the article on him said nothing about his hair. Finally found on other websites that he had a comb over described with different synonyms for horrendous. I agree the sentence needs to be changed, but I would like to keep a link to comb over somewhere on Donald Trump, as that is the information I was looking for and did not find. I can't comment on the other paragraph. --Pascal666 04:27, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Perfect. Thank you. --Pascal666 18:55, 14 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

All sounds reasonable. In all of the cases that are a matter of naming, my main concern is that all the reasonable redirects are there and all the names are mentioned in the article. I don't really care where the article resides.

The Province of Bessarabia and Ottoman Bessarabia might as well be merged, they do seem to cover the same topic (both badly). Ottoman Bessarabia currently reads more like a dispute than an article. We might as well sort out the mess in one place rather than two. -- Jmabel | Talk 00:55, 21 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding naming, I have a slight inclination toward Yedisan. I have usually read about this rarely-mentioned region in German (Jedisan), but in English it would be pronounced Yedisan. Edisan brings up the most Google hits, but none of them seem relevant to the region here. Olessi 17:24, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I have added Names & History subheaders to the article and copyedited some of it. I tried to rephrase the mentioning of "Nogai Tartary" and "West Nogai"; please correct it if I misinterpreted your meaning. Olessi 20:17, 14 December 2005 (UTC1)

Hello LuiKhuntek! I would like to remind you to vote on moves that you have proposed, like Bugeac and Podilia. Even though you proposed the moves, that doesn't mean that administrators will automatically count you as a support vote. It is better to add your name to the support section to be sure. Have a good day! Olessi 18:31, 3 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Huge kab like 103.138.11.13 (talk) 17:50, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am by now so tired of being assumed to be a chuavinist anti-foreign langauge Westerner every time I try to argue for less use of needlees foreign syllabaries and alphabets that I've had enough. I've removed your undue and uncivil sarcasm at Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions#No hangul, please, and I'm urging you to restate your arguments in a reasoned and enlightened fashion instead of trying to engage in pure squabbling.

Peter ^Isotalo 11:02, 18 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year! As I remember we never exchanged the data on Arabian monarchies from 'Almanach de Bruxelles' I mentioned when discussing the Aden protectorates, here they are (239kb). As it were private copies, I had made some minor changes and additional notes (even some in my native Dutch), but no changes to worry about; I'm not sure whether I also deleted some genealogical parts, unfortunately. Apparently some Word features suffer from the transfer to this medium, but that's only the presentation.

Please copy them to your PC and then IMMEDIATELY remove them from this talk page, since they may not be fit for Internet access as such. Hopefully they help you to make some more contributions in 2006.

Why are you opposing the move from Nuovo Cinema Paradiso to Nuovo cinema Paradiso? WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 08:59, 2 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, sorry about that. I guess I was mistaken. --Khoikhoi 23:51, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn this move request. I think that both Gov't and Politic pages should remain the same until the information on these pages is more developed and warrants a page split.

On a different note, you may wish to participate in this more interesting debate. - Spaceriqui 22:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Members ALTAF JACK STYLES (talk) 08:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that Polesie is the well established name in English usage and inventing a new name is not appropriate for wp. I'll rephrase. --_Lysy^talk 08:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to leave you a note that the rules of the vote at Talk:List of German concentration camps have slightly changed since you've voted there and it's likely that you might want to reconsider your vote. --_Lysy^talk 20:32, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great, please proceed! My original list I believe was based upon Colin Imber's "The Ottoman Empire", but I haven't kept tabs on the article and thus I cannot answer for the current version. As long as no information is lost, I believe reorganizing the article would be a really good thing. /The Phoenix 09:54, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I greatly appreciate your courtesy, and certainly would like us to make good use of those data you mention. (As I still believe there is a point in having a single 'master list' that would for example allow readers to look up the Ottoman provinces without knowing where they are, from which links should in time be provided to appropriate historical sections for each, possibly with a mini-history in telegram style (at least aquisition, status changes such as gubernatorial style, loss, mergers) I strongly feel we'ld probably do best to provide both this geographically organized list -I would then also go further to accomodate orientation by modern states and regions- and next a few 'freezes' in time as you intend, which I for one would certainly appreciate- thus we cater for various uses: browing or oversight. As I have a long watchlist and often try to use data both in a pivotal page as our case and various other ones (such as cases of units, titles...) I suspect my work on the 'master list' (any ideas for an actual section name?) will progress slowly, so I suggest you don't wait for it to create a section for case oversights, but I think our combined efforts should result in an exciting page in due time).

As I reread your message, I realize I wrote the above (now in parenthesis) as if you just meant lists, but the word chart may well stand for something far more elaborate and structured, while I'm not sure how that would look- so I wonder if it would be possible to see a sample, I may well have to reconsider the above first reaction altogether.

As I tried to save the above, an edit conflict alerted me The Phoenix just gave his okay. Indeed, as long as no data get lost we should be able to figure it out. It seems like we're on to a good thing!

P.S. May I, be the way, remind you of my request to remove the data under number five on this page, which contain the (formerly free) Almanach de Bruxelles data we talked about while editing Aden Protectorate, after copying them if f any use? I'm realy not comfortable with keeping them openly on a Wikipedia-page Fastifex 10:38, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I also highly encourage revising the info at Subdivisions. I can try to expand upon it with information from Magocsi. Olessi 18:18, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have expressed opposition to your proposed long names for the Ottoman provinces. I dislike long names, and ones that don't fit into running text. I detest most efforts at imposing uniformity on WP, which is inconsistent. If you must force uniformity, I would prefer (of the two choices), moving Basra Province, Ottoman Empire into Basra Province, with a dab header to the Iraqi Governorate (and so on); Basra province might be better. (And what's wrong with vilayet, which seems to have been the contemporary usage in English?) Septentrionalis 21:28, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to vote on your Talk:Bergen-Belsen rename request? LuiKhuntek 15:49, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your message, LuiKhuntek. I thought it was likely to go against Wikipedia policy to vote for your own Requested Move, but is this not so? (Seems odd if not!)  Best wishes, David Kernow 20:40, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if it's against policy or not...

Intriguing. I realise I've always assumed it would be. But I've just left a vote there and at least one other user (Lysy) hasn't been taken aback! David Kernow 20:53, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do other wikipedians a favour and start using edit summaries. Thanks, Ghirla | talk 09:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I was wrong about this. I thought that Sanjak of Smederevo was an earlier province that existed there before the Austrian administration (1718-1739), and that Pashaluk of Belgrade was a new province that was formed after 1739. However, I looked at some sources, so the Pashaluk of Belgrade was in fact alternative name of the Sanjak of Smederevo, but used more often in the Serbian historiography. Also, I found that the administrative seat was moved from Smederevo to Belgrade in 1521. Can you tell me to which time period refer this part of the article (which you wrote there): "Belgrade had been the center of the region under Austrian rule but was neglected under the Ottomans and Smederevo (Semendire) was the administrative center. Nevertheless, Belgrade eventually became the seat of a pasha with the title of vizier and the Sanjak began to be referred to as the Pashaluk of Belgrade, although it was still called the Sanjak of Smederevo in official documents." Does it refer to 1521 perhaps or to some other year? As for the Eyalet of Temeşvar, I think that current shorter name is better. We do not need too long names for the articles. PANONIAN (talk) 01:25, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

Could you please vote again here if you want:

• Talk:Timişoara Province, Ottoman Empire

PANONIAN (talk) 01:26, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

---

I think you may be interested in checking this new article. I placed a {NPOV} tag there. --Ghirla | talk 13:27, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello LuiKhuntek! As you are a contributor who has frequently worked on central and eastern European topics, you might be interested in the recently-created noticeboard for articles concerning German-related topics. Feel free to participate with the project if you are interested! Olessi 01:48, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the heads-up on voting procedures on moving pages. This is actually my first time moving pages via administrator's aid, and I didn't know the procedure quite well. Deiaemeth 22:22, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You should vote on your proposed move at Talk:Baitou Mountain. Nominations are not always counted as a vote. LuiKhuntek 22:18, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I didn't propose that page for moving. --Fibonacci 00:46, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Your tag appeared along with another at the nomination here: Wikipedia:Requested_moves#13_February_2006. Wasn't sure who owned it... LuiKhuntek 03:01, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for notifying me. I have now removed my signature from that nomination. --Fibonacci 03:10, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should have a look at the doings of some anti-Arab Christian activists who designed a totally inaccurate and propagandist Syriacs box, mentioning Maronites and Melkites as ethnically "Syriacs", thus non-Arabs, which I proposed for deletion here. There are non-Arab Christians in the region, be they Armenians or Assyrians, but these fanatics include Arabized Christians in their anti-Arab dreams. Pylambert 23:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I checked the translations and everything seems to be correct. About Gradiščanska, I have to admit I don't recall ever hearing about the region around Gradisca being reffered to as Gradiščanska in Slovenian, but then again I don't recall hearing it at all. However I did check the Enciklopedija Slovenije, and it is mentioned a couple of times, so I'm guessing the name is correct. edolen1 16:27, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the article, I'm from a village that belonged to that county and it was on my to do list. I've expanded a little bit about culture, I hadn0t so much time so I think there are quite a few errors, anyway I plan to expand it more if I'll have some spare time--Klenje 13:13, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Saw your work on China rivers. Thanks for the clean-up. One thing you deleted that I have a question about is the little explanation of the different parts of Changjiang. Should'nt there be something to explain that Yangzte, Changjiang, and Jinsha are different eyt the same? Just my opinion.Mike 19:26, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• The river question... haven't noticed any discussion about the format. I just started addding to the majority format at the time... which was for many the entire Chinese name including he, shui, or jiang + River. Of course that doesn't make much sense. I'm cool with how you changed it. No use being redundant... again and again.Mike 13:28, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure whether we should go with the Chinese name with the Chinese word for river included, or with just the name and then river in English.Mike 01:09, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • I aggree... river name then "River". Do you think that since it's a list of rivers in China we should use the Chinese name and the international norm name too?Mike 01:55, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind lending your opinion to a content dispute that I am currently involved in on University of South Carolina. As you may know, USC has a strong rivalry with Clemson University. I feel that the athletics section of the article should discuss this rivalry, and I feel that this discussion should include a reference to the overall record between the two schools in various major sports. Other editors have disagreed, and feel that the record should not be mentioned. As it happens, Clemson leads in two of the discussed sports and USC leads in the third. I would appreciate it if you would consider lending your opinion on this issue on Talk:University of South Carolina. Thanks! Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 00:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification! -- thunderboltz^{a.k.a.Deepu_Joseph |TALK} 05:08, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ajax, I wanted to let you know that I have nominated Arlington County, Virginia as a candidate for US Collaboration of the Week. The article is in need of much help and with a little group effort, it could be brought to Featured Article status! I brought this to your attention as I have seen you have contributed to the article in the recent past. Please cast your vote with your signature at the US Collaboration of the Week page under Arlington County, Virginia. --Caponer 01:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, we're up and running at Wikipedia:WikiProject Virginia Highways. --MPD01605 01:29, 10 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a move request under discussion at Talk:House of Karadjordjević Henq 09:42, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ajax. Ive noticed by your edits to the Gibraltar page that you can transliterate arabic using the proper letters (with the dots under the T ect...)When you have the time, could you have a look at the article Arabic influence on the Spanish language and maybe give me a hand with the transliteration? Thanks alot.

Guzman.

Thanks alot for the list Ajax!

Thank you for notifying me about the voting. Adam78 19:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you AjaxSmack for informing me about the Names of European cities in different languages deletion proposal.--Pjetër Bogdani III 13:10, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please see my question at Talk:Budjak#Cyrillic? Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 18:39, 22 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. - Jmabel | Talk 02:32, 24 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- I rerequested to move of "State Great Khural" to "State Great Hural" that you opposed -- just thought I should let you know in case you want to vote again. Joriki 10:34, 29 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

As a past participant in the discussion on how to handle the Georgia pages, I thought you might be interested to know that there's a new attempt to reach consensus on the matter being addressed at Talk:Georgia (country)#Requested_Move_-_July_2006. Please come by and share your thoughts to help form a consensus. --Vengeful Cynic 04:19, 8 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

move request Talk:John II Casimir of Poland

AjaxSmack, your participation is welcome in the Wikipedia:State route naming conventions poll. Please give your input as to the process by 23:59 UTC on August 8.

Regards, Rschen7754 (talk - contribs) 22:58, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What is this [1], Ajax? "Currently"? Were you not careful when you were writing this into the article, or you have had bad intentions?
I hope you weren't careful enough. Kubura 23:49, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure 箍 = 塊 in Taiwanese? I think 箍 means something else. [2] --Chochopk 05:23, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics/Style, currency unit should use local form, e.g. Chinese wen, not Chinese cash. If you have any concern, please discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Numismatics. --Chochopk 07:52, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your point. But this is rather an old topic. I think the style guide implies transliterating into Latin alphabets if the local language is not. If you still have concern, please go to the numismatic discuss page. --Chochopk 08:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello :) I noticed that in this edit http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Khwarezm&diff=32488817&oldid=32341386 you changed Kuali to Guali. Could you put in the authentic original Chinese characters for this transliteration and a source on the same article please? Many thanks.

You are a god!

I did what I could. I turned it into one box, instead of five small boxes. Here's what you need to do though: find a way to make a separation (such as a blank space or black line) between the various 'end' and 'beginning' sections, so that it doesn't look so overwhelming. The shields need to be changed, too, but I can work on this if you'll take care of cleaning up the article in general. --MPD01605 (T / C) 06:42, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating the article! I'll try to add some info from the German wiki in the future. Olessi 05:18, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have my answer here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Križevci_(former_county) The move of the names was discussed and the reasons are explained there. PANONIAN (talk) 18:27, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In Arabic, "jama'" means "mosque" or "the place where people gather". It most likely refers to the Old Central Mosque not the city itself, as older natives simply call it "the jama'" or "the mosque" (according to the Wikipedia entry). However, there's no mention for this in the link you showed me. That article mentioned some of the famous mosques in Nizwa like "the famous jama' of Nizwa" and "jama' sa'al". If you'd like me to translate that article, drop me a line. ~MK (talk) 05:00, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for spamming your talk page, but since you had contributed in the past to the WP:NC(GN) proposal, which is currently ready for a wider consultation, I thought you might want to give it another look now and, hopefully, suggest some final improvements. Thanks. --Lysy^talk 22:56, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I fully intend to see restored the minimal details you deleted on individual states. A list of Arabic names without any details makes about as much sence as a laundy list in Martian (except to those who already know). Fastifex 23:23, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, but where did you find references regarding the unincorporated towns? I live in the Hampton Roads/Tidewater area (Chesapeake for the last two years), and I cannot find any references to these being unincorporated towns. All real estate deeds, maps, etc etc ad infinitum refer to the city proper (Chesapeake vice Great Bridge, Virginia Beach vice Kempsville). Locals refer to the area by community name, owing back to the days prior to city incorporation, but that is for historical reference and community pride vice any legal entity. Even the wikipedia entry for Great Bridge lists it as a community. I wanted to touch base with you first before I remove those entries.

Supersquid 23:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

By definition, unincorporated towns are not legal entities. None of the other towns on the list are legal entities either. You are correct that they are communities and as Wikipedia notes, a town is a "a residential community of people ranging from a few hundred to several thousands." It's just that the word community is extremely vague ("a group of people who interact and share certain things as a group") and the word town narrows the scope of the list to populated places that are not in the incorporated places lists at List of towns in Virginia and List of cities in Virginia. - AjaxSmack 23:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Ehhh that seems like a really slippery slope... if it isn't a city or incorporated town, then it's an unincorporated town, is what I take from that. Heh, then that list is woefully incomplete, because it leaves out places like Pungo, Blackwater, Uniontown, Back Bay, North Landing, Centerville... and these are just the places around where I live :-)

But I disagree that they're towns. They may have been (I know Pungo was) but in 1963 the entire county of Princess Anne was consolidated as the Independent City of Virginia Beach. In fact, if you read further down on the definition of town, in Virginia it states

In Virginia, a town is an incorporated municipality similar to a city (though with a smaller required minimum population), but while cities are by Virginia law independent of counties, towns are contained within a county.

By that definition, since Chesapeake, Virginia Beach, Suffolk, Newport News, Hampton, and Portsmouth are all independent cities with no corresponding county, the communities in the list are not unincorporated and therefore shouldn't be on the list.

Supersquid 00:26, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The passage you cite above refers to incorporated towns, i.e. those on the List of towns in Virginia. You're right that the list is woefully incomplete. That's why there's a Template:Virginia-stub tag at the bottom. The solution is to add Pungo, Blackwater, Whaleyville, etc. to the list. Otherwise, by your reasoning, the entire list should be deleted because none of the places on it are incorporated. (If you're worried about the list becoming too long, note the dearth of editing activity since its creation. If it does become a problem, the line "list of important population centers" is a green light to cull.) - AjaxSmack 00:40, 23 September 2006 (UTC)

I dunno... I say that Yorktown is a perfect example to what I feel truly merits definition of an unincorporated town. Small population, no independent municipal government (ie no mayor, no city police) in a specific county (in this case, York County). Whaleyville has actually been incorporated into the Independent City of Suffolk, which does have it's own police force, it's own mayor, etc etc. Check out Census-designated place.

