View text source at Wikipedia
|
Hey ,houldn't
Thanks a ton for the information that you gave. I do know that some of them may have done it thinking it is personal pages. So need not worry I just asked you to know why they keep doing like that. Our's is an organization that works with young people in helping them know good morals and God Himself. Many of our viewers are eargly searching for our website. Since it is under another banner we thought we might as well post an article here so that people can get in touch with us through this page .
Thanks a lot for the info, we are praying for you. God bless you brother!
What is your occupation and what is it that you have got to do with ON FIRE? Are you a part of them too or just another person who is part of wikipedia? Do you really have any another relation with any other organizations too?
Hello friend!! My occupation is nothing but to share the word of God. I have got nothing to do with ON FIRE because it is not my organization, but I do confess that I am part of that organization too and part of wikipedia. I may or may have but right now I am with ON FIRE and I think that will do for you. rencin24 13:05, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
My question is wether are you employed only in this organization alon or do you work some where else too? I f so where is that, Just to know you more? Just consider me as friend. This is Nick.
Hey Nick, I am currently working in an MNC.I Really appreciate you for being straight forward and thanks for putting in your name. I work for General Electrical here in INDIA which is famously known as GE. I am visa processor. I process visa for the employees to travell to USA and UK.
Hey what happened to the website that was here or the webpage? I am not able to find it? Please do direct me to the current page you have created. Thanks. Nick.
The best way forward is to write an original article, supported with references to both your book and the paper that the original article was copied from. Write it in your own words. But remember Wikipedia policies - write it in a way that is neutral. Wikipedia cannot assert that something is true, it needs to report on it - think about writing the article as if it were written by an outsider, one who neither follows the church, nor is hostile to it. I'll try to help if I have time. Guettarda 14:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
[1]. This page is having some kind of an abuse. Thanks. Nick.
Hi Rencin.
You asked me to look, so I did. What I see is you vandalizing a talk page by removing any comments you disagree with. If you're referring to the article and not the talk page, I don't see where anyone has made inappropriate edits. Is there a specific edit you disagree with, or do you just not like people questioning TPM on the talk page? --Onorem 11:04, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
The talk page is there so that people can have discussions about the article. It is an appropriate place to voice concerns about the credibility of things mentioned in the article. I don't know -anything- about the topic you're discussing there and wouldn't be qualified to comment, but to me it looked like "Pastor Alvin" raised a few potentially valid questions which were erased instead of addressed. People are going to make changes to pages you spend time on, and it can be frustrating to see something you've worked hard on changed, but there is no ownership of articles. It's there for everyone to contribute to. --Onorem 13:27, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Hello Rencin,
I've noticed you're helping out by adding {stub} and {cleanup} tags.
A couple of notes for stubs:
As for the {cleanup} tags...I did remove a couple of them. The article for Island City, Oregon looks very similar to most articles for small towns in the US, and I'm not sure which part of My Early Burglary Years you thought needed to be cleaned up. There's not a lot of information there, but it seems to be presented well.
Thanks for taking an active part in keeping Wikipedia clean and organized. --Onorem 11:52, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Finding the articles that should be tagged for deletion is the tough part. I regularly check for articles with N next to them on the 'Recent changes' link that should be under 'navigation' on the left side of your screen. Those are newly created articles, which I think are the easiest to check. I'll also usually check the 'User contributions' of users that have created nonsense articles or vandalized in some other way.
I'm not sure what you mean by "how do I become a wikipedia User". You're already a wikipedia user. --Onorem 12:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rencin,
It would be difficult to create articles for each of the chief pastor. You should have enough material about each person. Secondly, it would have to meet wikipedia rules too. You may try if you chose to. I was just thinking of putting a list of all prior chief pastors on "TPM" article.--Spm2006 17:10, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
I have rarely seen such chutzpah even on the New Page Patrol. What you did is nothing but vandalism. - CrazyRussian talk/email 15:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi Rencin. You're clearly new round here and part of the joy of being new is making mistakes. You've made a few here...
Unfortunately for you, the worst thing about all of this is actually pure bad luck and not your fault - the editor you've accused (incorrectly IMHO) of being uncivil is in the middle of a sensitive nomination for becoming an admin again and his civility or lack of it is rather critical.
