User talk:JamesVilla44

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to 2019 Bahrain Grand Prix has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: 2019 Bahrain Grand Prix was changed by JamesVilla44 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855695 on 2019-03-30T20:28:24+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:28, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JamesVilla44! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Doctree (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:30, 30 March 2019 (UTC)

An article you recently created, 2019 English Football League play-offs, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, you can move the article back to the mainspace. SSSB (talk) 18:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

2018–19 Derby County F.C. season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Harry Wilson

2018–19 Rotherham United F.C. season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jota

2019–20 EFL League One (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hummel

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at John Terry, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 22:20, 23 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone work with me on this? I need to know how to move the references box below League One, League Two and Championship JamesVilla44 (talk) 14:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Jack Grealish. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why have I been blocked? JamesVilla44 (talk) 08:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

2018–19 Aston Villa F.C. season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Paul Tierney

2019 English Football League play-offs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Paul Tierney

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Can you unblock me so I can fix it please? JamesVilla44 (talk) 09:16, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve been blocked again JamesVilla44 (talk) 10:25, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Clearing an autoblock

Due to the nature of the block applied we need additional information before we can decide whether to unblock you. It is very likely that you are not personally blocked. If you are prevented from editing, it may be because you are autoblocked or blocked because of your IP address. Without further details there is nothing further we can do to review or lift your block. Please follow these instructions:

1. If you have a Wikipedia account, please ensure that you are logged in.
   Your account name will be visible in the top right of this page if you are.
   If it isn't, try bypassing your web browser's cache.
2. Try to edit the Sandbox.
3. If you are still blocked, copy the {{unblock-auto|...}} code generated for you under the "IP blocked?" section. This is usually hidden within the "What do I do now?" section. If so, just click the "[show]" link to the right hand side to show this text.
4. Paste the code at the bottom of your user talk page and click save.
5. If you cannot edit your own talk page, then use the Unblock Ticket Request System.

If you are not blocked from editing the sandbox, then the autoblock on your IP address has already expired and you can resume editing. Woody (talk) 14:35, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think it was due to an ip address. Been able to edit since Monday night. JamesVilla44 (talk) 15:33, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, at last someone has noticed the data sort values I started implementing. It only took 7 GP. I was starting to get worried that id have to do this for the rest of time. thanks again for the attention to detail. SSSB (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just one thing. When you insert data-sort-values make sure that you use " rather than “ otherwise it sorts by quotation marks as I use have already used the former. SSSB (talk) 12:05, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Its important to make sure that you use consistent quotation marks, otherwise it will sort by the type of quotation mark. Therefore if someone has already started putting in data-sort-values make sure you use the same quotation marks. Thanks, SSSB (talk) 08:36, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

SSSB (talk) 16:48, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your trying to update 2019 FIA Formula 2 Championship article, but please do not clutter up the page's history with one cell edits like here. There is nothing impossible to do the table update in one take. Cheers. 16:03, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Brighton & Hove Albion F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stamford Bridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:08, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the preview function and do the whole article in one save instead of 100 little saves adding only a few words at a time. Wikipedia is not a news source. Do it once and do it right. There is no rush. It is is not a race against other edittors. --Falcadore (talk) 15:36, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was dealing with vandalism and when I was doing large edits they didn’t count as “Error. Edit not saved” happened over and over again. JamesVilla44 (talk) 15:51, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

So if I do large edits they don’t save due to other edits (mostly vandalism) making them not save JamesVilla44 (talk) 15:51, 14 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Edit Conflict section explains how to get around that dilemma. You copy in your failed edit and paste into the section containing the current page. --Falcadore (talk) 02:13, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Falcadore: who cares. Stop making a mountain out of a mole hill. SSSB (talk) 06:36, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Grealish. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:35, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Having watched some footage on Sky Sports F1, I changed Max's reason for retiring as "Collision damage/suspension". But someone has gone and reverted it to "Accident", which it certainly does not look like that to me since he had no control over the crash. I don't want to start an edit war, but what is you're opinion on the matter? 80.192.54.128 (talk) 15:30, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Per Wikipedia:Redirect#Do not "fix" links to redirects that are not broken, it is not necessary to "fix" redirects as you did here[1][2]. DrKay (talk) 07:15, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hamilton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lord Hamilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:46, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not update the race report while the race is ongoing per Wikipedia:WikiProject Formula One/Updates#After a race. Thank you. ^{Babymissfortune} 13:41, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will not edit war. JamesVilla44 (talk) 12:53, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry - that's confusion due to WP:EDIT CONFLICTs. I was trying to revert the other editor who is edit warring, not you - but you kept making tiny edits and conflicting with me. Could you please make your small edits again now that I've done that. Unfortunately you made so many little edits in a row that I can't redo them all individually. I think, in the end, the effect of the edits of yours I reverted was only a change to a link to Iraq war, and I wasn't sure why you needed to WP:PIPE that, so I left it for you. Thanks, and sorry for the confusion/inconvenience. -- Begoon 13:01, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Iraq War has been removed? JamesVilla44 (talk) 13:06, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's not in the lead any more - I didn't notice that. It's part of the large addition one editor was repeatedly adding despite the disagreement of four other editors who asked for it to be discussed on the talk page as they didn't consider the edit as a whole WP:NPOV - so your minor stylistic change got swept away with it. -- Begoon 14:31, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I was editing someone's edit war then JamesVilla44 (talk) 14:40, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- yes, basically, in the middle of it... Your stylistic change was to a part of the disputed, repeatedly reverted content at the same time as I was trying to remove it again, as not having consensus... -- Begoon 14:50, 30 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi James,