I'm not worried overly about the length of the list... and it's hard to determine what is considered admissible in a "list of important population centers." I figured if we went with the definition of actual Census Designated Places (aka unincorporated towns) then we keep the list accurate. Let's move this to the article's discussion page (where it should be... don't mean to clutter your user talk page lol), and maybe we can get some other user's inputs on this and make it worthy of Wikipedia.

Supersquid 01:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think it means Land of the English. Beled (بلد) means country or land. But I'm not so sure about the meaning of Ingris. Some people, especially in Arabia, (informally) call the English people Ingris instead of Inglis (إنجليز). But I searched this on Google and didn't find much results. ~MK (talk) 13:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think "de-piped pig link" was one of my better edit summaries. Ben-w 22:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate your advising me that Skåneland, once again, is up for renaming discusson. Somewhere in the history we've lost the last debate, but I've resurrected some of the material. Skål - Williamborg (Bill) 05:20, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm changing it to the State Route style in accordance with WP:USSH. --NE2 23:44, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The plan (if the move vote passes, as it looks like it will) is to split the 'Passing' section from Pass to become the disambig page for 'Passing'. That covers 'Overtaking'. --AliceJMarkham 23:28, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the plan changed ever so slightly. I ended up reverting the split of 'Passing' from Pass and redirecting 'Passing' to 'Pass'. A couple of us got very enthusiastic about cleaning up the rather cluttered 'Pass' page. Much tidier all round if you ask me. :) --AliceJMarkham 07:59, 3 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Most of the those maps are not very old. They show Al-Ahsa as an Imara (principality) before the unification of Saudi Arabia. Al-Ahsa and most of the current main regions of Saudi Arabia were seperate in the past (19th and early 20th centuries). However, if you look at this older map [3], you'll notice the (yellow) region I was talking about.

"Bahrain up until 1521 comprised the bigger region of Ahsa, Qatif (both are now the eastern province of Saudi Arabia) as well as Awal (now Bahrain Islands). The region stretched from what is now Kuwait to Oman. This was Iqlim Al-Bahrain (Province of Bahrain). In 1521, the Portuguese separated Awal (now Bahrain) from the rest and since then the name of Bahrain specifically referred to today’s Bahrain." from [4].

"In early Islamic history, the name Bahrain applied loosely to the area embracing the oases of Hasa and Qatif on the eastern coast of Arabia as well as to the archipelago lying just a few miles offshore. Later the name came to be restricted to the islands." from [5] (also read more of that article and you'll find out how Al-Ahsa became a part of Saudi Arabia).

"In 287/900, the Qarmatians acquired control of Hajar, the seat of the Abbasid governor. The Abbasid caliph Mutadid (d. 289/902) sent an army of 2000 men against them, but were defeated. In 290/903, Hajar was finally subdued after a long siege laid by Abu Sa'id. He established his headquarters at al-Ahsa (or al-Lahsa), which became the capital of the Jannabid rule of the Qarmatians of Bahrain in 314/926." from [6].

See also: [7]. —MK (talk) 15:39, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree with you, but I think that using two different spellings (for Al-Ahsa/Hasa) isn't correct. However, both of them are acceptable transliterations, and both of them are used (in the past and at the moment). There's only one way to write the word in Arabic (الأحساء), but the pronunciation varies from a dialect to another. In formal Arabic, it's pronounced Al-Ahsa'. However, people there (in Al-Ahsa) call it El-Hasa. So I think it's better that Wikipedia sticks with one of them.

Al-Ahsa is the plural of Hessi (حسي), which means the rocky ground that is covered by a sandy layer, which stores rainwater. It was called Al-Ahsa because it had many of those grounds. Previously, it was called Hajr wal-Bahrain (هجر والبحرين), and then Ahsa' bani Sa'ad (أحساء بني سعد). Between 500 B.C. and 300 A.D., the principality of Al-Jarha (إمارة الجرهاء) existed on its lands. This was taken from [8].

As a side note, I'd like to tell you that I visited Al-Ahsa more than once last year. I noticed that InterContinental, which was probably the best hotel there, called their branch Al-Ahsa in English (see [9]). But still, many other sources call it Al-Hasa or whatever else. For example, Google translates it to Hassa, which is also an acceptable transliteration. If you search for it using Google, you'll find a variety of transliterations (google:الأحساء).

To sum up, I don't think that using two different spellings for this region here is an accurate thing. This happens to almost all Arabic names, even the most famous ones. The reason is that usually there's no one official/general way to write Arabic words in English. Personally, I think that Al-Ahsa is the closest spelling to the formal Arabic pronunciation, but I don't consider other spellings wrong. Are you sure of that Al-Hasa/Al-Ahsa refered to two different regions in English? Because I believe that's incorrect. —MK (talk) 13:25, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed you warned Lorenzino about a new proposal of moving Lombard (lnguistics) page back to its natural title of Lombard language. Many thanks! Anyway, since this vote is still open, I kindly ask you oppose to the original move of Lombard language to Lombard (lnguistics). Sorry for not watching enough. Please, let's keep in touch. Bests, --10caart 11:19, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, would you mind checking out the Partium article to see if it's neutral now? It's gone through a lot of changes since you last edited it. Thanks, Khoikhoi 05:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I totally forgot to vote. Thanks for pointing it out. - TheMightyQuill 05:05, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(1) Have you noticed your talk page is a virginia stub? (2) Re any changing or shifting issues in the Indonesia project - it potentially sets a precedent for the whole WP Indonesia project - so please take this opportunity to look at the project as a whole - or place a comment on the Talk page of the project ratrher than an isloated article. Best wishes SatuSuro 11:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the comments on the two (that we have found so far) regarding the change proposals, thanks SatuSuro 12:21, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• You can find the districts of Kenya here: [10]
• Here are the zones of the Somali region of Ethiopia:[11]
• Here are the districts (woredas) of the Somali region of Ethiopia: [12]
• More Ethiopia maps here [13]
• Here are the regions of Somalia: [14]
• Here are the districts of Somalia: [15]

Thanks a lot for the headsup. I'll do what's necessary.Cameron Nedland 04:03, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Please join us! Chris 07:54, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I'm contacting you because of your involvement with using English instead of foreign terms in articles. A few are trying to "Anglicise" French terms in Wiki articles according to current guidelines but there is some resistance (eg/: "Région => Region"; "Département => Departement"). Your input would be appreciated here page. Thankyou. --Bob 16:05, 18 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AjaxSmack,

You moved a proposal to move because you said you opposed, yet you didn't leave a comment as to why. Mind elobarating more on the issue?

cheers JackSparrow Ninja 02:01, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

After five days with no discussion, this RM could use a simple endorsement. Gene Nygaard 06:14, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page "Palatinate of the Rhine" has been moved to "Palatinate (region)". Navou ^banter / _{review me} 23:07, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The page "Barbarism (grammar)" has been moved to "Barbarism (linguistics)". Navou ^banter / _{review me} 23:10, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please check for redirects if you get a chance. Best regards, Navou ^banter / _{review me} 23:16, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done, but I think there are some double (and triple) redirects left that I don't have time to chase down; please fix when you get a chance. Thanks. Opabinia regalis 23:12, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that Markusseup, John k, you and me are in favour of changing the name into Trentino-Alto Adige. Do we need to start another survey? --Checco 09:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... I don't think it's a bug. Maybe, there was an interwiki conflict? Now, I disabled interwiki removal function in bot. Thans for reporting a bug. - VasilievVV 06:11, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On 10 May, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mongolian barbecue, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

I love Mongolian barbecue and I had no idea about this, but it totally makes sense because I remember it being really popular in Taiwan among my cousins. --howcheng {chat} 18:51, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AjaxSmack, very unfortunately, Mongolian Barbecue was not invented in Taiwan and it's a Japanese cuisine, "Jingisukan" (transliteration of Genghis Khan) invented around 1920s This name appears in a cookbook by 1926 with a first specialty restaurant by 1936. There is already the article on this in Japanese wikipedia [16] and thus I'm going to propose that either this article be moved to Jingisukan or completely rewritten from scratch. Also, the claim that Mongolian soldiers used their shield to cook meat is a fanciful tale invented after dish became popular. Shields that Mongolian troops had used were usually wood and covered with animal skins and thus impossible. --Revth 05:52, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, could you participate in a new poll for Dokdo? The candidates include Liancourt Rocks, Takeshima, and the new Takeshima/Dokdo variations suggested by user:Macgruder. I'm informing you because you voted on the last poll. Thanks. (Wikimachine 18:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack. There is ongoing discussion at the ANI where your name appeared. It is due to your restoration of a merge tag here. As per the ANI discussion, could you please try to leave a comment at the article page whenever you tag or restore {merge}. Thanks on advance. -- FayssalF - ^{Wiki me up®} 20:43, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have anything to add on the discussion about what to call the one that runs through SUEW and DUEW, but I did notice you'd taken time to restructure and thereby to render the existing article more coherent. Needed doing. Thank you. Charles01 05:53, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Ajax - the district(s) I mentioned were for Bozcaada - which now redirects to Bozcaada (district), and Gökçeada - which now redirects to Gökçeada (district). They originally kept going to Tenedos and Imbros, because there were users insisting upon such usage for those that are known under the Turkish (and proper) name - not the historical name(s). It is a 'happy' split, and one I can see the same for the whole "Province of Bolzano-Bozen" and "South Tyrol" conflict. Rarelibra 21:10, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Lithia water, by Vegaswikian (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Lithia water seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Lithia water, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:24, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please find version of text which speak about Banat, Bačka and Baranja so that this is not misleading and PANONIAN stop to play revert games. You are having census data on discussion page. For your information I having many revert wars with PANONIAN like users from Hungary and Romania because of his misleading articles in which he want to show how Vojvodina has always been Serbian land. I will not give you examples of this others discussions and revert wars it is better for you to stay out :)) --Rjecina 01:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I do not see this article like place nationalistic wars. I see 1 nationalistic user which is fighting against others user in his wish to sell his version of truth. With this cultural, polite policy we only support future conflict and new Hitlers which are creating new history to explain future wars. There is only one real history all others can ease become dangerous myths which we must fight. --Rjecina 14:44, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Sorry, now I see it is also used in English. It just seems quite weird for us, people of the Czech Republic, as the term "Moravské Slovensko", Czech equivalent of Moravian Slovakia, is not used in the country. In the Czech Republic, only Slovácko form is commonly used. - Darwinek 11:03, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ajax. I will try to look through the various articles over the next week or so. To be honest, except for superficial edits, I've avoided the UAE. (Both odd and understable, I'd suggest.) I do agree with the broad principal that city and emirate should have their own articles. But it's been a couple of years since I've actually looked them. Marskell 19:42, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AjaxSmack, could you help us move South Tyrol to Province of Bolzano-Bozen as found through our discussions? It requires an admin to move the page because of Province of Bolzano-Bozen existing already. Icsunonove 21:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack, thanks for setting up the discussion. I've put in my $0.02. I more and more like this idea of moving the history content to Tirol. Then having the History of pages redirecting to there, but still have South Tyrol and Alto Adige redirect to Province of BZ (and likewise Trentino to Province of TN). Icsunonove 03:24, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I provided input at the discussion. Also, as I said there, I put top page links to Tyrol (disambiguation) to prevent any potential confusion. Also, I restructured the disamblig page for improved clarity on what are present-day political units and what are historical regions, so you may want to take a look at that. —AldeBaer 11:17, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Yes I know... the same old, boring conflict Italian vs German name, but I think in this case i have the Naming Conventions on my side. Maybe you're interested, Mai-Sachme 16:04, 21 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack, please, please help key an eye on Province of Bolzano-Bozen. We had a great group of editors finally move this page to the multilingual provincial name, as cited in Brittanica (!!). Gryffindor is now having a hissy fit and saying this is the work of some "Italian" sham vote. [17] Gryffindor is going back and reverting edits in mass [18]. I've personally had enough of Gryffindor's abuses on Wikipedia. Please give advice on how we can have him investigated for the Administrative abuses he has been guilty of since 2005. Icsunonove 05:08, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack, Sorry, I was busy, but that discussion that took place, I'm afraid, doesn't warrant any changes yet. I'm afraid the level of the discussion was poor, with most people not clear on the history. Such a change, as I suggest on the talk page, requires an RfC in History, Politics, and the India pages. Also you can't have British Indian Empire beginning in 1858. I think at this point, the best thing is to revert to the last stable version, and please consider replying to my suggestions on the talk page of British Raj. Fowler&fowler«Talk» 16:46, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The third opinion request for User talk:Stemonitis has been removed from WP:3o. Third opinion isn't really appropriate in this case since it seems you're basically trying to dispute the outcome of an admin's decision in closing an WP:RM discussion. Also, the discussion is still continuing with other editors on the article's talk page, which violates the 3o guideline of "two editors only." I'd suggest if you still want to bring other editor(s) into the discussion that you consider using WP:RFC/HIST or something like that. Otherwise, see if you reach another consensus with the continuing discussion at Talk:British Raj. --Darkwind (talk) 17:53, 28 August 2007 (UTC1)

Hello! I thought you may be interested in joining WikiProject Dravidian civilizations. We work on creating, expanding and making general changes to Dravidian related articles. If you would be interested in joining feel free to visit the Participants Page! Thank You.

Wiki Raja 22:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you could please put in your opinion at the talk page, as a certain user has returned. Icsunonove 00:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, I would very much like to merge/improve the articles, but there's been a change in my work situation and I haven't got as much time available for this sort of thing as I used to...:)

It will also be tricky as the two articles need a major reworking to put them into some kind of shape.

Bathrobe 06:29, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alex, for a long time I couldn't figure out what should be done to merge the articles on cheongsam and qipao without making major changes. I've finally figured it out. I don't think they need to be merged. I think it's fine to have separate articles. All that is needed is a change in naming.

At cheongsam, I've changed all occurrences of 'cheongsam' to changshan. That's the standard Chinese name for this male item of clothing. It was totally wrong to write the article using the Cantonese and English name 'cheongsam' which, as I pointed out ad nauseum, is different in meaning from the standard Chinese name changshan. With this change, and a few changes in the text, suddenly the article makes sense!

All that's needed now is for the article to be moved to Changshan. I realise that this is introducing yet another foreign word into English Wikipedia, but it seems the lesser evil than totally warping the meaning of 'cheongsam'.

I'm also thinking about moving qipao to the space left by 'cheongsam', but I'm not sure if this is necessary. The qipao article is highly annoying the way it switches between cheongsam and qipao from section to section, from sentence to sentence. I'm sure that Chinese speakers have a hand in this, but I also suspect that 'qipao' is also catching on in English as the new way of referring to the cheongsam.

Bathrobe (talk) 11:44, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AS;

I've already replied to it. I think it needs to be addressed as well. Charles 08:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you participated in related discussion, you might be interested in this.

Happy editing! --Qsaw ^(talk) 19:57, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yemen's Ministry of Planning and International Cooperation refers to the island as Jabal al-Tair Island. [19] It's also the most common use of the term across the internet. Of course, I'm just going on what I've been able to find, so I could be wrong. —Viriditas | Talk 05:05, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

When I created the Navbox music template, it had the groups across the top, so it looked very similar to what it did before I converted it. TigerK 69 has since been along and edited the Navbox music template so that the groups are now down the left. It may be best just to revert it back to before my edit if you would prefer it in the format it was in before. There's also a discussion about it all at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Musicians#Navboxes which you could comment on if you want saying that the groups look better across the top rather than down the side.

I've attempted to make a first draft of a new Halifax, Nova Scotia article, in my userspace here. It's in a very rough-and-ready form, and needs a lot of tidying, sorting, and being made consistent, as well as a proper opening, before it's ready. But it should give an idea as to what I believe that article should contain. Your thoughts would be appreciated! Thanks, --RFBailey 17:26, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the support at the move proposal for the Amritsar Massacre, however it appears one oppose, one 'I don't care' and several supports isn't consensus. Narson (talk) 01:39, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I may have replied testily; if so, I regret it. What would you consider evidence? Septentrionalis PMAnderson 05:35, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about removing the categories. I didn't know it is acceptable and it caused problems with automatic tagging of album articles with my bot. Seems that I have to find another workaround. Regards, Jogers (talk) 12:50, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, you didn't sound harsh at all. I use Jogersbot to add {{album}} tag to talk pages of articles about albums which haven't been tagged yet. I make a list of pages categorized as albums, convert them to talk namespace and automatically add the tags using Wikipedia:AutoWikiBrowser. The problem is that redirects generally shouldn't be tagged and the bot also automatically remove album tags from redirect's talk pages from time to time. Having redirects categorized as albums causes the bot to continuously add and remove the tag in the same page. Jogers (talk) 18:57, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you've come upon an issue that is in the middle of being addressed. Could you give your view at the talk page on what could be done to make the article more globally applicable. What my impression of the hurdles to this are:

1. Oil is traded world wide in dollars... no way around that one.
2. The absolute purchasing power (see also here) of various currencies makes a direct comparison of exchange rates difficult for non-economists (OK, it's not easy for economists either)

Any suggestions?