May I suggest... if, now things have calmed down, you agree with me on all of the above points, please go to czrussian's talk page and erase your comment, along with an edit summary that says something along the lines of you changing your mind and he wasn't uncivil. I'm sure that if you do this, czrussian will return the favour and return here and blank the warning. After all, you are a newbie.
I hope you take this in the genuine spirit in which it is intended. It's not so long since I was a newbie. --Dweller 10:20, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pastor Don.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
If you end your comments on talk pages with 4 "tildes" (~~~~) the system will automatically sign and date your comments.
Thanks for uploading Image:Pastor Don.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).
The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}
. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.
Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. thunderboltz(Deepu) 06:20, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Links for Wikipedians interested in India content |
||
Newcomers: Welcome kit |
Register: Indian Wikipedians |
Network: Noticeboard | Discussionboard
Browse: India | Open tasks |
Deletions
|
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Pastor Don.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. NauticaShades(talk) 07:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey, I saw that you were expressing dismay at the fact that some of your pages were being deleted (and yes, I voted for deletion of the Pastor Don page). You didn't seem to understand why these deltions are occurring, claiming that you had asked for help to make the article better. I thought I'd explain why these articles are going up for deletion to help you out so when, in the future, you make other articles you can avoid having your work deleted.
Wikipedia is a secular/objective encyclopedia with a very strong policy of requiring all articles to fit in the Non-Point of View policy. You clearly stated, in your defense of the article, that you are simply 'trying to promote the word of God.' Evangelism does not fit in NPOV policy; wikipedia articles can't take a stance on whether or not God exists or which religion's God's exists. Thus you can't make an article that assert things like "Right from an early age, he had a Passion and a love for things of God and a desire to serve Him." This language is infused with a Christian viewpoint. A more proper way of phrasing it would be something like "From an early age he was raised in a Christian setting which led him to develop strong religious feelings." Not all readers of the Wikipedia believe in God and putting things in overtly religious language amounts to pushing one point of view over others.
Furthermore, even if the article had been written in an objective manner, the fact remains that the man was not sufficiently notable to get an article on the wikipedia. This is not to say that he wasn't a good man, I'm sure he was. However, the Wikipedia can't be a repository of information on every Past whose ever lived. That would open it up to being available to offer a memorial to every person who'd ever lived, which simply isn't possible. This is not a place for a memorial. An individual has to be relatively famous to justify having an article on the wikipedia and this person simply didn't meet this requirement. --The Way 10:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
I've replied to your query of Cattlegirl. Jpe|ob 11:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello Cattlegirl I just want to know how to find out new users and give them a welcome note. Would be great if you can help me.Thanks. rencin24 rencin24 11:18, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
{{Subst: Welcome}} ~~~~ This is for I.P. addresses. {{Subst: Welcome2}} ~~~~ This is a longer welcome for registered users. {{Subst: Welcome3}} ~~~~ This is a shorter welcome for registered users.
Happy to help- CattleGirl 11:27, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Rencin,
Sorry, but I don't know how I can help out with this. My only advice is that you need to find sources for the article. I tried finding information, but it doesn't seem like there are many articles about him online. Where did you get the info to write the article?