I see that you do not seem to use the Help:Minor_edit tick box much for your edits: I use it a lot. The reason I mention it is that I expect people are usually content with your changes and your use of the tick box would help me and others. As the Help page says, 'Logged-in users can set their preferences not to display minor edits.' I do this as it saves me time by reducing the number of changes I have to review on pages I watch. However, you know better than me the extent to which your edits give rise to opposition, so up to you, of course. Jontel (talk) 09:39, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Endorsements in the 2015 United Kingdom general election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Green parties in the United Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Aston Villa F.C. 7-2 Liverpool F.C. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aston Villa F.C. 7-2 Liverpool F.C. until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Evan0512 (talk) 18:28, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:JamesVilla44/sandbox/2. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Bait30  ^{Talk 2 me pls?} 02:34, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don’t see why you thought the page was a hoax but you can delete the page if you want JamesVilla44 (talk) 08:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 1979 South African Grand Prix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Jones.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No it doesn't because the qualifying times still has precedent meaning Sainz who originally was due to start P7 can't come ahead of Bottas who dropped to 6th and then 5th because of Max 5-place drop. Manvswow (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You will see that I corrected myself JamesVilla44 (talk) 13:02, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/1056380060 JamesVilla44 (talk) 13:03, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Seems FIA changed their minds lol Manvswow (talk) 14:00, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I was right initially it seems JamesVilla44 (talk) 16:42, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi James. I am not sure what you are trying to achieve on your user page in these edits? It looks like you are predicting the outcome of the 2024 general election? Please take a look at WP:FAKEARTICLE. I suggest you either delete it, or if you are just experimenting, move it to your sandbox. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 10:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for adding the latest race results to 2022 GB3 Championship, but please, just do it in one big edit for the whole table and not a thousand small ones, it completely clutters up everybody's watchlist, or at least set the edits as minor edits so they can be filtered out.

Thanks! H4MCHTR (talk) 15:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi James, Thanks for your edits, particularly to Tamworth railway station. However, the number of edits that you make in a row could feasibly be combined into one single edit - when using source mode, you can click on "Preview changes", which will not publish the changes, but shows you what they look like if they were to be. If in visual mode, you can switch to source mode at the top right of the editing box and click that as well. Doing so will be of benefit to users who watch these pages, and their watchlist will be a bit less clogged with your changes, when they are all contained in one single edit. Hope that makes sense, and thanks once again. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 06:44, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please note my concern - ten edits to Stoke-on-Trent railway station is blindly excessive and clogs up other editor's watchlists. Please try to combine edits into one large one as much as possible. I know you're doing good work, but please bear this in mind. As I suggested above, use the "Preview changes" button in source mode to your advantage. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 15:43, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

understood JamesVilla44 (talk) 15:50, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattdaviesfsic Note that three of those edits were labelled as minor edits and most of the work was done in one big edit. (+1,325) JamesVilla44 (talk) 15:59, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm very aware of that, but my point still stands. Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 16:03, 18 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hijacking this topic to once again ask you to be mindful of this, as you are doing it again right now at 2023 GB3 Championship. Adding the results of 25 drivers in 25 edits helps no one, just take the time to do it in one big edit. Thank you, H4MCHTR (talk) 14:06, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you need technical help with a move, you can post it at WP:RM/TR. I have fixed Shadow Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and requested speedy deletion of the redirects Shadow Deputy Prime Minister of the Kingdom (without "United") and Placeholder Shadow Deputy PM as created in error. SilverLocust 💬 13:40, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been adding text to the station articles like The typical off-peak service is one train per hour in each direction between Bletchley and Bedford which runs on weekdays and Saturdays but at the same time you have updated the service box like

Preceding station	National Rail			Following station
Bow Brickhill		London Northwestern Railway Marston Vale Line Monday-Friday only		Aspley Guise

So which is it? Mon-Fri or Mon-Sat? 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 00:34, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The typical service is Monday to Saturday hourly.