Also, is there something you would add to or change about this section (note that there is more discussion of the European situation at the head of the Effects section)? Thanks, NJGW (talk) 07:07, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking care of this for me. I'll be creating the page for the actress soonish. Alan (talk) 17:50, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please carefully read Wikipedia:Non-free content, and stop re-adding nonfree images in list articles such as discographies. There have been frequent conversations on this topic and consensus has held that such uses are not allowed. If you feel that policy or interpretation should change, you are welcome to join in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content, but please do not continue to edit disruptively to violate the current policy. Thanks. (ESkog)^(Talk) 18:17, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to say thanks for the support of the move. --Novelty (talk) 01:01, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unrelated to the above, but I've changed my conditional support to a support. --Novelty (talk) 04:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Considering your involvement at Talk:Levon V of Armenia#Requested move, can I get you to look at User:Srnec/Kings of Cilicia and tell me what you think of these proposed moves before I do them? It is designed to remove all inconsistency and ambiguity and favours English forms for non-Armenian names and whatever Armenian anglicisation is most popular in English texts for Armenian names. I am very open to changing "Thoros" to "Toros" or "Hetoum" to "Hethum" based on evidence of superior usage. Srnec (talk) 21:19, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Aj, I was a bit out of the loop last week and too slow to get there with the article split, but the result seems good. Thanks for letting me know and asking, anyway! Best wishes, Sedgefoot (talk) 22:09, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I specifically deleted my comments because I felt they were non-contributory to the discussion, in an attempt to calm things down. You had no business UNdeleting them. Do not re-instate my comments. Just drop it already. --Hammersoft (talk) 04:07, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I honestly have no idea about what needs to be done regarding flags, I just mass-protected them all because of the risk of vandalism. Could you please point your query to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Flag Template? east.718 at 02:51, February 22, 2008

Sorry, but I remain loathe to mess with things I have no knowledge about. I apologize for sending you around in circles, but as a last-ditch effort, could you run it by Andrwsc, who is active and is the most knowledgeable person regarding flags I'm aware of? Thanks. east.718 at 20:08, March 4, 2008

I have started a discussion at Mongolian tögrög about the proper name for the currency. The new criteria at the Numismatics project don't provide a clearcut answer. Numismatic catalogues, on Dove1950's own admission, use "tugrik" or "tughrik". But the Bank of Mongolia website uses "togrog". Google favours "Mongolian tugrik" over "Mongolian tögrög" by about 2,000:1, but Google results aren't among the criteria. I wonder if you have any insight on this?

(User:Latebird seems open to such a move if we can find recent data showing that "tugrik" is more common than "tögrög". His stance here is much less conservative (i.e. more receptive to new names) than it is at Ulaanbaatar, where even recent data on the growing popularity of Ulaanbaatar is not enough to convince him that Ulan Bator should be moved to Ulaanbaatar.)

Bathrobe (talk) 04:19, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AjaxSmack, I noticed your comment at Ulaanbaatar:

None of this is controversial but it doesn't really matter anyway. Nice was never a part of Italy but the Italian name is listed prominently. Ditto with Nancy, Listing a foreign language name does not denote a territorial claim or signify any type of chauvinism, it's just part of the knowledge that makes up an encyclopedia.

In fact, I have tried listing the Mongolian name of Irkutsk, Эрхүү, at that article but ran into opposition from an American-Russian editor. I eventually backed down and deleted the name from the head of the article (and was unable to find a place in the article where it could be mentioned naturally), but I still feel as you do about the possiblility of listing foreign names -- listing them doesn't signify a territorial claim or chauvinism, just part of the knowledge that makes up an encyclopedia. Since Irkutsk was originally founded in Mongolian-speaking territory and is named after a river (the Irkut or Эрхүү) that ran in such territory, I can't see the harm in adding the name. At any rate, I wondered what you might think about a case like this.

Bathrobe (talk) 06:01, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding that. I think it's definitely better having the Buryat name there. I was able to confirm that Эрхүү was the Buryat name of the river, but had no information on the name of the city.

Bathrobe (talk) 07:26, 28 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear AjaxSmack! In your last edit you erased Mongolian and Tibetan names explanation from article text. In your commentary you are declaring these names as foreign. It would be not any news for you that Tibetans are native population for the region and the same with Mongolians. So why you call them foreigners?. You know, I guess, that the most part of Tibetans and Mongolians live in China and Qinghai Lake region is one of the territories historically populated with these nations. In simple words, they are native. But I can note that Mongolian name with using Cyrillic (not traditional Mongol alphabet) is not correct - only this sentence (Cyrillic) is possible clame foreign. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 06:23, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good for moving Smpad to Sempad. Sounds/looks better that way. If you wish to move Hetoums, I'd prefer Hethum, but I won't be bothered if they stay where they're at or go to Het'um. It's a small matter of preference (though one user got mad at me over it once and we got into a brief edit war/arguing match). Srnec (talk) 06:54, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since you took part in the discussion about renaming this article, you may be interested in participating in a most evil poll to determine the public opinion on the naming issue. --Illythr (talk) 20:06, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Treaty of Jassy was written in three languages, Russian, Arabic (Turkish) and German since a copy was forwarded to Russia's ally, Austria. Catherine IInd also was much more conversant in German then Russian.--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 00:59, 6 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you say "It's also the Polish, Dutch, and Swedish name for Iaşi but that doesn't mean it's not English.", are you referring to the post-1944 sources to the operation in these languages? In any case, I'm not sure how that helps to discern what the English name should be.--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 02:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you don't think I am advocating this from sheer stubbornness, my position is that good article research should discriminate between good and bad original research, even when it is the source for the article. I don't think reference work editors should compromise on article quality in any way as a proof of our integrity expected by users--mrg3105 (comms) ♠♥♦♣ 01:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Milord (song), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://medlibrary.org/medwiki/Milord. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:48, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 March, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Boxer Rebellion Indemnity Scholarship Program, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Victuallers (talk) 18:11, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just reverted an esit that removed the old spelling, but could you add a source to the Ulaanbaatar article for the ROC still referring to the city as Kulun? I have changed it into perfect tense for now as this whole recognition stuff has become much less clear-cut since 2002(?), but a source (or something official that uses the name, a Chinese site should do) would be nice anyway. The more recent the better, of course. I would try this myself, but my chinese is very rudimentary. Yaan (talk) 18:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your notice. I support the move. There should be no hyphen or CamelCase according to the rules of pinyin. I have left my opinion at Wikipedia talk:History standards for China-related articles. --Neo-Jay (talk) 04:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While I support no hyphen and no camelcase, I don't understand the naming of empresses. I think I will observe before making a decision. Thank you for bringing this up =) Hanfresco (talk) 04:51, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You've made a right dog's breakfast of this page now, haven't you? I hope you're please with yourself. You know perfectly well that there was no concensus for this move and yet you ploughed on regardless, ensuring as you went that the move could not be easily reversed. By all means retain the split for now but please restore the agreed nomenclature.
Dove1950 (talk) 16:22, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:TsaiChin-HuiDaoWeilai-cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:20, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Bangalore has yet again been moved to "Bengaluru". That move was done hastily and in disregard of the long-running controversy about it and past lack of consensus for it. (It has also been made irreversible by ordinary editors.)
If your opinion is still that the article belongs at "Bangalore", please say so on the article's talkpage. -- Lonewolf BC (talk) 16:27, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The "duplicates" are necessary because not all the administrative divisions correspond to the natural atoll or the section of it. This is the case in certain atolls, like Faadhippolhu, which corresponds to the Administrative division "Lhaviyani".

However, North Malé Atoll and South Malé Atoll, together with Kaashidhoo Island and Gaafaru, form the administrative division known as Kaafu Atoll, which is not equal to the plain Male' Atoll.

The same can be said for Haa Alifu, Baa, Alifu Alifu, and other Administrative divisions of the Maldives which include smaller atolls and separate off-lying islands. Mohonu (talk) 08:52, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There's currently a dispute over which is the correct adjectival form of Moldova. It seems to me (as I've noted) that "Moldovan" is correct for the post-1991 republic, with "Moldavian" applying to the mediaeval principality of Moldavia and the Moldavian SSR. However, as you can see at Talk:Moldovan-Ukrainian relations, the dispute shows no signs of slowing down, so I suppose I'm requesting a comment from you there, particularly as this affects a range of articles. Thank you for your consideration. Biruitorul ^Talk 06:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Just so you know, I consider you rather an expert on naming conventions, plus you can't be accused of bias either way. I'm not sure why it's such an issue either, but, you know, things you'd never expect to be controversial have a way of appearing so here at times. Biruitorul ^Talk 15:01, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"We have established practice to use ß when it is commonly used in English, or there is no common usage in English." That is generally my sentiment too. Is that codified somewhere? — AjaxSmack 05:38, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

See WP:UE in general and the section "No established usage" for no common usage in English. --Philip Baird Shearer (talk)

But see the talk page also for an effort to state this, and the converse practice of using ss where it is common usage in English. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:37, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case you hadn't noticed, I moved your diacritics proposal to a separate page, WP:Usage of diacritics.--Kotniski (talk) 07:57, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You participated in a recent straw poll at Talk:The Great Hunger on a possible name change. This is a friendly notice that I have opened another straw poll, this time to find the names that editors are most opposed to. If you know of anybody who did not vote in the last straw poll, but who has an interest in the name debate, please feel free to pass this on. Scolaire (talk) 14:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AjaxSmack, I need some good advice from you. I’m new in English Wikipedia and hardly understand the rules and traditions of the Project. I really do not understand why user JPG-GR decided that the result of my proposal on the Livonian Order talk page should be called "no consensus". I bet he even didn’t read the discussion. 6 users (including myself) supported the move and only 3 opposed. There were even more opposers to move 3 Williams to Wilhelms, but these articles were moved. For a long time the page Livonian Order was a redirect to Livonian Brothers of the Sword, until in November 2007 Termer decided that this is a good name for an article about Teutonic Order in Livonia. I have shown that the name Livonian Order is ambiguous and even incorrect. I have shown that the correct name often appears in historical books on the subject. I have even shown that the same name is used in mediaeval documents up to the end of the Livonian branch in 1561. I just can’t believe that this all was for nothing. Maybe some of my phrases were grammatically incorrect or even funny, because I’m not native English speaker, but I don’t think that it is a good reason not to read my comments. I almost fall to pieces. AjaxSmack, do I have any way to appeal that decision? — Albert Krantz. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.81.133.163 (talk) 07:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 July, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Boris Kovač, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Bedford ^Pray 21:42, 21 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Failed. Maybe you can get an administrator to move them. I really don't feel like taking this to "other proposals", especially for something that should be unanimous. --Pwnage8 (talk) 15:33, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much for what you've done. Much appreciated. --Pwnage8 (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would voice my support, but I wish to avoid anything directly involving WikiProject Numismatics. The "discussions" related to numismatic articles call up visions of angels dancing on the head of a pin. I personally feel that time would be better spent on article content rather than form. And speaking of content, the article, whether called wen or cash, is inaccurate and misleading. I wish you luck in what you are trying to accomplish, but I suspect you are facing an unending struggle when it comes to WikiProject Numismatics.Sivasova (talk) 23:26, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I, too, don't care much about WikiProject Numismatics guidelines. I only became involved there because the previous version of guidelines directly conflicted with WP:CN and WP:UE. The root of my argument about Chinese cash rests on UE, CN, and WP:OR arguments which are supported by the newer numismatic guidelines. I encourage you to weigh in the debate no matter what your opinion and regardless of how you feel about the numismatic guidelines.

You say, "the article, whether called wen or cash, is inaccurate and misleading." Specifically what are you referring to? I have had some influence over the article content although the current version is User:Dove1950's iteration on the topic. Per your earlier comments on the talk page, the non-wén meanings of "cash" have been forked off into separate articles listed at Chinese cash. Though this may be overkill, there are many cash coins that were not cash (wén) denominated, some cash-denominated coins that were not struck copper cash, and then there's the weight measure called cash. This may be confusing but Wikipedia should reflect English usage which was and is to use "cash" for all three meanings. When this usage was established over a century ago, we didn't have Wikipedia talk pages to sort things out.

Also, I am interested to what unending struggle are you referring to vis-à-vis WikiProject Numismatics you are referring. — AjaxSmack 20:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really do not wish to be drawn into any discussion involving WikiProject Numismatics, but you deserve some indication of why I said "inaccurate and misleading" in regard to the cash/wen articles.

Entry: Chinese cash

• Cash (Chinese coin)

(1) The traditional Chinese cash coin (round with square hole) was brozne or brass. Yes, I know bronze/brass coins are copper coins, but there is even a distinction in Chinese between "green" and "yellow" cash. The non-traditional "cash" common after 1880 were copper coins and were sometimes called coppers or copper cash in English (to distinguish them from traditional cash). In Chinese, the former were referred to as 制錢 zhìqián, the latter as 洋錢 yángqián.

• Chinese cash (currency)

(2) Should read (currency unit). "Wen" is a currency unit (denomination), something abstract, a word or counter that appears on currency, which is physical.
(3) "Wen" was often used on paper money. It very, very rarely appeared on cash coins before the late 19th century, when it came into regular use on the new copper cash coins.

• Cash (mass)

(4) The "and a currency equivalent to that weight in silver" could be dropped. It is misleading. English "cash" was never used in connection with silver currency.

Article: Chinese wén, Section: History

(5) The first paragraph does not explain the usage of "wen" and misleadingly implies that many currency units were employed.
(6) Second paragraph: "...usually 1000." The "number of coins in a string" as money of account was always 1000. The number of coins on a (physical) string was virtually never 1000.
(7) Second paragraph: "...equal in value to...." The copper:silver exchange rate was first fixed at 1000 cash = 1 tael in 1376 under the Ming and lasted but briefly. The official rate was again fixed at 1000 cash = 1 tael silver under the Qing in 1647. This was an ideal rate used for keeping government financial accounts. The actual market rate was different (the only time that a cash coin actually weighed 1/10 ounce with the market rate at 1000 per silver tael was probably in 1684-1702).

I am not saying that all of this data should appear in the article but I do think that an accurate and coherent simplified article cannot easily be written by someone who ignores such matters/distinctions. The Chinese coins article is excellent but stops in the 11th century. Chinese currency provides a brief (and again, in my opinion, a misleading and inaccurate) continuation. There is no article that provides a summary of Chinese monetary history.Sivasova (talk) 15:18, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

These all sound like important points and are consistent with what I've read. You will notice that I had modified the current move request to read "Chinese cash (currency unit)" as you prefer and asked for suggestions if there are other preferred titles. Please add to the debate if you wish. Also, would you consider editing and/or adding the information you presented above to the respective articles? — AjaxSmack 15:04, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article has now been moved. That may be the easy part. As it is, however, the body of the article is entirely written from the point of view of calling the currency wén. I think it needs a bit of rewriting to harmonise the title and the body.

Bathrobe (talk) 01:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here is a previous incarnation from early this year written in "WP:UE POV": User talk:AjaxSmack/Sandbox/Chinese cash (currency). As far as the article as it stands now, the first picture should be axed since it doesn't deal specifically with the currency unit. (It's already at Cash (Chinese coin)). Some of the info in the history section was copied from Cash (Chinese coin) and is more relevant there since it deals with the type of coin and not the currency unit. I'll get to it when things cool down. I would like it if User:Sivasova would edit the article to address his/her concerns (listed above) as well. — AjaxSmack 01:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am not competent enough to write on this subject. I do not know anything about the use of wén as a denomination before the 20th century. Someone with a knowledge of Chinese needs to consult original Chinese sources and clarify the usage of wén.

Was wén really introduced as a currency unit in 621? Zhou inscriptions had indicated a coin's value, but the Tang inscribed their cash coins with Kai Yuan Tong Bao.

For about 13 centuries there was virtually only one coin in China, the traditional cash. The name of this coin was qian and, evidently, the denomination was one wén. In any event, English used the same word, cash, for both Chinese words.

Compare this to the situation in England, where the only coin for over five centuries was the silver penny (also known, for a time at least, as an esterlin or sterling). And no denomination was inscribed on it. The English, however, also used foreign coins, so the accounting system was more complex, and English-minted gold and other silver coins were in common use by the 14th century.

The first (non-ephemeral) non-cash (and non-copper) coin to circulate in China was the Spanish dollar from the Mexico City mint. It began circulating in Canton. When? The late 18th century? Certainly the Spanish dollar (yuan) was circulating south of the Yangtze by the time the first Chinese dollar/yuan was minted in 1837. The regular minting of Chinese silver coin only began in 1890.