--Onorem 13:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I did some revision of the article on Pastor Spiers to make it more like other Wikipedia biographies. Please take a look to see if I made factual mistakes. I would have loved to see that 1933 Future van on the road. I don't know if that will satisfy the deletionists, but it sounds like he had enough notability, based onn his position in the church and his earlier Youth Ministry position with Oral Roberts and David Wilkerson. What did you base the article on? Did he write any books? Were any articles written about him? We look for verifiable sources to establish notability. Take a look at the articles Muhammad, Pope John Paul II, Mother Theresa, Oral Roberts, Billy Sunday and Billy Graham to see that the faith of the article subject is not presented as fact, and how the article stays an objective account of their life and work.Edison 19:23, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Did one more pass to try and put it in a style which might escape deletion. I accidentally posted my previous communication to you on your user page instead of here. Do you want to remove it or shoud I try to? I don't want to do any more damage.Edison 07:59, 7 October 2006 (UTC)
The way to write good articles, without running into questions of notability, is to have sources in hand before one starts, to only use sources that are independent of the subject of the article, and to cite those sources in the article from the very first edit. If you want to write a biographical article on a person, have independent biographies of that person, magazine feature articles on that person, news articles about that person, and so forth already to hand. Write what those sources say, and only what they say. Don't do original research and write a biography from firsthand experience or primary research. Find, use, and cite sources. Uncle G 12:07, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Please disregard my message regarding vandalizing. It had been sent to an IP address of an anonymous user who was adding his name to a page. I have no idea how you got that message, unless you are using the same computer or the IP address of the the computer used in that case was masked. My apologies. Take care. --Antorjal 13:36, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
You needn't necessarily be a member of a particular wikiproject to work on articles that come within their scope. Signing up is voluntary, and mostly just a formality. To sign up for a particular wikiproject, just add your name to the members list. For example, to add yourself to the India Wikiproject, just add your username to the list of "Active members". You can do the same for the Kerala project.--thunderboltz(Deepu) 13:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey cattlegirl, can you do me a favour like you I tried to put some userboxes but looks like it is not working. So in case if you are free and if you would like to add some to my page then go ahead. I will really appreciate you for this. rencin24 rencin24 10:40, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
This Houston-based evangelist is from India. The article on him is pretty negative. Do you have access to any info on his significance in India?Edison 15:57, 12 October 2006 (UTC)
One reference says he lives in a $160,000 house, which would be modest for the Houston area, and the expense of the jet is already criticized in the article. It is generally cosidered best in Wikipedia to work the criticisms into the text of the sections of an article, but I have seen cases where ther is indeed a separate criticism section. Would he be considered a Telugu person, based on the region of his birth? Any info on his year of birth?Edison 12:55, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Lets put it together (proposed revisions)on the Talk page for the K.A. Paul article. Per biographies of living persons policies, we must stick to published comments to avoid lible if there are first-hand accounts which are negative. Thanks!Edison 13:17, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Rencin, you wrote on my talk page about the need for sources, claiming you didn't get what many of us meant in saying there aren't sufficient sources for the Pastor Don article. You offered a source; the link did not work and, judging from the name of the website I gather that the source was probably an obituary or some other kind of memorial which really isn't a proper source, at least on its own, for an encyclopedia. You also said that I should go ahead and delete the article if I don't like it; I, nor any other singly editor, do not have that authority, we work through consensus and such on the wikipedia. I understand you're a bit frustrated and I would REALLY like to recommend that you spend an hour or two reading the guidelines on what is and is not appropriate for wikipedia articles and sources, there are a large number of articles linked to under 'help' and other areas of the main page of wikipedia that explain objectivity, proper sources and so on. A lot of your frustrations seemingly stem from not understanding, or having been exposed to, this information; review it and I think you'll gain a better understanding of the wikipedia and, in turn, you'll enjoy editing here more. --The Way 04:04, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Cattle Girl can you just help me with the right tag that I need for this. I did upload and tagged but not sure. will please your help. Thanks. rencin24 rencin24 08:25, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Pramod.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
I've been browsing and I've found this project. Thought you might be interested! I also think there's a number of sub projects on Indian states. See you around- CattleGirl talk 06:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
Hey Rencin, thanks for the message on my talkpage. I'm not sure what you want me to do with the articles? Just copy-editing? I edited K.A. Paul because I came across it on recent changes patrol - I'm not really familiar with the topic. Let me know what you want me to do, I'll try to help. riana_dzasta 11:39, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
According to this (from the official unofficial site), they will be in Bangalore, India on 15th January. I don't think that they've settled on a specific venue, though. I hope that this helps! :-) --3M163//Complete Geek 09:00, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to get back to you late! I sent you an email to your gmail account long time ago. What is your email id?
I was going through the changes in the pentecostal mission article. I am not sure about some of the links. especially the one article about the centenerry celebrations. I think it references some other groups. Or am I wrong.
Please reply. thanks RS CA 07:16, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for the reply. The article that you referenced mentions some orater named Roger... We usually don't have other speakers for any of our convention. Also it mentions about music therapy and differnt troupes performing. It is unheard off in the Church.
