User talk:Xx78900

Archives

Archive 1

Xx78900 (talk) 22:15, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
10		Mór Ní Tuathail (talk)	Add sources
14		Blackville–Hilda High School shooting (talk)	Add sources
439		Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church (talk)	Add sources
323		Lordship of Ireland (talk)	Add sources
6		River Derry (talk)	Add sources
474		County Tipperary (talk)	Add sources
25		St. Catherine High School (talk)	Cleanup
315		Quality-adjusted life year (talk)	Cleanup
3,449		Irish Republican Army (talk)	Cleanup
6		1540 in Ireland (talk)	Expand
24		Mary O'Rourke (talk)	Expand
141		Future generations (talk)	Expand
20		Bishopstown (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
480		Brian Boru (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
258		Richard de Clare, 2nd Earl of Pembroke (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
417		Objectivity (philosophy) (talk)	Merge
125		Abahlali baseMjondolo (talk)	Merge
43		FIFA World Cup on ABC (talk)	Merge
70		Rathfarnham (talk)	Wikify
4		Killeshin Church (talk)	Wikify
81		Montpelier Hill (talk)	Wikify
3		Colin Wringe (talk)	Orphan
3		Coolamber Hall House (talk)	Orphan
7		Jim Greenbaum (talk)	Orphan
11		Red Abbey, Cork (talk)	Stub
3		Ailill mac Fáeláin (talk)	Stub
4		Loreto College, Swords (talk)	Stub
6		1539 in Ireland (talk)	Stub
7		Buriana (talk)	Stub
4		1538 in Ireland (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 22:19, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know, as you’ve made note of in your latest response, you’re running up against a brick wall at Pedagogy of the Oppressed.

I’m not sure if it’s a conscious decision by that editor or it’s something they cannot help, but they generally refuse to see others’ points/are unfazed by policy (see this wall of words, for example: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Breakthrough_Institute#Promotional_Page).

Just wanted to leave this note and save you some time. —Hobomok (talk) 15:05, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this, it's probably better for my blood pressure that I leave it alone! Xx78900 (talk) 16:02, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cork Courthouse, Anglesea Street you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 00:21, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have found a few issues in my Review. As soon as you adjust or correct them, I'll then re-assess. Looking pretty good though... Shearonink (talk) 17:04, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burke family (Castlebar) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burke family (Castlebar) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Slatersteven (talk) 14:06, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cork Courthouse, Anglesea Street you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Cork Courthouse, Anglesea Street for comments about the article, and Talk:Cork Courthouse, Anglesea Street/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Shearonink -- Shearonink (talk) 23:22, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cork Courthouse, Washington Street you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 11:40, 21 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Cork Courthouse, Washington Street you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cork Courthouse, Washington Street for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Unexpectedlydian -- Unexpectedlydian (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Irish culture

Thank you for quality articles about Irish topics such as Murder of Cameron Blair, Timoleague Friary, Legal career of Mary Robinson and Cork Courthouse, Anglesea Street, for your support on James Joyce, for your project to cover Anglican churches, including images you take, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

You are recipient no. 2807 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 23:16, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, comrade! In this MFD you said that the only userbox about radical feminism you have found was that one being nominated for deletion. So may I suggest you to take a look at this UBX: User:Arado Ar 196/Userbox/Radfem-good? It contains no controversional content, so is unlikely to be MFD-ed. a!rado🦈 (C✙T) 09:52, 16 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, thanks for the message. I've since removed all infoboxes from my profile, as I don't like the idea that I might be showing support for something without realizing it. I still identify as a radical feminist, in that I think porn as it exists today and sex work generally is ultimately harmful for women generally, but at the point where I displayed the infobox I wasn't aware of the transphobic connotations of radical feminism, so I certainly wouldn't advertise myself as a radfem for fear of being misunderstood. I appreciate you reaching out to me though. Xx78900 (talk) 10:32, 18 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xx78900. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Enoch Burke, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive
August 2023 Backlog Drive: On 1 August, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. (t · c) buidhe 05:15, 30 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive
March 2024 Backlog Drive: On 1 March, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here or ask questions here.
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year.

(t · c) buidhe 02:40, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop taking down the reference to the Harvard Crimson article. It simply describes a review. In the context of Ireland there is nothing wrong with being described as Anti-English/Anglophobic. Most Irish people I venture would be proud to describe themselves as such - I certainly don’t think The Mary Wallopers themselves would object. It’s probably something the band themselves would be surprised has caused such a fuss on here. It should stay. 2A00:23C6:7682:F101:6D75:2B72:EAA7:8362 (talk) 20:13, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop including it - The Harvard Crimson is a student magazine, and you're quoting an opinion piece. Opinion pieces have value, and perhaps if the author was a recognised figure in music commentary it would merit inclusion. But even then, it would depend on how it's presented.

There's a reason that we don't include such descriptions as "Irish Rock N Roll is an essential step-up for one of the most defiant yet inherently honest forces in modern Irish music" which is from this article in HotPress Magazine.

This is in spite of the fact that HotPress Magazine is more relevant that the Harvard Crimson in this matter. The issue is that neither source are suitably encyclopaedic in nature. Indeed, the article you persistently link to doesn't even discuss the point in detail, it just make passing reference to Anglophobia in the title.

Some guy calling their music Anglophobic does not make it so, and until there exists a reliable source which describes it as such, ideally in some detail, it should not be included.

EDIT: Also I would just like to add that as an Irish person, I would be ashamed to describe either myself or anyone that I am close to as Anglophobic. Hate has no place in a progressive world. Irish people may resent the role England played in the history of Ireland, but hatred of the English themselves, today, is neither common nor acceptable. Xx78900 (talk) 23:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[cross posted] You’re jumping to the conclusion that Anglophobia equals “hate”. It is incontrovertible that, for wholly understandable historical and geopolitical reasons, there is a general aversion, hostility, or disdain for England and English people in Ireland. That does not mean that anyone is accusing anyone else of hate speech (or music for that matter). 2A00:23C6:7682:F101:B9BC:7F47:C3CA:6F67 (talk) 08:41, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Djong (ship) has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you.

Talk:Djong (ship) on a "History and geography" request for comment-- your comment would be greatly appreciated Merzostin (talk) 14:52, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]