Someone needs to explain how and when the different Chinese currency and accounting units were used during the Imperial period. And that is something I cannot do. — Sivasova (talk) 04:37, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your input would be appreciated at Talk:British Raj#What to do about British India. Xn4 (talk) 22:35, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to solicit feedback concerning moving this to Adam Jones (football). It makes sense to me, but is there consensus? Please opine in the section of the article talk page. Cheers, Dlohcierekim's sock (talk) 20:44, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well... if I don't place a hatnote in place, people won't find things, so

1. place hatnote
2. request a dab page at AFC
3. remove hatnote and replace with a dabpage link
4. request a move at WP:RM

There's no way around placing a very large hatnote in place, so it can't be a WP:POINT. And I thought WikiPedia isn't a bureaucracy? I only requested a move for an article I was pretty sure wasn't supposed to be primary anyway. (I have done steps 1-3 for other aticles, without the WP:RM, when I don't think it's necessary) 70.51.8.75 (talk) 08:06, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your earlier request. I have loaded the above mentioned image as requested. You might also notice that I have uploaded as many as possible images for the individual historic buildings on The Bund.Let me know if I can help further.Simonfieldhouse (talk) 21:49, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading Image:Familiarity with Didoes.gif. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:18, 20 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vou have opposed the move of "Carinthia (Province)" to "Koroška" on language grounds and wish to retain the English name "Carinthia".
The problem is that the Slovene European-Union region of Koroska is no longer identical with the part of old Carinthia that was ceded to Yugoslavia in 1919. If you look at the link provided^[1] you will see that the area of the new statistical region which the Slovene government now calls "Koroška" is about twice as large and includes a sizeable portion of Lower Styria that had never been Carinthian, an area which the Slovenes themselves still consider Styrian (Štajerska). Štajerska itself, i.e. the Slovene-speaking "Lower Styria" portion of the Habsburg Duchy of Styria exists now now merely as an idea, because it has been split into statistical regions in which that ancient name does not appear any longer, whereas for completely obscure reasons the Slovenian government wishes to keep the name "Koroška" alive.
I am of the opinion that the local name of a foreign part for which there has never existed an English name could very well be accepted into English terminology. English usage has accepted new local names even for places and areas that used to have an English name. Where has "Rhodesia" gone or "Bohemia and Moravia"? What about Formosa and Ceylon? Don't you call these islands Taiwan and Sri Lanka now? I've even been told off for using on WP the century-old English spelling of "Hapsburg"! Marschner (talk) 15:11, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Jimmy Buffett concert tours, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Jimmy Buffett concert tours has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Jimmy Buffett concert tours, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:51, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I saw that you had changed the Bridge Creek (John Day River) title to Bridge Creek (Oregon). The problem with this is that Oregon has many streams named Bridge Creek. Please see the GNIS list here. Adding the parent-stream name is a standard way to differentiate multiple streams with the same name in the same state. If you agree with this logic, could you please revert your change? Finetooth (talk) 01:07, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Your logic makes as much sense as mine. Thanks for responding. Finetooth (talk) 17:53, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Tony Tarracino at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —Politizer ^talk/_contribs 15:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tony Tarracino, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:The Balham Alligators albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 15:51, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack. I saw your question to PMAnderson at his talkpage. Please see my answer there, and also the remarks I'm about to post at WT:MOS.

–_⊥^{¡ɐɔıʇǝo}Noetica!^T– 00:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"This is an encyclopedia for the general reader, not a work of taxonomy". I'm glad we agree. --Born2cycle (talk) 03:17, 19 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to drop a note regarding your moving of categories to redirects, as you did with Interstate 840 (Tennessee). I've removed those Interstate categories, as 840 in particular is not part of the Interstate highway system...it was built entirely by the state of Tennessee to avoid the stricter Federal regulations regarding construction of such roads. Those categories really should have never been added to the main article in the first place! Seeing that you've recently performed a number of such category moves, you may want to go back and check out those other articles to see if any others should have such categories purged. Cheers! — Huntster (t • @ • c) 10:50, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry you had to hear the same thing three times on that talk page. That wasn't my intention when I wrote the first reply to your comment. Dekimasuよ! 03:49, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• I intended to say something slightly different than Dekimasu at Talk:Marko Đoković; in any case, you have not replied. I have seen your note on Noerten/Northeim, and I trust that will converge. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 16:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Converge to consensus, as it seems to be doing.
  • I do not believe, any more than you, that dropping diacritics by itself makes something English; but there is significant evidence (all the sources to the article, for example) that Marko Djokovic is what English writers use, and Marko Đoković isn't. (If you see this repeated there, consider it laziness, and respond where most convenient.) Septentrionalis PMAnderson 17:45, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:JimmyBuffettTicketStub1995.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I left you a reply at Talk:A World to Believe In. ^~Moon~月と日の出 ^~Sunrise~ 18:37, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You added that there is a line backtracked into the song in March 2008. I've never heard of this and am surprised it has not been questioned. I couldn't find it on Youtube and Google did not show any good results for the line. Daniel Christensen (talk) 07:32, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reply here. — AjaxSmack 20:26, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The specific filter that was triggered by your edit has been disabled, not the entire abuse filter. Anyhow, are the restrictions still in place? --Conti|✉ 01:23, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just found the tool to give users back the autoconfirmed status. Seems you still (or again) have yours, tho, so everything should be in order now. --Conti|✉ 01:26, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A second unilateral move has been made here, this time to Inflation (financial). I'd like to request intervention to restore the status quo ante until the issue can be properly discussed. It is highly inappropriate for issues to be decided by unilateral action. JQ (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I continue to prefer Alawi or Alawite as what English actually uses; sorry to have missed it. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 18:01, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deserved promotion. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:11, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to participate in a discussion at Talk:George Town, Penang#Georgetown vs George Town revisited. -- Tcncv (talk) 01:51, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PenangSign2.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PenangSign1.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 07:06, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work sourcing the Bria Valente article. I've been meaning to get to it but haven't had the time. Good to see WP isn't completely overrun by deletionists these days, although it seems that way at times. dissolve^talk 22:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! I just withdrew my opposition at Talk:Berne#Requested move after checking the numerous UK sources that use "Bern". Since you opposed per my reasoning, I thought it migth be a good idea to let you know :) Jafeluv (talk) 12:28, 6 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ajax, since that move was closed (and the move made), the decision has been questioned, and your opposition has been mentioned. If you could review the relevant discussions at Talk:Bern and User talk:Aervanath and throw in your current input, that would be helpful. Thanks. --Born2cycle (talk) 21:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, since you participitated Talk:Assyrian_people#Requested_move, I was wondering if you could do the same for the rest of related pages at Talk:Assyrian/Syriac_diaspora#Request_Move. Iraqi (talk) 00:03, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Gulf and western (music genre), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gulf and western (music genre). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 17:06, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I am still skeptical of the article names for the various Chinese empresses - such as Empress Dowager Xiaozhuang. They do not conform to WP:COMMONNAME Do you still have an interest in changing them? Colipon+(T) 20:50, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Live by the Bay - screenshot.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 06:00, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On August 12, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Taipei Bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

WP:DYK 08:14, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Since you weighed in at both discussions for Adaptation and Good Night, and Good Luck, I ask you to share your thoughts at the discussion to address such situations in the naming conventions for films guidelines. The discussion can be found here. —Erik (talk • contrib) 20:22, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TsaiChin-HuiDaoWeilai-cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 05:46, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, AjaxSmack! I see you have been involved in the previous discussion about renaming the article Carinthia (province). I've opened a new discussion about the renaming of the article to 'Slovenian Carinthia' (see its talk page) and moving the material about the statistical region to a separate article (like it has been done for other Slovenian statistical regions; see {{Statistical regions of Slovenia}}). --Eleassar ^{my talk} 06:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Would you be so kind and have a look at Chameria? Is merging OK Guildenrich (talk) 00:39, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:JIMMY BUFFETT -- Pencil Thin Moustache.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:01, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:TsaiChin-HuiDaoWeilai-cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:31, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:TsaiChin-HuiDaoWeilai-cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC) Aspects (talk) 23:42, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:The Balham Alligators albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for giving your comments at Talk:Daśāvatāra#Requested_move. As per the consensus: The result of the proposal was move to nondiacritic for the article. Several alternatives have been presented for this particular article (Dashavatara, Dasavatara, Dashavatar) so please help pick an appropriate one. Thanks. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 13:50, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom/Article title. DrKiernan (talk) 09:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack, thanks for all your contributions to the coverage of China-related topics. I just wanted to let you know that templates like {{zh-cpcy}} are deprecated; instead of using these templates you can use {{zh}}, which has replaced all of them, from now on. rʨanaɢ (talk) 21:38, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:EDDIE MONEY -- I Wanna Go Back.ogg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Dawnseeker2000 01:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Kibinda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is a disambiguation page where there are no articles to disambiguate.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Whpq (talk) 20:04, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ajax, "Fausto Veranzio" aside, I'm getting a headache just thinking about the amount of hellfire I'll be dealing with if this guy gets incentive. We're talking about a textbook Italian nationalist account trying to "italianize" Dalmatian/Croatian/Montenegrin articles. There are now maybe a dozen blocked accounts (off the top of my head [20][21][22][23] etc...) of the exact same type and each one caused an enormous mess before the community got the idea. This is standard-issue irredentist ultra-right-wing nonsense that's kept quiet for the last 18 months or so. Supporting this in any way is a mistake, a BIG one... --DIREKTOR ^(TALK) 20:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you pride sir of your behaviour? Using arguments ad personam, throwing discredit on a respectable user on another users talkpage just because you want to make your position prevail. How can you imagine AjaxSmack or other user can believe you anymore? --Theirrulez (talk) 20:36, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made a proposal before the move request, which I think represents a decent compromise on the main issues.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 17:54, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You posted messages on both talk pages, saying discuss it on the other! Make yr mind up please. Johnbod (talk) 03:03, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have requested a move of Punjab (Pakistan) to Punjab (Pakistani province). You may wish to express your opinion on the talk page.

You recently participated in a move request of Fausto Veranzio. Since a new move was requested, please discuss it at Talk:Faust_Vrančić#Requested_move_redux if you care. - Theirrulez (talk) 03:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 02:31, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Just thought you would like to know that I have reposted the request for moving Cote d'Ivoire to Ivory Coast, as I thought it was time for this to be discussed again, and that the last request was inappropriately closed with a "No Consensus"-decision. I also reposted your old argument for the move.TheFreeloader (talk) 03:10, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vote for consensus. There's a vote for consensus at Talk:Involvement of the People's Republic of China in Africa#Rename. I'm re-proposing a name: Economic relations between the People's Republic of China and Africa. I saw you preferred 'Economic relations between China and Africa'; there doesn't appear to be consensus for that version. Could you support this one? Ocaasi (talk) 04:39, 17 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, just thought I'd stop by to let you know I've responded to your comment on the Rossmuck talk page. aineolach (u · d · c) 21:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AjaxSmack,

I noticed these two edits of yours, [24], [25]. Just letting you know, that when you have a query or a comment, it is a rule of thumb to put a *'''Comment''' and then your statement, just like you would if you were supporting or opposing the proposal. For example:

• Support per nom.
• Oppose per WP:BIO
• Comment isn't the use of a comma with placenames an Americanism?

I hope you understand I truly appreciate your efforts at requested moves, and I just thought I'd let you know of this. Thanks, warrior4321 00:09, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Departments of Côte d'Ivoire - request withdrawn. Since you seem to have interest in organizing things, maybe you can have a look at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(geographic_names)#Country_subdivisions - would you support table inclusion? It would give the people an overview about how to name country subdivision articles. Currently there is no central overview. Schwyz (talk) 20:25, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:King County (disambiguation) - I added a 4th one, namely King County, Queensland. TakakaCounty (talk) 10:05, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, AjaxSmack. Could I please ask you to take a second look at the discussion at Talk:Coţofeni culture? Not sure if it will sway your opinion, but hey, it might. - Biruitorul ^Talk 13:56, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AjaxSmack. Could I ask you to take a look at the discussion at Talk:White Rabbit? 75.142.152.104 (talk) 03:39, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Road Types.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 16:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 16:46, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You commented on the Homs/Hims discussion, so I am notifying you of the current Category discussion at: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 September 6#Category:Hims. --Bejnar (talk) 17:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you participated in a discussion last spring that resulted in renaming The Bronx as Bronx. There is now a proposal to open a new Request for Comments on restoring the original name. If you have comments about the timing of such a proposal, please make them soon at Talk:Bronx#Query: when do we consider this? because, unless a there's a consensus against such a Request for Comments, it will begin early this week. Thanks. —— Shakescene (talk) 21:48, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

C U N T C U N T C U N T C U N T C U N T

F A G G O T

W A N K E R

K I K E —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.171.231.18 (talk) 00:52, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I was wondering why you contested to my requests at RM, since you didn't leave one in the edit summary. I'd like to point you to WP:TITLE which says that shorter titles are preferred, and "only as precise as is necessary to identify the topic of the article unambiguously." Since there are no other places with those names, the titles I proposed are appropriate. ~DC ^{We Can Work It Out} 03:58, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WuChun-lin - LovingOthersIsAHappyThingCDCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:03, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. I believe you've made a mistake in the last word in your reply at Talk:Legendary. You probably meant to use "legendary" there. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 04:16, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have proposed moving the African-American Civil Rights Movement pages. You can join in the discussion at: Talk:African-American_Civil_Rights_Movement_(1955–1968)#Proposed_Move Thanks, Racepacket (talk) 23:28, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on a list of issue and a stragtegy for the names of places in kosovo , User_talk:Mdupont#Naming_and_status_of_Kosovo_pages I would like to invite you to take part and comment, have seen your activity of kosovo articles in the past. Thanks, mike James Michael DuPont (talk) 12:11, 15 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, do you mind if I move your hook to go live on 26/27th? The GLAM WIKI conference could do with being highlighed by a non US/UK hook? Victuallers (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 26 November 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jadeite Cabbage, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Jadeite Cabbage (pictured), a piece of jadeite carved into the shape of a Chinese cabbage with a locust and katydid camouflaged in the leaves, is the "most famous masterpiece" in Taiwan's National Palace Museum? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:02, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - I agree that if Walesa should be moved, then Milosevic would be a good candidate for renaming as well. I'm not trying to single out Walesa - his was just the first article where I noticed this issue. This is also not a crusade against diacritics or "foreign-sounding things". There are many articles where I think WP:DIACRITICS means the diacritics should remain. You mentioned the hundreds of Polish politician articles. I would imagine that the vast majority of those pages would keep the diacritics, because they're either written that way in English-language sources, or there isn't sufficient info to determine a common English-language version.

And I understand your concern with the piecemeal approach and the inconsistency it breeds as articles are changed one by one. My concern with the mass renaming proposal is that while there are many clear candidates for renaming, there are bound to be many borderline cases, and I'm afraid of getting bogged down in a massive Wikipedia debate fest that accomplishes nothing tangible, which is why I'm trying an incremental approach. If you have any suggestions for an alternative approach, I'd love to hear your thoughts. Dohn joe (talk) 23:39, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Interesting how these diacritical move requests are proceeding, no? Anyhow, I was just trying to get a better feel for some people's positions, and so I thought I'd ask you this: I was browsing the requested move page, and saw that you wrote in the Talk:Tarahumara#Move.3F discussion that English usage is more important than Spanish or local usage. I was wondering how that squared with your opposition to "Lech Walesa" for example. I'm genuinely interested - not trying to posture or change your mind. Just trying to see where people are coming from. Thanks. Dohn joe (talk) 18:18, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am a strong proponent of a strict interpretation of WP:UE. In numerous cases including primarily geographical names (e.g., my favorite, Côte d'Ivoire and others such as the current RM at Talk:Marseille) but others too (e.g., cheongsam, not qipao; Chinese cash (currency), not Chinese wen). I even have proposed moving people to non-diacritic names if the subjects themselves didn't use them (e.g., Ahmet Ertegun). However, as I noted before, I oppose removing diacritics from names of people notable in areas where such diacritics are used. While many newspaper style manuals prohibit most or all diacritics, Wikipedia does not. More importantly, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a newspaper, and its usage should reflect that of similar higher calibre sources, e.g. other encyclopedias or books on the subject. Finally, unlike obscuring quality of the pedantic usage of truly different foreign-language terms, diacritics, in my estimation, have zero negative effect on a reader's ability to comprehend the subject. — AjaxSmack 04:26, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think Côte d'Ivoire is everyone's favorite. As for Walesa, isn't he notable outside of Poland? To me, the situation is analogous to placenames. If there's no general English-language usage of a placename, then using the local name is fine; likewise, if there's no general English-language usage of a person's name, then Wikipedia should probably use the local version. But Walesa has an established English version of his name - and it appears in reputable encyclopedias and books. And what about the argument that Walesa himself seems to use "Walesa" when presenting himself in English? Anyhow, I think it's an interesting issue - thanks for your thoughts. Dohn joe (talk) 19:27, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in my comment at Talk:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955–1968)#Requested_move I've informally suggested Civil Rights Movement (United States, 1955–1968) (etc.) as an alternative. What do you think of that? (replying there, if you choose to reply, would be preferable to me - thanks). --Born2cycle (talk) 18:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot, I'll try to be more clear..[[26]] By --Shardan (talk) 16:19, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Xiaochi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Thelmadatter (talk) 01:28, 18 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 December 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Xiaochi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that xiaochi, or Chinese and Taiwanese "small eats", can include such ingredients as stinky tofu, sheep head, grass jelly or pork intestines? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 18:03, 18 December 2010 (UTC) [reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:West Friesland (historical region).png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:38, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• White Rabbit (disambiguation) → White rabbit —AjaxSmack? Macr86 (talk) 02:51, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  AjaxSmack, AjaxSmack, my name is Macr86. Macr86 (talk) 02:54, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  AjaxSmack, I can't move White Rabbit (disambiguation) to White rabbit. Now, I need your help to get move back to the article White rabbit. Macr86 (talk) 02:56, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

For Chopin's Polish songs, you kindly added the ref "Oxford Music", Kornel Michałowski and Jim Samson. Chopin, Fryderyk Franciszek as equivalent to Jim Samson. Now I found a similar entry for Alfred Dürr, A Dürr, now an External link. I could imagine that it is also equivalent to a New Grove entry. How could I ref that? (I will watch here.) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:37, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The cite is:

• Hans Heinrich Eggebrecht and Konrad Küster. "Dürr, Alfred". Grove Music Online. Oxford Music Online. Retrieved 8 January 2011.