Also, i have a concern on the article about Churches designed by Pastor AC Thomas. Is this AC Thomas one of our Cheif pastors?RS CA 06:53, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
Rencin, I attend the church in San Fransisco. I don't want to publish my name here. I will send you an email to your gmail account. God bless!
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia! You recently added an external link to Blogspot in an article. It has been removed because the link pointed to a non-encyclopedic source. Please refer to Wikipedia's policy on external links for more information. |
Hey Rencin, if you work long enough and hard enough around here, people will start acknowledging that sooner or later :) By the way, I removed the administrator template from your userpage. It's not really correct to tell people you're an admin when you're not, because it's misleading. Thanks, and take care. riana_dzasta 07:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
Hey this page looks like it does not need a db tag please remove it. This is still yet to thought of and yet to be subbmitted.thanks.Rencin Matthew
I think this australian based person can be edited by you more than me. I hope you do something about this too. Nick Vujicic Thanks. rencin24
Hey all, Its really a great joy for me to be a part of you all and to work with you all. Well I really do not know what to say. I was almost in tears when I got to know this. A big thanks to all of my friends. I am gonna miss you. I really hope you go and see.rencin24
I echo the sentiments CattleGirl earlier expressed. I feel humbled and sad by my mention on your userpage. The departure of good wikipedians is something I really feel sad about. Remember, no one can actually leave wikipedia, 'coz once you are in it, you are a part of it. All the best with your work. Do drop in whenever you have time. Regards,--thunderboltz(Deepu) 16:01, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I came here from the article on Nick Vujicic. The talk page as you created it from scratch, is entirely full of templates which serve only to hide any current discussion - ie you can't see if anything's going on without going to the talk page and scrolling down...
I think it is probably best to leave the archive template off a talk page until someone needs to archive it! Any editor who knows enough to archive a talk page will make sure a link to the archive ends up on the talk page.
Also: Signs of the Times article states the guy lives in Brisbane - why did you mark it as project Sydney? (just curious on the last one... )Garrie 00:43, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:TPMlogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 05:22, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Hey Cattlegirl am back yep u helped me a lot on many tough situations and you also spoke words of proper understanding when I said am gonna leave wikipeida but thanks to you those words kept me still going now am back....to WIKIPEDIA. I love it. rencin24 19:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC) rencin24
The Christianity WikiProject Newsletter | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A tag has been placed on Karuna Davis, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Lyndal.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 18:56, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi Rencin,
Thanks for the note. I was pretty sure that it wasn't you that left the message, but I feel better knowing for sure that it wasn't. I think I'm going to archive that current talk page and keep a closer watch on it. It's tough to justify removing new off topic conversation when there's a few other sections that aren't directly related to improving the article. Welcome back if you're back. Come back soon if you'd just stopped in to check on things. --Onorem♠Dil 13:30, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
I have nominated New Hope TV, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Hope TV. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? ChiragPatnaik (talk) 06:33, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading Image:Vfs.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:21, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Onfire.1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — ξxplicit 03:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Lyndal.gif. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.
If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.
If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The-Pope (talk) 15:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Rencin24,
The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011. But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach. As you are part of WikiProject India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions. We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011 |
---|
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Bookofdaniel.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:47, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pramodbhasin.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Brooke Fraser .jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:48, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TPMlogo.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
Thank you for uploading File:Pastordon.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:49, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Pastordon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 00:50, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malavika Mohanan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Malavika Mohanan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 10:05, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:10, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Rencin24. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Urban India Ministries, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 12:35, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
Namaskaram, Rencin24. We would like to inform you about the recent changes to the WikiProject. As you may know, Wikiproject Kerala hasn't a newsletter yet. A newsletter is always help to inform recent changes in the project to project members and help for effective coordination. Now we have launched a new newsletter for the Wikiproject. As a member, you are cordially invited to subscribe to the newsletter. Also do not forget to contribute to the newsletter. Thank you!
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:43, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of chief pastors of the Pentecostal Mission until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.StreetcarEnjoyer (talk) 23:33, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
You can add your suggestions for open tasks here Articles to be improved
|
These are some of the events in Kerala in the month of July
|
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:36, 19 July 2024 (UTC)