But the service being operated for the rest of the year is a weekday only limited service. JamesVilla44 (talk) 12:13, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that one or other needs to be changed and add a footnote if appropriate. As it stands, it looks like a silly oversight. IMO, per WP:NOTGUIDE, the Monday-Friday only needs to say Monday-Saturday only, since that is the contractual service. Is there a BRP on Saturdays? --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 12:58, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a BRP on Saturdays yes JamesVilla44 (talk) 13:05, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Are you happy with the changes JamesVilla44 (talk) 13:10, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, thanks. That hits the spot. --𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 17:41, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Nine-dart finish, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bahrain Darts Masters.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:50, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Darlaston James Bridge railway station, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:13, 8 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dave Chisnall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joe Cullen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:06, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gary Anderson (darts player), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Perez.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove the Belgian Darts Open nine dart finishes again from the article. The Belgian Darts Open is always broadcast live in full, including those two finishes, on Belgium's major VTM2 television channel. You're belief that they weren't televised is wrong. The UK isn't the only country in the world which broedcasts darts on TV. See my comments on the article's talk page as well!! Tvx1 16:07, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not the person you need to convince on that. But the consensus was not to include them. You’re gonna have to gain a consensus for inclusion if they’re gonna stay there. JamesVilla44 (talk) 16:32, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something that can be so easily verified with reliable sources shouldn't need a cosensus from an extensive discussion. Tvx1 12:56, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

“You’re belief that they weren’t televised is wrong”

You’re targeting the wrong guy JamesVilla44 (talk) 16:41, 19 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By winning Players Championship 15 was Littler's 7th title of 2024 this is referenced by the bbc and sky, this does not include the cheshire open that was an exhibition. where are you adding it.it was not professional check it out. the British Internationals are included in his youth career wins ok 92.251.148.22 (talk) 11:23, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamesVilla44. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Charlie Martin (darts player), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JamesVilla44. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cam Crabtree, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Matthew Edgar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakeside Country Club.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, would it be necessary if i added the rep table like previous years ? (Although it hasn't been used for a few years)... Just a thought?... If you look on my sandbox, I've kinda made a start. You'll see what I mean. If it's not necessary then I'll not add it. L1amw90 (talk) 20:59, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be useful, but obviously we can only use it if we can get a consensus to. JamesVilla44 (talk) 21:05, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, on my sandbox, I've made a start on the stats table, but I don't wanna add it to the page if it's not needed. I'm not sure where I would get references from to show the player stats like averages etc... You'll see what I mean 😃 L1amw90 (talk) 09:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I was saving the newly-created 2025 in PDC, saw an edit conflict as you had saved your edit four minutes ago, but mistakenly saved all I had done with my edit. My apologies if that caused some issue, undid few corrections you have performed, so there should not be a major issue, just wanted to be fair and apologize beforehand. Hope you are doing well! Kind regards and Happy New Year!! :) Dimitar Malamov (talk) 16:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect 2026 PDC World Darts Championship has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 January 1 § 2026 PDC World Darts Championship until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 17:46, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Simon Whitlock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gary Anderson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hey JamesVilla44, accidentally reverted your edit instead of the IPs due to a misclick, apologies for any inconveniences caused. wafflerrs ^talk! 22:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, easy to misclick when there’s so much vandalism going on JamesVilla44 (talk) 22:13, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Heya, just going back through past AfDs and I saw your comment on the Michael Meaney (darts player) AfD about some sources being hidden behind an institution paywall. You might find access to WP:The Wikipedia Library handy for this - it's what I use to access the ProQuest articles and it comes in handy for deletion discussions. Best regards and UTV — ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 20:41, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We need some consistency on the use of flags in high checkout etc. in the darts articles as in some articles we use them and some we don't. It is very confusing for editors. I agree with you with the flag when it's only 1 player, but either way we need some consistency. AJP2406 (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

We’ve been asked by an admin to not use them in new articles for nine dart finish and high checkout in articles from now on. So just follow that. There is consistency in the 2024 pages. If it were up to the main darts editors they’d be used but there’s no point getting yourself in a fight with an admin when they’re backing ItsKesha. JamesVilla44 (talk) 21:48, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. It's a bit silly though that the main editors of articles can't decide how articles are laid out but it's whatever. AJP2406 (talk) 22:29, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but none of us have permissions to write the rules on manual of style JamesVilla44 (talk) 22:30, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]