— AjaxSmack 21:25, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Dürr in prep, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 21:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article General average/New version is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/General average/New version until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Whpq (talk) 17:26, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for adding the pages to Republic of China – South Africa relations. I meant to do it but forgot. Thanks again!--TM 13:41, 16 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry that I didn't reply; I was out of town and without Internet access for several days. Thanks for the note and for the work! Nyttend (talk) 02:40, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 18 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Duke Ellington at Fargo, 1940 Live, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Duke Ellington's 1940 live recording At Fargo was an amateur bootleg not officially released until 1978? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:03, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At Talk:Washington (U.S. state)#Requested move you wrote: This seems to be a textbook case of no primary topic (as explained at WP:PRIMARYTOPIC). - I guess that would be textbook case number 2: Talk:Chihuahua#Requested move - Chihuahua (state)? What can be done, is there any proof of primary topic required, or is it pure voting? TopoChecker (talk) 00:15, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you may be interested in AfD. SEE: County Road 4011 (Volusia County, Florida), Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/County Road 4011 (Volusia County, Florida). Gamweb (talk) 17:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I was doing some minor editing on this, and noticed that the date of death in the intro and infobox don't match. Could you take a look at this and see which is correct? AlexiusHoratius 17:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The incorrect date may have derived from a New York Times obit of Towers that originally listed the date as 28 Dec but has since been corrected. — AjaxSmack 22:41, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shirlington Circle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable traffic circle, does not pass the WP:GNG.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Admrboltz (talk) 04:11, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jack Towers, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a 1940 live recording of Duke Ellington by "audio magician" Jack Towers won a Grammy Award in 1980? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

—HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 00:07, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Uttering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

To state that "uttering" is a crime is false and unverifiable. The transitive verb of the word "utter" is "uttering". It is not a crime to be caught "uttering". This article should be deleted.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Securel (talk) 19:14, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Uttering is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uttering until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Securel (talk) 21:13, 24 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing!HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:33, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding these names until a full discussion has taken place in Wikiproject Ireland.

Snappy (talk) 22:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What does a king do? ANy information? Thank you.

--JabocJacobOhYeah (talk) 22:40, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't assuming anything...it was a simple mistake. It happens. thanks for the catch--User:Woohookitty ^{Disamming fool!} 02:59, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christian Zeal and Activity, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that John Adams' "Christian Zeal and Activity" from American Standard is an arrangement of "Onward, Christian Soldiers", a popular hymn tune by Arthur Sullivan? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:04, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

On 8 April 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article American Standard (John Adams), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that John Adams' "Christian Zeal and Activity" from American Standard is an arrangement of "Onward, Christian Soldiers", a popular hymn tune by Arthur Sullivan? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 00:05, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uttering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uttering until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Securel (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please vote on the proposed name from regarding the Changbai Mountain Ranges. Thanks. --DandanxD (talk) 05:48, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Get over it, we have POLICIES (god damn it) that enforce the standard that China is NOT the state. --HXL's Roundtable and Record 05:04, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 May 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Crimean Socialist Soviet Republic, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... the government of the Crimean Socialist Soviet Republic was headed by Dmitry Ilyich Ulyanov, Vladimir Lenin's brother? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

The DYK project (nominate) 06:02, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

I closed that move request as no consensus. Feel free to do the merges you suggested if those are right since there were no objections.

Also you may want to consider auto archiving your talk page to manage the length. Vegaswikian (talk) 20:09, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• See Talk:BRICS#Continued discussion. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 14:01, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I hope I'm not stepping out of line here, but I moved your comment from the contested requests section to Talk:Candy bar where there's now a proper move request. If this is not okay, feel free to delete your comment. Have a good day! Rennell435 (talk) 19:44, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Don't force me to clean up after you like this again. You should know better than that. —Xiaoyu: 聊天 (T) 和 贡献 (C) 23:09, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

I just looked up that Vandalia ref and noticed that the Google book search gives it as on page 41. If I am right I wanted to mention it as I can see it might get you into more upset if the other person spots it. Chaosdruid (talk) 13:52, 31 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Article Rescue Barnstar
		For your efforts in rescuing hastily-nominated articles for deletion, which are often actually quite notable. Northamerica1000 (talk) 03:49, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Perpetual Diet of Regensburg at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! — Toдor Boжinov — 08:07, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What about "Ordos (city)" or, even better, "Ordos (prefecture level city)"? The comment by the only other commentor on the talk page so faruser:Tapered gives (IMHO) yet another example of how misleading the current title is. Regards, Yaan (talk) 11:31, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 24 September 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Perpetual Diet of Regensburg, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Eternal Diet, "a bladeless knife without a handle", followed the Youngest Recess of the Holy Roman Empire? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Perpetual Diet of Regensburg.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Orlady (talk) 08:48, 24 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Hyphen Page Screenshot.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:12, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Unicode Hyphen Redirect Page Screenshot.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:13, 16 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering, do you think of the ROC then and now as separate distinct political states or are they the same continuous states? Liu Tao (talk) 14:10, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 19:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello AjaxSmack! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:52, 25 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Hello. I put back your leed paragraph for Matt Fong. You were right and User:HkCaGu was wrong. I have been having the same problem with him at Talk:Michael_Woo#Chinese_and_middle_names, and the next two sections after that one. Also the source he used for Matt Fong's full name is not Reliable. I hope you can take a look at what has been going on at Mike Woo and keep your eye on it. Thank you so much. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 07:15, 2 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The move cropped up on my watchlist and I found the reason, specifically "precision - article is about a type of castle, not only mottes and baileys", is a bit puzzling. Could you elaborate on that? Nev1 (talk) 19:15, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I made a request to move Naja atra to Chinese cobra per WP:COMMONNAME. This species is known by the vernacular name "Chinese cobra" worldwide, not just in English, but in almost any language you can think of. I would really appreciate your support at Wikipedia:Requested moves and it is listed under date January 9, 2012. Thanks. Bastian (talk ★ contribs) 20:30, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You seemed to be the only one making sense in that discussion, and your pointed questions stood unanswered, so I also initially opposed. However, I've since changed my mind. You might too. Check it out if you haven't already. --Born2cycle (talk) 18:49, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Central Provident Fund (South Africa) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Central Provident Fund (South Africa) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

As a participant to previous discussions at the South Tibet/ Arunachal Pradesh / Arunachal Pradesh dispute / South Tibet dispute talk page, you might be interested to participate to the following poll. Thanks, --Pseudois (talk) 04:34, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sammy Hagar - (Sittin' on) The Dock of the Bay single front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:32, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The second infobox is pretty distracting and I am for it to remove it from the article. Or you convince me it is a notable cover. Regards.♫GoP♫_T^C_N 12:24, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - You recently participated in a move proposal discussion regarding articles about zombies and zombie pop culture archived at Talk:Zombie. That proposal was not approved, and a new discussion is taking place at Talk:Zombie (fictional) that is narrower in scope, and concerns only whether the older Voodoo and newer Romero zombie pop culture should be included in the same article or whether it should be separated. These are articles that receive a lot of hits, and should probably get more input than just the two editors having the current discussion. I'm flagging all old move discussion participants regarding the new discussion, and your input would be appreciated. LaTeeDa (talk) 21:45, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to diacritics guideline discussion at WT:BLP

Hi, you were one of 100+ Users who has commented on a living person Requested Move featuring diacritics (e.g. the é in Beyoncé) in the last 30 days. Following closure of Talk:Stephane Huet RM, a tightening of BLP guidelines is proposed. Your contribution is invited to WT:BLP to discuss drafting a proposal for tightening BLP accuracy guidelines for names. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:04, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to duplicate this invite on the pages of others who have commented, for or against. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:10, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I do appreciate your help to get this to actually 'stick' this time, in some MOS somewhere. Thanks. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:22, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, please do not put line breaks between HTML list items, as they generate very ugly HTML which causes problems for screen reader users. See the accessibility guideline on the topic. Graham87 15:52, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Gulf and western (music genre). Since you had some involvement with the Gulf and western (music genre) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 20:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi you might wish to note this, restored after deleted 7 days. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 June 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article 3-6-3 Rule, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the third digit in the banking industry's "3-6-3 Rule" refers to bankers being able to "tee off at the golf course by 3 p.m."? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/3-6-3 Rule. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:04, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion on moving the article Côte d'Ivoire to Ivory Coast. You are being notified since you participated in a previous discussion on this topic. Please join the discussion here if you are interested. TDL (talk) 02:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AjaxSmack, and hearty apologies for my error in the discussion earlier, now rectified! Zarcadia (talk) 21:18, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Terribly sorry, but if you would please add the word "support" bracketed by six apostrophes if your comment on the move from Urban free-ranging dog to Street dog was meant to support the move. I think a reader of your words would understand it to be intended as your support for the move, but it's not %100 clear with typing Support at the beginning. Chrisrus (talk) 03:01, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for speaking up in the BLP RMs; re Oilgate, what are you proposing moving the South African scandal to? In ictu oculi (talk) 06:24, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you missed one of the three Vietnamese RMs Bánh bò. :) btw have you noticed that there's been an upsurge in the selective use of full Vietnamese spelling - not necessarily of people/towns but of other Vietnamese words and phrases - both in English sources and print media. Since Thanh Nien Weekly was renamed Vietweek the web and print edition are using full spelling for native words.

Aside from that, can I ask if you yourself know any Vietnamese / have any interest in editing Vietnam articles? I'm just curious. In ictu oculi (talk) 22:41, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia_talk:Naming_conventions_(Vietnamese)#RfC_on_spelling]]. KarlB (talk) 00:07, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jacobiasca formosana, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the insect Jacobiasca formosana helps create the unique flavor of dongfang meiren tea by sucking the juices from the tea plant's stems and leaves? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jacobiasca formosana. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:04, 30 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AjaxSmack. Please see Talk:Bat lau dung laai#Alternative move to Cantonese transcription. You should probably discuss this move with Deryck Chan if you think this was a bad idea on his part. If you disagree, the best plan is to ask Deryck what options for appealing his decision he can suggest. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 02:34, 17 August 2012 (UTC) [reply]

You probably should note that among Kauffner's other actions/moves/redirects since the stall of the Sockpuppet investigation was to add Halligen to User:Kauffner/RM incubator, in all set of actions that is a fairly clear indicator that he believes he has got away with the IP puppeting on all the RMs, and intends to resume business as normal. I will add Halligen to my watchlist though I doubt he'll use an IP to hide a previous RM again.
On a more positive note, it seems that there's a reasonably firm consensus to restore the damage done to WP:VN articles. Zaldax has suggested that it's time to start editing Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Vietnamese) to remove the anti-Vietnamese titles/text content. Will you be part of rewriting this? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:16, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that an ongoing poll is taking place to move Burma to Myanmar. I know this happened just recently but no administrator would close these frequent rm's down, so here we go again. This note is going out to wikipedia members who have participated in Burma/Myanmar name changing polls in the past. It does not include banned members nor those with only ip addresses. Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:06, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Chu Ke-liang at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Secretlondon (talk) 00:15, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chu Ke-liang, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Taiwanese comedian Chu Ke-liang went into hiding for ten years to escape gambling debts to underworld figures? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Chu Ke-liang. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Yngvadottir (talk) 00:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ni hao. How do you do that clever stuff whereby you get Amazon page view chunks to show in RMs. Is it possible to do so with a CD cover like this or would that be copyright even for illustrative use? ..and btw, speaking of whom, just have a look at Jimbo (temporarily) on Talk:Đặng Hữu Phúc! In ictu oculi (talk) 05:30, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p10.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 18:40, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also the following images:

• File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p14.jpg
• File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p212.jpg
• File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p229.jpg
• File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p339.jpg

—Bkell (talk) 18:48, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p10.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p14.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:13, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p212.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:14, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p229.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:14, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Into The Vietnamese Kitchen p339.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:14, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome back. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:35, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack, I'm trying to assess consensus at the Crimean Karaites RM. Consensus appears to be leaning towards a move. I noticed your opposition was based on the originally proposed destination, and I was wondering if you feel the same way about the RM as it now stands. --BDD (talk) 19:01, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that two RMs you took part in in 2010 were moved counter result/your vote in Feb 2012 and locked. Don't recognise other editors as still being active. Do you want to be informed of specifics or at this point is ignorance bliss? Otherwise hope you are well. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:55, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, in that case then they are Talk:Chữ Nôm and Talk:Hán tự, but actually 2007, and I personally don't have any energy for yet another RM for a RM result to be restored. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:15, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'd forgotten about above till recent undiscussed moves. This reminds me that you have longer history than myself in participating in RMs on this subject. In recent db-G6 counter RM results the new redirect WP:VIETCON is being cited. Do you recall that "guideline" ever actually being adopted as a guideline or passing any consensus before have a guideline box added to it? I cannot see anything in the history to suggest so, even though it is moot anyway following the 23 majority on that recent RfC. Can you recall? In ictu oculi (talk) 04:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Virginia State Route 114, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fairlawn, Virginia and Virginia State Route 23 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just curious about the rationale for deleting File:Vijayanagara flag.png. (I've never seen the file but it was linked from a Wikipedia article I edited.) The discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vijayanagara flag.png is quite cryptic with only three words of total argument on either side. Reply at en:User talk:AjaxSmack if you could. Thanks. AjaxSmack (talk) 02:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I looks like it was an error. Since it is in use in several places, the reason given for deletion, "unencyclopedic", was not valid. I have restored it. . . Jim - Jameslwoodward (talk to me • contribs) 10:59, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since you were involved in the move discussion for Yield sign, please checkout the straw poll over at Talk:Yield sign#Proposal to close discussion and share your thoughts. Thanks Tiggerjay (talk) 21:55, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. Same old towns at Talk:Cần Thơ being undiscussed-moved and db-G6-moved yet again. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:09, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nộm. If you're wondering why I supported Haiphong in the above new RM, it seems clear it is an exonym. In ictu oculi (talk) 04:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 18:51, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Délvidék, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baranya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Great Dajak, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Great Dayak. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. MadmanBot (talk) 02:40, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Bensci54. AjaxSmack, thanks for creating Republic of Indonesia (1949–1950)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This seems like a valuable article; however, it lacks sources. Some additional information about its origins and relations to West Java would be nice as well.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 04:26, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Groote Oost, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Celebes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As a participant of the discussion Talk:Palestine#Requested_move regarding naming change of the page Palestine, you might be interested in discussion Template talk:Asia topic#State of Palestine on changing the redirection target of "Palestine" from "Palestinian territories" to "State of Palestine" at Template:Asia topic. Thank you.Greyshark09 (talk) 23:08, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, had a happy new year period I hope? You remember the Talk:Hán tự RM above? I've been improving the article, and the subject of the article is chữ nho, "Confucian script" (as per the majority of English sources, even Lonely Planet), but in Vietnamese texts chữ Hán "Chinese script is more common and chữ Nho is often capitalized, perhaps to distinguish from wikt:nho grape, though technically it shouldn't be. I also note that vi:chữ Hán covers more in vi.wp, including Japanese, which we obviously don't count relevant in the en.wp article. In such a case what do you think the better title is? chữ Hán, chữ nho or chữ Nho? Incidentally, and more importantly, any copy edits you might wish to make would be most welcome. I've expanded quite a bit and added sources and new image, but could do with a polish. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:05, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indus River, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tibetan language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited State of East Indonesia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Celebes and Gorontalo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 16 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, you recently !voted on a move proposal. Discussion ended, and it was closed 3 days ago. A second discussion has now been opened, to discuss whether to undo the close here.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kent, Washington, D.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MacArthur Boulevard (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Barnstar of Diligence
	Way to go with State of East Indonesia, it's good to have some more editors working on articles related to the area. This coconut isn't from Bali, but enjoy it anyways.  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:13, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 March 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article State of East Indonesia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the State of East Indonesia was nicknamed the "state which goes along with the master"? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/State of East Indonesia. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:02, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The move discussion was closed without alerting editors at the relevant Wikiprojects to join in. It has long been the consensus at WP:THEATRE and WP:MUSICALS to spell the word "theatre", in part because theatre professionals prefer this spelling throughout the English-speaking world, and because this spelling it is not wrong anywhere, while "theater" is wrong in many places,such as the UK. BTW, I am an American from New York City. Note that nearly all of the Broadway theatres are called "X Theatre". I have re-opened the discussion on the talk page to see if we can get a wider consensus on this issue. Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:52, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Duke 1940 cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fargo 1940 cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Duke Ellington at Fargo 1940 Special 60th Anniversary Edition cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Complete Legendary Fargo Concert cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 05:40, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is needed at Joshua tree talk page. -- Robinlarson (talk) 20:23, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Daikon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taiwanese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 20:54, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:"War and Peace" added refs. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:53, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you add some mindless response to a name-chage request I authored? You clearly know nothing about the topic, nor did you read the entries you referred my request to (I wrote the entries you referred me to, genius). Let others who KNOW what they are doing reply. You clearly do not read before judging others you don't know enough about to comprehend.Motthoop (talk) 16:33, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sammy Hagar - (Sittin' on) The Dock of the Bay single back cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:57, 20 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:Rick Springfield - I've Done Everything For You single cover.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:16, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

• File:YangHucheng.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:43, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya. you're already familiar with this article, latest, see top, is an infobox counter merge consensus. Or award a barnstar for persistence perhaps? Anyway. In ictu oculi (talk) 09:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nakhichevan Eyalet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nakhichevan Eyalet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. eh bien mon prince (talk) 15:35, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, this is to let everyone who commented in the last RM know that there's another RM/RfC here, in case you'd like to comment again. Best, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 19:16, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there

You recently participated in a move request for the Jesus' walk on water article. There was no consensus for the proposed move, but some suggested the new possible title of Jesus walking on water and I have reopened the move request with that as the move target. If you are interested, please contribute to the debate at Talk:Jesus' walk on water#Requested move 2. Thanks!  — Amakuru (talk) 13:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Would appreciate your comments here after your recent participation in this discussion. --Rob Sinden (talk) 10:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the drink. Cheers! --Taiping Tulip (talk) 03:49, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you took part in the previous RM at Bun cha so may wish to be informed it has been submitted as part of a larger RM at Talk:Bun rieu, Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Through this way, I inform there is a discussion about partially disambiguated titles, known as "PDABs". This subguide of WP:D was approved at VPP. I notify you about this because you has participated in at least one RM discussion in which PDAB is cited (in any form). You are welcome to give ideas about the future of this guideline at WT:D or to ignore this message. Tbhotch.^™ Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 05:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Wind Music (record label), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:37, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crimora, Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norfolk Southern Railroad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment here. Thanks. georgianJORJADZE 18:34, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the refs are split between two politicians with the same romaji name. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:48, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Since you participated in either the previous RfC or in a recent related RM you may wish to be informed of Talk:Gia Bình District#RfC: Should non-exonym Vietnam geo article titles have Vietnamese alphabet spellings?. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 11:38, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Feng Shui Family, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taiwanese-language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AjaxSmack, and thank you for your contributions!

An article you worked on Don Varner, appears to be directly copied from http://www.mtv.com/artists/don-varner/biography/. Please take a minute to make sure that the text is freely licensed and properly attributed as a reference, otherwise the article may be deleted.

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on Don Varner if necessary. MadmanBot (talk) 02:54, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings. Because you participated in the August 2013 move request regarding this subject, you may be interested in participating in the current discussion. This notice is provided pursuant to Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification. Cheers! bd2412 T 21:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pennsylvania Route 45 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Route 405|PA 405]], [[Pennsylvania Route 147|PA 147]], and [[Pennsylvania Route 61|PA 61]]). The "middle" section was signed from [[Water Street, Pennsylvania|Water Street]] to Montandon,

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:42, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I removed this file from the article. If you object, care to revert. Otherwise, let me tag {{db-g7}} for you. George Ho (talk) 18:44, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions. As the person who has maintained this article, I should have done a better job there. You apparently didn't contribute to the discussion of whether the article should be split into Yadkin River Veterans Memorial Bridge and Wil-Cox Bridge. The second bridge is historic and I am told that makes it notable.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:03, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Sorry, there's no link to the discussion, so how would you have known? I'm just following guidelines.— Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:25, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Complete Legendary Fargo Concert cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 20:04, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Duke Ellington at Fargo 1940 Special 60th Anniversary Edition cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 22:24, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Fargo 1940 cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 22:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Duke Ellington at Fargo, 1940 Live, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 09:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide your opinion on the alternate proposal to move the article in question to Confederate Arizona. Cheers! bd2412 T 22:55, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I meant that Michael Jackson published Ben in 1972 (the same year in which he has published Got to be There). -- SJ (talk) 01:56, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The Cyrillic alphabet is welcome, of course, but it was presented as if the numbers, which I assume are irrelevant unless the Lezgians practice gematria, were more important than the letters. — kwami (talk) 04:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:Battery Garesche Historical Marker.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:56, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

See http://www.statoids.com/ydz.html , you may like to re-consider your vote on Talk:Communes of Algeria. Also note, that Blofeld moved without discussion:

• 11:11, 19 May 2008‎ Dr. Blofeld (talk | contribs)‎ . . (33 bytes) (+33)‎ . . (moved Municipalities of Algeria to Communes of Algeria: move to commune as this is officially recognised in French) (thank) Androoox (talk) 01:26, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adyghe people may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |''Натыхъуай'' {{IPA-ady|natəχʷaːj|}}, ''Наткъуадж'' {{IPA-ady|natəχʷaːd͡ʒ|}})

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:29, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ji'an, Hualien, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Taitung and Ami language (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Dutch exonyms for places in Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ems (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kuban Oblast, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Southern Russia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! A proposal has been made at Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton#Requested move 8 to change the title of the article, Hillary Rodham Clinton to Hillary Clinton. This notification is provided to you per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification, because you have previously participated in a discussion on this subject. Cheers! bd2412 T 10:27, 1 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Switchman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Traffic police (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 6 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I replied on my talk page, here, and at the article talk page, here. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 18:38, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion has become too much like a debate between the principal editor and me. I am stepping back. Also noticed that the article has incorrectly assigned "B" ratings from several projects because of a bot error. Is there an easy way to correct that? — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 13:58, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

About the ratings, I corrected them from the talk page history. Still hoping for more involvement in the discussion. — ℜob C. alias ALAROB 20:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Because you participated in the most recent discussion regarding the proposed move of Hillary Rodham Clinton, you are hereby notified per Wikipedia:Canvassing#Appropriate notification that the administrative determination of consensus from that discussion is being challenged at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2014 May. Please feel free to comment there. Cheers! bd2412 T 19:19, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I think that it is cultural imperialism to denote South Koreans' name by U.S. style which writes family name back. Please add your comment to my comment in Talk:Syngman Rhee. Thank you! NiceDay (talk) 08:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, due to your previous participation in this discussion, your comments at Talk:Mutasarrifate_of_Jerusalem#In_1882_the_Ottomans_called_it_a_Sanjak.... would be appreciated. Oncenawhile (talk) 08:14, 9 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Besides states-provincial, there was a RM for Talk:Pirate_Party_Germany#Requested_moves. Is this a coincidence or has there been an epidemic lately of re-titling "incorrect English" articles? ^walk victor falk ^talk 02:44, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. FYI I changed Talk:Best... I per Xoloz' suggestion after you commented. Cheers. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Asparagus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taiwanese language. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shall I be bold and then change it to another English name? --George Ho (talk) 19:54, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I made new request on another different title; please join in. --George Ho (talk) 19:46, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joe Carr (Texas musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roots music. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AjaxSmack. There is a page moving discussion at Talk:Khambhat that you might be interested in. Bobby Martnen (talk) 18:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think this is Kauffner? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since you have participated in at least one Requested Move or Move Review discussion, either as participant or closer, regarding the title of the article currently at Sarah Jane Brown, you are being notified that there is another discussion about that going on now, at Talk:Sarah Jane Brown#Requested move #10. We hope we can finally achieve consensus among all participating about which title best meets policy and guidelines, and is not too objectionable. --В²C ☎ 16:46, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

		The Special Barnstar
		Arguably the best user page I have ever seen. I am still laughing, but more important, if I didn't already know your style this would give me a really good idea of how to work best with you. So it does its job of helping us all to improve Wikipedia in an awesomely effective manner. It communicates and encourages. Less is more. Brilliant. Andrewa (talk) 20:48, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly do NOT make unilateral changes without discussion, the precious incarnation was in line with the election articles that are long standing. Kidnlty revert your edit and disucss is.Lihaas (talk) 03:19, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! Since you participated in the move discussion for Angevin, I hope you can help fix incoming links to the page. There are about 36 left. If you could fix even a few of these, it would be a big help. Cheers! bd2412 T 14:19, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may as well add the rest of the archived talkpages (from December 2011) back to the main talkpage. As for the archiving ... Yes, I will admit at some stage it was archived too much, while the one that you changed from 2160 to 18000, the "2160" was the standard for archiving. Adamdaley (talk) 05:03, 22 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SDPofG screenshot.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or provided a license tag. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, select the appropriate license tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you can't find a suitable license tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SDPofG screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AjaxSmack. We cannot use non-free copyrighted material here with permission of the owner while they retain their non-free copyright license. It's impermissible because our promise to our end users is that the content they see here is freely-copyrighted under our licenses (or a compatibly unrestrictive free license) and can be taken and used by them (even for commercial purposes), so long as they comply with the attribution requirements under our licenses. Anything else must be properly claimed as fair use, and we can't even claim fair use for any material outside the mainspace (except for some extraordinary exceptions inapplicable here). This is an extremely common misunderstanding of people who upload content they own for articles (quite understandably-so because copyright is counterintuitive and overly-complex). They license it as some version of "I am giving my permission" then we delete it, usually under CSD F3 which specifically targets among others content files "used with permission".--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 01:31, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Fuhghettaboutit: Thanks! —  AjaxSmack  01:38, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 10:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you moved Beitou from "Beitou District" back in 2011. I believe that the consensus at this point for all districts of Taiwanese cities is to use "Foo District" (see Category:Districts of Taipei and, for other cities, the subcategories of Category:Districts in Taiwan). Beitou is the one exception. Would you oppose if I moved it back to "Beitou District"? If not, I'll move it. If so, I'll open a WP:RM to see what the consensus is. Please let me know. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 15:55, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you were the voice of reason on the Circassians vs Cherkess merge discussion... :-D Wikimandia (talk) 12:31, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

	Thank You
	...so much for the bubble tea you gave me. I've been craving for that! I also want to thank you for your countless contributions in Wikipedia... and for appreciating my edits as well. That means so much to me. See you around!~ 001Jrm (talk) 07:08, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I created and am inviting you to another move discussion; join in. --George Ho (talk) 19:18, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I think consensus has been reached on not renaming the article, but I have to wait the full 7 days before closing. The reason I'm here is because I was impressed with the amount of research you did to support your position, and would like to enlist your help including an etymology section to the article. As you can imagine, there is not a whole lot of information on the etymology of piñon and how pinyon was derived from it in publications about the tree itself. Kehkou (talk) 05:07, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(policy)#RfC:_Guidance_on_commas_before_Jr._and_Sr. Dohn joe (talk) 02:10, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Should you be interested... GregKaye 15:24, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

This is a notification to let you know that there is a requested move discussion ongoing at Talk:Hillary_Rodham_Clinton/April_2015_move_request#Requested_move. You are receiving this notification because you have previously participated in some capacity in naming discussions related to the article in question.

Thanks. And have a nice day. NickCT (talk) 18:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Following the closure of a recent RfC you participated in, I have started an RfC on the separate but related issue of commas after Jr. and Sr.. Please see Wikipedia:Village pump (policy) § RfC: Guidance on commas after Jr. and Sr. and feel free to comment there. Thanks! —sroc 💬 06:03, 14 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Oriya_language#Requested_move_17_June_2015. Thanks. Cpt.a.haddock (talk) 15:38, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I recently started a move request. --George Ho (talk) 05:45, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You participated in a Burma RM in the past so I'm informing you of another RM. I hope I didn't miss anyone. New move attempt of Burma>Myanmar Fyunck(click) (talk) 08:11, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Friulian place names, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hermagor. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Monday Morning (Fleetwood Mac song), AjaxSmack!

Wikipedia editor Maurizio.morandi-1970 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Hi, I think you could improve your article. Look at the unreliable sources tags and solve them. Please go on strong and brave! Thank for your contribute

To reply, leave a comment on Maurizio.morandi-1970's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Quzanlı, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ağdam. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 23 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stonefire89 (talk · contribs) is a bit too enthusiastic with the hiking trails edits as you have already seen. Can you check the reverts of my edits that Stonefire89 has done? 203.173.186.163 (talk) 10:37, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I am "a bit too enthusiastic", am I supposed to just give it all up then?

I do not believe information should just be deleted which is what 203.173.186.163 (talk · contribs) keeps doing. If it needs to be put in the right spot then do it but you shouldn't just delete information.

I will not keep working on anything that will just end up deleted. You seem pretty bent on doing just that, 203.173.186.163 (talk · contribs).

Stonefire89 (talk) 13:16, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your are setting up the fallacy of false dilemma in two of your statements. Give up if you want but the other option is to follow what the highly complex demands of the Wikipedia community demand. You cannot do what you want to do. You have to do what the community as a whole want to do.

And I am not deleting everything you do. I am deleting mistakes and info the does not fir in with Wikipedia. 203.173.186.163 (talk) 05:56, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This really doesn't matter. I'm done. It's not worth putting anything on this site. It's not worth my time or effort to deal with you, 203.173.186.163 (talk · contribs).

AjaxSmack, again, this is my resignation.

Stonefire89 (talk) 21:04, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You say "This really doesn't matter." I don't know what you are referring to specifically but if you are referring to the need to fit in with the rest of the community then you should not be here. On the other hand, if you make valuable contributions that fit in with Wikipedia then there is a lifetime of work for you to do here. 203.173.186.163 (talk) 19:55, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was referring to the fact that I give up. I will not be adding anything to site ever again.

Stonefire89 (talk) 21:02, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your vote here Talk:Hyderabadi biriyani#Requested move 23 August 2015 is likely to be misread as you vote "support move", which is to Hyderabadi Biryani, with a capital B. You might want to strike that and clarify "Keep at Hyderabadi biriyani, oppose merge", as I understand your vote is for that. You weren't the only one to be confused by the nomination: it's to move it to the capitalised form. Ogress _smash! 02:25, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, It looks like Keep votes are needed to prevent an article from being deleted - Photographs of Alan Kurdi. I guess one can call the voting an advisory voting, since a closing administrator will decide on the merits of arguments and guidelines, more so than the voting, if an article will be kept.
Please consider voting, re-voting, or giving a comment in the deletion discussion for Photographs of Alan Kurdi. There does not seem to be a guideline that says that one can not have one article about the Photographs of Alan Kurdi - a set of photographs that has gathered notable reactions - and another article about the boy who is pictured lifeless in the photos, or the events leading to his death.
If one has already voted, one can cast a new vote if one desires (and then one should inform that a vote has previously been cast). Burst of unj (talk) 17:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AjaxSmack,

There is a discussion going on at Talk:Quran that may interest you.

Bobby Martnen (talk) 03:09, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Argayash National Okrug, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bashkiria. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kevin Raleigh - Moonlight on Water.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:31, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Johnny Kemp, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kashif. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RM still ongoing; I invite you to improve consensus. --George Ho (talk) 10:16, 21 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Asian city names in different languages, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Santillana. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

FYI there is an ongoing ANI related to this map, which you have commented in the past. Cheers,--Comptetemporaire2015 (talk) 12:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing—Black pudding —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Hairy Dude (talk) 01:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Standard Mandarin Chinese (language). Since you had some involvement with the Standard Mandarin Chinese (language) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 00:04, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:State of Oman stamp.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to the discussion at Talk:Union Council of Ministers of India#Requested move 12 April 2016. Thanks. Filpro (talk) 01:07, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AjaxSmack, I invite you to the discussions at:

• Talk:Master Control Facility (ISRO)#Requested move 26 April 2016
• Talk:Sirsa, Haryana#Requested move 26 April 2016
• Talk:South Western Air Command (India)#Requested move 26 April 2016
• Talk:Southern Air Command (India)#Requested move 26 April 2016

Thanks. Filpro (talk) 00:00, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to ongoing RfC discussion. --George Ho (talk) 19:24, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Posting this here rather than the RM because I don't think I'll convince you (and I don't intend to -- may a thousand flowers bloom and all that jazz), I'd rather wait for other opinions than pushing the RM into TLDR territory, and I'd also like to discuss some slightly off-topic stuff with you.

Thing is, with WP:PINYIN all the best modern sources in English either use pinyin or provide a detailed and defensive argument why they don't (most of what I have seen from Columbia University Press, and from scholarly sources in general, falls into this latter category). With Korean romanization, though, we have the opposite situation -- the vast majority of English-language reliable sources (at least for pre-modern topics) use McCune-Reischauer or provide a detailed and defensive argument why they don't, and we have texts that aren't specifically about Korean studies (and therefore not concerned with off-topic modern ROK government romanization guidelines), like the Encyclopedia of Buddhism, not even discussing romanization of Korean in terms of MR and RR, and simply calling MR "the standard [convention] for transcription into English".

Also, why are you an anti-Korean chauvinist? Were you tongue-in-cheek quoting Korean nationalists who call you that because you don't think Chinese traditional dress was actually invented by Koreans, or some such?

There was an RFC that I advertised on WT:KOREA to change the guideline from saying "for pre-division topics, use RR" to "for pre-division topics, use MR", and the only one to oppose was an ROK nationalist POV-pusher who agreed with you that RR is better, so I was assuming that that was why a lot of our nationalist, unsourced, junk articles use RR. If anti-Korean chauvinists also prefer RR, then I might have to reconsider my position on this. Do you only prefer RR because all the articles already use RR, or is there a separate reason for it? I ask because the last place you and I interacted was here, where you (appear to have) agreed with me, and in that situation I was taking a pro-internal consistency and pro-status quo position similar to the one you took on the Baekje RM, but preserving the status quo internal consistency is not always a good thing where here, unlike two years ago, the status quo is at variance with the majority of English-language reliable sources. A year before that you definitely agreed with me and were explicit about having a pro-status quo and pro-internal consistancy stance.

Anyway, no harm no foul. I might post some more RMs in a similar area where the ngrams etc. are even more pro-MR than with Paekche, but I'll wait to see what happens first.

Cheers!

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 01:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The guy's been on my tail for weeks now, and every single comment he makes is an inane non-sequitur. Your opposition to the Paekche RM at least made logical sense, but Pldx1 apparently thinks that the RFC template having been automatically removed after a month is "a snow close", and I still can't figure out what "snow" means, as apparently he thinks it favors the minority view. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 08:32, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AjaxSmack, you are invited to participate in the move discussion at Talk:Directive Principles in India. Thanks. Filpro (talk) 16:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You contributed in some capacity to at least one of the recent discussions concerning romanization of Korean for historical topics. Should we use McCune-Reischauer or Revised for topics relating to pre-1945 Korea? If you are inclined, please contribute here. Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 06:28, 6 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In your "oppose" you note that "WP:JR does not prohibit comma usage if sources consistently use it." OK, perhaps I was negligent in not presenting explicit evidence of the extensive style variations around MLK Jr's name and related place and topic names, but such evidence is discussed extensively in the RFC, the MOS talk page about, and in the MLK-related precedents that I linked, so I figured anyone who cared already knew about all that or would see it easily by following what I linked. At your suggestion, I went ahead and added a bit on the style of the MLK Jr Memorial in sources (book hits), as well as some books on MLK Jr himself and MLK Sr, too. If you'd like to see more evidence posted, let me know. Thanks. Dicklyon (talk) 14:38, 12 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Do you know the name of the small island directly east of Kimchaek? It's located at 40.647 N, 129.548 E. I know it's old English name but I don't know what it's called now. ST1849 (talk) 01:52, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

​What's the old English name? —  AjaxSmack  02:42, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nineteenth century American whalers simply called it "White Rock". Yeah, they tend not to be the most creative lot when it comes to naming stuff (e.g. calling an island in the Sea of Okhotsk with the profile of a surfacing bowhead "Bowhead Island"). ST1849 (talk) 03:07, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

According to page 43 of this source from Google Books, it is called Al Som (Nan Do). —  AjaxSmack  00:46, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'll create a stub for it when I have time. ST1849 (talk) 00:57, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kōrēgusu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tōgarashi. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AjaxSmack, you are invited to participate in the move discussion at Talk:Look East policy (India). Thanks. Filpro (talk) 21:56, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jon Daly, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Daly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Iron Lady. Hi AjaxSmack. Given your involvement with the failed move discussion for Iron Lady, you may be interested to vote or comment on the present WP:AFD discussion whether or not to redirect the article to Margaret Thatcher. Thanks. --Nevé–selbert 00:20, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For your information, see Talk:Fossil fuel phase-out#Requested move 17 November 2016.
Kalimera Pouliths (talk) 08:11, 18 November 2016 (UTC).[reply]

This talk page is getting longer. Would you archive the old messages. --George Ho (talk) 06:55, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You were involved in one of previous RM discussions. I invite you to another one. --George Ho (talk) 07:08, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You participated in one of previous RMs. I invite you to another RM discussion. --George Ho (talk) 20:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you're welcome to comment in the RM discussion taking place at Talk:Saraiki dialect. Thanks! – Uanfala (talk) 10:53, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I wanted to reach out to you regarding a title change discussion in Joaquín Guzmán's talk page. You were involved in a previous change there in 2015. I'd love to read your input. Thank you! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 15:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for participating in the RM for Voting system->voting method. It occurs to me that the relevant wikiprojects should probably be notified; this is a relatively central page. As the RM originator, I don't want to risk WP:CANVASS, so I'm asking you: could you post a neutral notice of this RM on wikiprojects you think are relevant? (I've made the same request of User:BrownHairedGirl, who !voted on the other side of the issue; so if she (they?) beats you to the punch, that's fine.) Homunq (࿓) 12:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At Amakuru's suggestion, I did it myself. So no need, thanks. Homunq (࿓) 14:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

​I would add that posting notices to Wikiprojects is not canvassing. Even posting notices to other previous participants is fine as long as you post to all of said participants. —  AjaxSmack  14:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You commented on this debate already, and your voice would be welcome again. Homunq (࿓) 00:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your post on the talk page on the aforementioned article is uncivil. If such another comment is made, you will be reported for incivility.LakeKayak (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) LakeKayak, I'm struggling to see what you find "uncivil" there. An opinion doesn't become uncivil just because you disagree with it. – Uanfala (talk) 21:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: I think how it was said was a little rude more than what his opinion is.LakeKayak (talk) 22:53, 25 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

​I made two comments on that page so I'm not sure which you are referring to. —  AjaxSmack  07:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This one:

No, the term "Mid-Atlantic accent" has one well-established meaning. "Mid-Atlantic American English" is a creation of the Atlas of North American English and the article's only source is that work. The Mid-Atlantic accent article, on the other hand, presents a well-known topic with numerous citations, the overwhelming majority of which use the term "Mid-Atlantic". Comparing the relative weight of the two topics, there is no problem with the current situation with a hatnote header.

LakeKayak (talk) 13:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

RE:(Secondly, "Mid-Atlantic dialect" almost always refers to the blend of American and British English Pronunciation as seen in these Google Books results.) I looked at the example list on Google books which you have provided. And on that list, I found another source that used "Mid-Atlantic dialect" to mean a Philadelphia/Baltimore accent. [27] pg. 432. Therefore, regardless of how "Mid-Atlantic accent" is used, it seems that "Mid-Atlantic dialect" is used to mean a Philadelphia/Baltimore dialect.LakeKayak (talk) 17:33, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: that as the discussion has been closed. I'll answer your question directly here. The evidence that the hatnote hasn't worked is here:

Comment. Surely Transatlantic is more ambiguous than Mid-Atlantic? Transatlantic means "concerning countries on both sides of the Atlantic" or "relating to or situated on the other side of the Atlantic" whereas the Mid-Atlantic states is a defined area (as I write this I was expecting Mid-Atlantic states to be WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for Mid-Atlantic. The phrase Mid-Atlantic pertains more to the US than Transatlantic). Zarcadia (talk) 18:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Comment. @Zarcadia: This page is about a blend of American and British English, hence the ambiguity where Mid-Atlantic can mean two things: this accent and Mid-Atlantic American English. This accent does relate to both sides of the Atlantic, by blending the features of American and British English. Therefore, the accent does fit the definition of the word transatlantic which you have provided.LakeKayak (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Sorry but what do you mean by "this accent and Mid-Atlantic American English", I'm not sure what the difference is? Zarcadia (talk) 21:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Zarcadia, we're on the talk page not of Mid-Atlantic American English, but of Mid-Atlantic accent. I reckon your question would get easily answered if you have glance at the article. – Uanfala (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Someone thought they were on the talk page for Mid-Atlantic American English while they were on the talk page for Mid-Atlantic accent.

As for what I intended to do with the title Mid-Atlantic accent, I intended to link the title to the page Mid-Atlantic accent (disambiguation).LakeKayak (talk) 15:25, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 06:51, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:DustOfAngelsSoundtrackCDCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 12:02, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Re this edit, you might want to review WP:LISTGAPS. —BarrelProof (talk) 23:01, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

​That's the reason for the gaps: to make clear to screenreaders that it's not a list. —  AjaxSmack  23:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting interpretation, but I don't think it fits with what the guidelines say. The example in WP:LISTGAPS is a Talk page discussion, and there is no mention there that Talk page discussions should have blank lines between the bullet items. Also, there is WP:INDENTGAP, which says "This is used, for example, to indicate replies in a threaded discussion on Talk pages. ... Blank lines should not be placed between indented lines of text, ..." —BarrelProof (talk) 23:52, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

​The example at WP:LISTGAPS is two comments within a single thread. Of course I agree those should not be separated. —  AjaxSmack  03:18, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:WuChun-lin - LovingOthersIsAHappyThingCDCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack,

There is a requested move discussion on Talk:Free City of Kraków that I thought you might be interested in.

Genealogizer (talk) 20:51, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack,

Since you participated in the recent WP:RM on the Free City of Cracow, I thought you might be interested in this requested move. (Talk:Kraków uprising) Genealogizer (talk) 22:43, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack,

There's a discussion on Talk:Pavel Ignatieff that I thought you might be interested in.

Genealogizer (talk) 04:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack,

Since you participated in the Free City of Cracow RM, I want to let you know about an RM on Talk:Kraków złoty.

Genealogizer (talk) 04:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you added references for the Ryukyuan names of cities in Okinawa Prefecture. While I appreciate this, I don't agree with the other additions you made. The Japanese and Ryukyuan names use the same Chinese characters; there is no need for katakana. Also, the Okinawan name for Kitanakagusuku does not use the pronunciation "kita" (Japanese) for north (北) but rather "nishi".[28] Similarly, the Okinawan name for Yomitan is "Yuntanja".[29] I will make changes to those articles. ミーラー強斗武 (StG88ぬ会話) 23:24, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

​The names I entered are from the source cited. I'll be happy to send you a scan of the pages cited if you'd like (one is below for as long as it lasts). Please do not change the names based on WP:OR; either delete the citation, change the citation or delete the entire Okinawan language name. —  AjaxSmack  01:44, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

left|400px

Thanks for uploading File:Takihara pp107-108.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 04:30, 14 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up - my theory is for the maturity of an online encyclopedia such as this one that has projects and subject areas as ship rather than maritime such a change is a necessity JarrahTree 23:55, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Takihara pp107-108.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack,

There is an RfC on Talk:Iran that you might be interested in.

Thanks,

Genealogizer (talk) 04:46, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that the request for arbitration in which you were recently named as a party has been declined by the committee and closed. GoldenRing (talk) 19:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are still unaware of this discussion, there is a new discussion for renaming New York to New York (state). As you participated in the previous discussion on this topic, you may want to express your opinion in the new disussion. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 04:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked for a Move review of Usher (musician). Because you were involved in the discussion you might want to participate in the move review. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 16:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move review of Damn (Kendrick Lamar album). Because you were involved in the move discussion for this page, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the move review. — TheMagnificentist 12:14, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack, Given your vote in the RM on Talk:Free City of Cracow, I thought you might be interested in the discussion going on there now. Genealogizer (talk) 16:17, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for ignoring this canvassing at least. In ictu oculi (talk) 08:34, 30 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You'll have seen by the ping from admin Favonian at SPI it was a sock. Does that sound any warning bells? In ictu oculi (talk) 09:41, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The RM has now closed a second time, again inevitably in line with modern British/Irish usage. Do you intend to initiate a second Move Review? In ictu oculi (talk) 16:53, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello.
As per discussion at Talk:Red Dragon (2002_film)#Requested move 8 September 2017, I moved the pages accordingly. But I couldnt figure what to do with Red Dragon (film). Your guidance will be much appreciated. Thanks a lot in advance, —usernamekiran(talk) 19:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Prigorodny District, Republic of North Ossetia-Alania" and "Blagoveshchensky District, Republic of Bashkortostan" have been moved to Prigorodny District, North Ossetia-Alania and Blagoveshchensky District, Bashkortostan, respectively, as proposed. Since this was your proposal, please see to any requisite post-move cleanup of templates and other incoming links. Cheers! bd2412 T 20:36, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What are your further thoughts on this? (Respond at linked page). I've posted some dictionary entry links you might want to take a look at. The Transhumanist 17:32, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a Move review of Grand Duchy of Kraków. Because you participated in the requested move, you might want to participate in the move review. Academicoffee71 (talk) 05:02, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey AjaxSmack, I have reopened the RM discussion at Talk:Chishmy (urban-type settlement), Chishminsky District, Republic of Bashkortostan to address the contested move, hopefully to solicit opinions from more participants. Regards, Alex Shih^Talk 06:04, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

​Thanks. —  AjaxSmack  06:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FujianPeople'sGovernmentFlag.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Single quotes are used for linguistic glosses: Spanish: casa 'house'. This has been a standard in formal publication for something like a century and a half, and MOS has long recognized it. If you've habitually been changing this to double quotes as you did here here, please stop, and just as importantly also go undo your incorrect "corrections" in other articles.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  03:48, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

​Sorry, MOS:SINGLE is new to that section of the MOS since my last visit. I had assumed American-style logical quotes reigned supreme at Wikipedia. However, in the Isle of Man case, don't glosses normally appear immediately after the word they are translating without additional context? If a text reads ...ashwekh, which is Gouldakh for 'antelope',..., is that still a gloss? —  AjaxSmack  04:10, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As a linguist (among other things) by training, I would say "yes, it's still a gloss". It's just a longer version of one. The exact position is irrelevant, it's just that in actual linguistics journal articles and books that position and non-explanatory format tends to be the most common, especially in tabular material (e.g. word lists); the format is conventionalized in professional linguistics material. The semantics aren't somehow transformed just by moving stuff around in more encyclopedic prose. It's more important that we be consistent in the usage. The last thing we need is people editwarring between, e.g. Spanish: casa 'house' vs. Spanish: casa "house"; or 'House' in Spanish is casa vs "House" in Spanish is casa; or Terms for 'house' in Western Indo-European languages are not always cognates: Spanish casa, Irish tí, German haus versus Terms for "house" in Western Indo-European languages are not always cognates: Spanish casa, Irish tí, German haus – plus examples in all those cases using italics for house, plus people using no markup at all around the word, as house. We need to use a consistent format, or we'll be lighting our productive editing time on fire, arguing article by article over tedious style trivia. ;-)  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  04:41, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Two of my diffs in the last hour or two [30][31] illustrate how the constructions can vary, even in the same section, and probably indicate why the consistency is desired. If we didn't have it, then any time someone rewrote a list item or sentence that had etymological information in it, to use not quite the same wording as before, then a style change would be required; but virtually no one would make it (and if they tried, would often do it incorrectly), so we'd end up with random chaos.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ >^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ<  10:01, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Currently there is confrontation with a poster named Mr.Kebab going on in this discussion here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:General_American#John_Samuel_Kenyon He is showing no neutrality and favoritism in his postings. I would like for you to please step in when possible. Thank you. Usernamebradly (talk) 13:28, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. Come and see how this guy makes up accusations towards Wolfdog and continuously assumes his bad faith. Mr KEBAB (talk) 13:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Ajax! I just saw your userbox about overestimating foreign language ability and I liked it so much I want to ask your permission to reuse it on my own page. Do you mind? --Cerebellum (talk) 16:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

​Please feel free to. —  AjaxSmack  18:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! --Cerebellum (talk) 19:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would appreciate some assistance from others in preventing an edit war on the Kauai article. An editor known only as 2602:306:ceab:8320:7c88:ba84:2b8e:c0c9 has removed all use of the 'okina from the article. I don't want to argue with them, so I am asking for assistance. Please help.DaKine (talk) 00:05, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I noticed that you changed Lufei Kui to Lubi Kui. This is incorrect. First, Lufei Kui and his family, never used Lubi. I am his grandson, and I talked to his two daughters and they all want us to change it back to Lufei. Second, I asked in a Lufei family social network, no one uses Lùbì, and no one heard of anyone use Lubi. Third, Lufei family has many prominent people in history but there is no record of anyone used that pronunciation. Please change it back to Lufei Kui. Daqingzhao (talk) 20:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

​Someone already moved it. However, according to Wikipedia practice, you need to have some reliable second-hand sources to support the pronunciation. It seems that "Lufei" is a little more common in English sources but what about the 百度百科 entry, this catalog entry, and this posting? —  AjaxSmack  01:11, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I added Zhejiang Tongxiang Lufei Kui Library as a source. There are other discussions. http://m.blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_502595370102vkj9.html#page=2, and this, http://www.sohu.com/a/190137622_713186. Also today, in China, there are only people with last name Fei, and no one has last name Bi. Cihai is a credible source. How Lufei Kui himself and his family members pronounce the name should take precedence.

Daqingzhao (talk) 01:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

— [[User talk:AjaxSmack|<span style="border:1px solid #93010b;background:#ef0000;padding:2px;color:#efe6e6;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em"><font face="Georgia">&nbsp;'''AjaxSmack'''&nbsp;</font></span>]] : —  AjaxSmack 

to

— [[User talk:AjaxSmack|<span style="border:1px solid #93010b;background:#ef0000;padding:2px;color:#efe6e6;text-shadow:black 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em; font-family: Georgia;">&nbsp;'''AjaxSmack'''&nbsp;</span>]] : —  AjaxSmack 

—Anomalocaris (talk) 06:53, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 07:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! I have started a requested move discussion at Talk:Pączki#Requested move 2 January 2018, regarding a page relating to this WikiProject. Discussion and opinions are invited. Thanks — Kpalion^(talk) 16:25, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to use {{AASHTO minutes}} to cite those documents. Not only does it fill in all of the citation details for you, but as we continue to transcribe the files to Wikisource (Portal:American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials) and get them validated, we'll start linking to the transcribed versions. (Don't worry, the transcribed copies all link back to the scanned PDFs on Commons.) Imzadi 1979 → 21:38, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jambalaya (On the Bayou) sheet music cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:HollandicDialectMap.GIF has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 15:12, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack, this is a blast from the past, but I wondered if you could shed any light on which article from the 1911 Encyclopædia Britannica was used in this edit: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Kyakhta&type=revision&diff=22444540&oldid=18952254 . You added a few paragraphs of text and the {{1911}} template. I couldn't find which article was used. Thanks. DivermanAU (talk) 01:12, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

​I assume it was s:1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Kiakhta. —  AjaxSmack  01:55, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since a year ago you participated in a rename discussion at Talk:Mandarin orange (fruit) you may want to participate in a merge discussion regarding the same pages at Talk:Mandarin orange. Agricolae (talk) 18:37, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Burgabo at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:08, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Shih (talk) 00:01, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

yay

Myname297 (talk) 15:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The essay with more advice is WP:BADGER. Stop bludgeoning. VQuakr (talk) 03:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Have you not read the rules regarding WP:NCCAPS. It clearly states the instance where you should use the proper lowercase notation. The example it gives is deadmau5. Could you please revise your opposition due to Wikipedia having a case where that notation is correct by its own rules?

Thanks. 208.44.170.115 (talk) 16:17, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

​Sorry, I don't see the passage to which you refer. Also, please keep this discussion in the article's RM discussion section. —  AjaxSmack  16:27, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I pasted the wrong link. Here is the right spot: WP:Manual_of_Style/Trademarks#Indicating_stylizations, with the reference of deadmau5. 208.44.170.115 (talk) 16:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm just asking that you take a look at the pre-established rules when referring to artists like moe.. The band's name is only referenced to as "moe." in anything and everything about them. The rule that governs deadmau5, k.d. lang, and other artists, does apply here. Look at this before finalizing your opinion, please. Thanks. 208.44.170.115 (talk) 20:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have asked for a discussion to look at the possibility of moving the category Category:Governors of Nanyo to Category:Governors of the South Pacific Mandate. As you were involved in a similar discussion a few years ago at Talk:South Pacific Mandate#Requested move 19 October 2015, you may be interested in contributing to the category move discussion. - Polly Tunnel (talk) 16:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Satisfy Me (single cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:BILLY SATELLITE -- Satisfy Me.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, if you've got a moment would you be able to change all the links here so they go here instead? Cheers, Anarchyte (work | talk) 11:07, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK! TWICEHIBA (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:AjaxSmack/Huá, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AjaxSmack/Huá and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:AjaxSmack/Huá during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:46, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Origin Enterprises logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:49, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please be advised that there is a proposal to move the Nantucket article back to "Nantucket, Massachusetts" at Talk:Nantucket#Requested move 7 January 2019. Note that the current name was determined by consensus a year ago at Talk:Nantucket#Requested move 6 January 2018. HopsonRoad (talk) 00:47, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

Just letting you know, I've dealt with the eight move reverts you requested. They're now all back at their original titles.

Many thanks,

SITH (talk) 21:47, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A user moved northern marsupial mole without discussion (another user objected in an edit summary and I've reverted it). This user also requested the move of southern marsupial mole as uncontroversial, but it was rejected and is now an RM. S/he also opend an RM for marsupial mole. I was wondering if you could bundle the an RM for the northern species into that of the southern one? Or is it too late? I think the genus could be kept separate. Srnec (talk) 00:21, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

​I suppose a multimove (southern marsupial mole + northern marsupial mole) could be opened in place of the current RM, but that would make the discussion up till now a little confusing/misleading. Maybe your comment there re the issue will suffice for now. —  AjaxSmack  04:54, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I invite you to participate in the civilised discussion about the common English name of the language spoken by the Sinhalese people for the purpose of reaching a consensus. Danielklein (talk) 01:54, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Jerry Rescue has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. 💵Money💵emoji💵^💸 20:57, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there is an RM discussion you may be interested in since you have participated in the past:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Chairman#Requested_move_22_March_2019

Any input would be appreciated. Fyunck(click) (talk) 03:49, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I answered your concern about Ainu language direction. Do you still oppose? Please write in Talk:Ainu language if you have opinions.--ABCEdit (talk) 18:53, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose this new edit by ABCEdit is close to "remerge instead", which we both favored to some degree, but it surely didn't reflect the outcome of the talk page discussion. I haven't been very active lately and I don't know how well I will be able to keep monitoring the situation, but maybe you can help evaluate whether the redirection is warranted, or disruptive. Best, Dekimasuよ! 09:29, 22 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

​I feel the page blanking is a disruptive end run around a failed RM, but I'm not sure the procedure of appeal. Reverting has not worked. —  AjaxSmack  01:39, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe you look at the discussion here. Requested move 2 May 2019 5.18.205.39 (talk) 20:02, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:Mehnde yia.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Loop Line Railway entering Pearse Station in Westland Row, Dublin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:05, 16 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This talk page is becoming very long. Please consider archiving. Geolodus (talk) 11:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are interested, a renaming request of this article is open. 92.184.96.202 (talk) 23:35, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello- I would like to suggest that you never, ever delete what you see as obsolete geographical place name spellings ever again, on the basis of any policy. If you want to add Hanyu Pinyin-derived spellings or put what you see as obsolete spellings into parentheses, that's 100% fine. That's great. That's really useful information. But if you outright delete the historical spellings, then when people search for the place names under those spellings, they won't be able to find what they are looking for. This basically robs the location of its history. ([32]) That's my two cents. Thanks for your time. Geographyinitiative (talk) 05:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Here's an example of how I try to leave room for history while using Hanyu Pinyin-derived forms: Fenghua DistrictGeographyinitiative (talk) 08:32, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The spelling Lungshan Temple (Taipei) is based on the website name 'http://www.lungshan.org.tw/index.html' and the five sources in the lead section. I'm sorry to be aggressive or firm like this, but I think you should know what I'm thinking here. Thanks for your time. Geographyinitiative (talk) 06:10, 4 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Very interesting hypotheticals here and exactly the sort of imaginative thinking we need IMO. I would have just thanked you for the edit but the software doesn't allow me to thank you for creation of a page, only updating it. Andrewa (talk) 02:41, 22 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since you were involved in previous naming discussions, would you like to participate in the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Rivers#Article titles for rivers in Russia, Ukraine and Belarus? Markussep ^Talk 08:06, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Jefferson Starship - Miracles single cover (Spain).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ajax I just added a sentence to the Peter Tosh page because an album was missing. Released 1971 and produced by Leslie Kong, who died a week after the release. It was after that they got Lee Perry to be the producer. The paragraph is jumbled up. My sentence should probably go in before any mention of Lee Perry. Barratt joining the band should be before that. Paragraph is also very long. Best wishes Johnny Johnnyr92 (talk) 11:12, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ajax I could rearrange a few sentences as already mentioned if you prefer that to you doing it. I just messaged you because were listed as the last edit. Johnny Johnnyr92 (talk) 12:08, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

​Do what you'd like. I'm not going to do any more edits to it. Try to source any additions you can. —  AjaxSmack  15:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eko.Lsa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eko.Lsa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Clarityfiend (talk) 06:39, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thought I'd note that this ping didn't go through since your signature needs to come after the mentions. If you sign the line again it will go through. – Thjarkur (talk) 11:12, 5 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:EDDIE MONEY -- I Wanna Go Back.ogg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:28, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:17, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Leucanthemum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daisy. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Albanian exonyms, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of names of European cities in different languages until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:05, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dracaena angolensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dracaena.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I made a partial overhaul of User:AjaxSmack/Disambiguation page traffic test, but then noticed this page was in your userspace, so I probably shouldn't have made such major changes. What do you think? The essay has been cited a few dozen times, so I'm wondering if it may not be time to move it to WP. – Uanfala (talk) 22:38, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

​Thanks for your interest. Do what you'd like -- edit and/or move to WP. —  AjaxSmack  01:23, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Coronapanic. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 6#Coronapanic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. smileguy91^{talk x my huckleberrying} 05:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack! This discussion you started has been archived, but the merge tags remain. Could you follow up as needed or remove the tags? (Courtesy pinging @SMcCandlish, who added the tags) Cheers, {{u|Sdkb}} ^talk 01:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I've performed the mergers and removed the tags. I don't think anyone ever does MoS mergers but me. LOL.  — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 

Hi, I don't know how to ping you from the talk page, but could you check my request there for any reliable sources using the hyphenated term? -Ljleppan (talk) 07:50, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Drogheda United F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Mahon.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Your service is great. WikipedianUser12 (talk) 10:53, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sammy Hagar - (Sittin' on) The Dock of the Bay single front cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint Christopher, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Cristóbal.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Talk:Joe Biden. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:27, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

​I'm curious what specific BLP violation you're referring to here. I've never edited the article in question (that I can remember) and I merely made two comments on the talkpage in response to others' comments. I'm not aware of reference requirements for talkpages. Thanks. —  AjaxSmack  04:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Talk pages are subject to WP:BLP too and your talk page comment was above and beyond. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that talk pages are subject to WP:BLP, but I don't recall saying anything that hadn't been stated previously except to argue that the issue in question probably doesn't warrant coverage in the article. Anyway, I'm fine with my comment being deleted as I don't have a strong interest in the topic. Thanks. —  AjaxSmack  04:36, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The comment that I struck from the talk page was you making an unreferenced assertion of the sort that I cautioned against making in that section. Have a good night. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:54, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, AjaxSmack

Thank you for creating Flagpole of Freedom Park.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:06, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Billy Satellite (2000 album cover).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cushaw, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Squash.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi AjaxSmack, hope you're doing well. I'm not sure if you're aware, but the article you recently expanded from redirect was redirected as a result of consensus at AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bruce Faulconer). I would therefore ask that you self-revert to the redirect and, if you believe the AfD closure was incorrect or new information permits recreation, take the matter to WP:DRV. Best, KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 21:23, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just so there is no understanding, my remarks weren't directed at you, who I thought made a reasonable argument against the proposal. I don't have a problem with an editor speaking their minds. WCM_email 17:12, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 14,620 views (609.2 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of August 2022 – nice work!

theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (she/they) 20:23, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks to you for providing that hook. —  AjaxSmack  23:10, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. If you want to create a RMC for Mon script → Mon alphabet, given what you've dug up, I'll be happy to support. — kwami (talk) 20:37, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Neat! DMacks (talk) 18:28, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you take the time to visit the "Colonials" disambiguation page, you'll find that, in North America, it refers to British North America, which didn't exist until 1783. Oops. Americans has its very own Wikipedia article, so dismissing it as "ambiguous and anachronistic" isn't just counter to WP:POV, it's downright counterfactual. Here's a link to a video for your enjoyment... or at least my enjoyment.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xc27_ssDiSA

Tapered (talk) 20:24, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

​Thanks. It should be "British America" (i.e. pre–1783), not "British North America". I have corrected the link on the "Colonials" page. I said the term "Americans" is ambiguous in the Battle of Oriskany because everyone fighting in the battle was "American", the Rebels, the Oneidas, the Loyalists and Iroquois, with no British soldiers present. —  AjaxSmack  21:57, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to John Coltrane and Johnny Hartman has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:06, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

​Of course the text in question was "a match for prose"; it was a direct quotation presented as such, between inverted commas and with the source given. (I suppose a WP:LONGQUOTE argument could be made, but that doesn't warrant deletion of the edit.) If you could have been bothered to read the source I cited, you could have also seen that the fanpage you cited me for violating is itself in copyright violation as it copies the same text I cited, but with no attribution. Here is an image of the source. —  AjaxSmack  23:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the part that was a quotation. Sorry for the mistake. Not all was a quotation though, so some of your addition remains deleted. — Diannaa (talk) 23:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is something that has weighed on my mind for quite some time and I'm glad that you raised it with your good faith edits to Xinxiu bencao. If you actually looked at the sources cited in the article, it is clear that Chinese titles are capitalised sentence-style, rather than headline-style for English-language works. That is to say only the first letter of the first word should be capitalised... This is the academic convention and WP:PINYIN absolutely does not contradict what I've just said. This should be clarified elsewhere and as you pointed out Category:Chinese medical texts (and many others!) is flush with bad titling (but I haven't the inclination to edit them right now). Cheers, KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 13:52, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

​The reason that so many of those works have title caps is that each word of the title should be capitalised per WP:PINYIN ("English Wikipedia uses pinyin as the default Romanisation method for Chinese characters") because, as Section 4.9.2 in this source points out, pinyin title cap rules are the same as English (i.e. "If a proper noun consists of two or more words, capitalize the first letter of each word."). User:LlywelynII noted this in the MOSCHINA talk page a while back with no objection and the relevant Wikipedia article calls for this practice as well. Others sources may have their own house styles, but those typically do not override Wikipedia's own (e.g. The Economist does not capitalise "second world war"). —  AjaxSmack  19:01, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate the elaboration, but I'm not buying it. I hardly find that a lone editor's spiel should be taken as gospel truth, and neither should the status quo be seen as unchangeable. It's very simple to me: it's simply incongruous to insist on using our own "house style" when the very sources cited don't render the titles that way! (Ironically, Llywelyn's random example of "Honglou Meng/meng" backfires, as a quick Google search shows that scholars worth their ilk refer to it as "Honglou meng". Same goes for virtually any other major Chinese work, with exceptions like the I Ching. There is some admission of simply wanting to avoid the hassle and confusion of changing the status quo, in that they recognise that they don't actually better than some hypothetical "powerful citation" but somehow titling Chinese works sentence-style "appears" to be "wrong".) I will also note that Wikipedia:Naming conventions (capitalization)#Works and compositions explicitly gives us this latitude: "Capitalization in foreign-language titles varies, even over time within the same language. Retain the style of the original for modern works. For historical works, follow the dominant usage in modern, English-language, reliable sources." KINGofLETTUCE 👑 🥬 20:56, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Kingoflettuce: Nah. You don't have to buy it. You do need to buy one of the authoritative sources on pinyin (or find a free copy online) and share your findings if you want other people to buy what you're selling. You can't default to a "dominant usage" that doesn't actually exist, since transcriptions of titles is all over the place among the Chinese themselves (who consider romanized titles a learning aid to the actual character titles) and the scholars who write about Chinese from within the traditions of their own languages' capitalization rules. You also can't just talk about it in random people's talk pages. You need to take it MOSCHINA.

Otherwise you end up with exactly what I was talking about: You thinking you're right and creating needless makework as people edit war all over the place and you eventually ending up with administrative sanctions since you're the one not following the MOSCHINA style guide. You may be perfectly right that there's an established convention now to create ugly and confusing European-style sentence case forms of Chinese titles within English. Go prove it and get it added to the style guide. — LlywelynII 00:58, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This obviously isn't binding but these guys—including a Taiwan district court judge—were trying to improve legal citations from Chinese sources with copious reference to the available style guides and use standard title case (with correct PRC pinyin treatment of e.g. de) consistently. It really is worth looking for actual sourcing like that since for each "I hit Google", I can give you, "yeah, well, I went to Google Scholar and, well, they're just inconsistent." — LlywelynII 01:12, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

​​I am copy and pasting this discussion here as a more appropriate location and to elicit wider input. —  AjaxSmack  01:23, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Four on the floor (transmission) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 December 5#Four on the floor (transmission) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. A7V2 (talk) 07:32, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As much as it might feel good to opine on Wikipedia's reputation amongst others in that AfD, that isn't the ideal venue for such comments. I've removed your comment to the talk page as it was off-topic to the matter of whether or not the article should be kept based on Wikipedia's policies and not on what outside political entities think., and runs the risk of turning the AfD into another MKUCR clusterfuck. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{a little blue Bori} 22:09, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A7V2 (talk) 06:27, 21 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hojo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Howard Johnson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can I suggest you a little edit on the "Alligator" article? (I'm asking to you since it's a protected page) 79.17.93.63 (talk) 10:33, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you have anything in particular in mind? —  AjaxSmack  14:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think that in the introduction it should be written "reptile" instead of "reptile" 79.17.93.63 (talk) 18:23, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, why the hell not. You can also make requests on the article's talk page or create a Wikipedia account. —  AjaxSmack  19:07, 9 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Conrad (name), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Coonrod.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Cartney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jalen Folf (talk) 00:01, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Horror aequi at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Surtsicna (talk) 07:47, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Rohdenburg (2003) pp 236-43.pdf. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Live by the Bay - screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Live by the Bay - screenshot.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is no need to restore resolved discussions to the talk page. Unless you want to dispute that "I Drink Wine" is the third single from the album or challenge the GA review, unarchiving neither of the discussions makes sense. A 14-month old discussion is in no way recent.--NØ 18:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

​The last discussion on the page was from less than a week ago and should not be archived under any circumstance. '"Unless you want to dispute..." The utility of talk page discussions is not only for purposes of disputing; a very recently closed RM discussion is still relevant to those wanting to know the outcome of the discussion.

The entire talk history is only 24K (WP:PREMATUREARCHIVE recommends archiving at 75K), so there's really no "page loading time" issue in 2024. Having an entirely blank talk page with 24K of material and a redundant archive is pointless. —  AjaxSmack  20:38, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I saw your question here and wanted to point out that the cited source states that the farm was "about 1,100 acres", rather than simply one thousand. But your question is still good for the general case, so I thought I'd bring this up here rather than there. Regards, Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 02:13, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

​Thanks. —  AjaxSmack  07:44, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am going to talk to you Julia Michaels lol 104.220.21.170 (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sammy Hagar - (Sittin' on) The Dock of the Bay single front cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. George Ho (talk) 02:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Moldavia Province, Ottoman Empire has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 6 § Moldavia Province, Ottoman Empire until a consensus is reached. Super Ψ Dro 12:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Baghdad Street, Singapore has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non notable street

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 48JCL TALK 00:36, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:JIMMY BUFFETT -- A Pirate Looks at Forty.ogg has been proposed for deletion. The proposed deletion notice added to the file should explain why.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:

• File:JIMMY BUFFETT -- Cheeseburger in Paradise.ogg

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hung Cao, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hung Cao (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Move review/Log/2024 July regarding a requested move in which you participated. The thread is Wikipedia:Move_review/Log/2024_July#Srebrenica_massacre. Thank you. 122141510 (talk) 02:44, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Chinese coins has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 8 § Chinese coins until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 18:14, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ain't That a Kick in the Head?, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capitol Collectors Series.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:52, 23 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]