User talk:Xx78900/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Xx78900. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello, Xx78900! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:37, 23 March 2017 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi, Xx, if you will allow the informality. I'll respond to your actual note on the article talk page, but I wanted to let you know that if you wish to alert an editor that they're being name-checked on a talk page (not their own, of course), you should use the {{ping}} template, like this: {{ping|Phil wink}}. The editor will then be notified that someone is referencing them, or addressing them, in a discussion. Also, remember to sign your talk page posts with 4 tildes (~~~~). Cheers. Phil wink (talk) 20:07, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Phil, thanks for the tip! I'm relatively new to Wikipedia in that this is my first attempt at doing anything anyway substantial, so am not quite familiar with the correct modes of communication yet, so thanks for the tip! I'll use {{ping}} in future. Just out of interest, what is the difference between the two? Thanks. Xx78900 (talk) 22:49, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

No prob. Not sure which two you're talking about... if you mean the 2 examples I gave above, then the first (that starts with "{{tl|" in the source, and which you reproduced in your response) is just a convenient way to link to the template in text without actually using the template. The second (which uses "code" and "nowiki" markup in angle brackets) is a way to show the full literal text that I wanted to convey to you in the displayed text, again without actually invoking the template... that is, I'm typing out the full text necessary to use the template, but then telling Wikipedia only to display it, not to actually perform it. On the other hand, if you're talking about the link you originally used, versus the example I gave above, then the difference is that the link you used was just that: a link to my user page. Whereas the "ping" template will actually give me a little alert, letting me know that someone is talking about, or to, me (the "ping" template also does provide a link to my user page, but that's just sort of a secondary extra). Now, you certainly don't have to use this, particularly if you have reason to believe that the editor you want to alert is already watching the page, and you certainly wouldn't use it on the editor's own personal talk page because, well, obviously that message is for them, that's why you put it there. But I find it very useful if, for example, I'd like to bring someone new into a conversation.

Yeah, I could see you were new because I checked out your stats -- doesn't always mean a lot, but it can give you an idea of who you're dealing with before you type. If you have questions or encounter problems here, I'm happy to try to address them. I'm now editing somewhat sporadically, but if you ping me or edit my talk page, I'll notice. The number of subtle expectations that you're supposed to comply with here would ... well, they would fill Wikipedia. And, by and large, most of them are at least somewhat sensible. But being new, you're going to make mistakes -- if you don't, you're not trying hard enough. Some of us you'll run into will be turd sandwiches, but I think the majority are still just righteous nerds trying to share knowledge; I'm somewhere in the middle. So I hope you enjoy your time here.

And a couple of observations on board games: I really hope you have the energy to keep at it, because Wikipedia coverage of, well especially traditional board games, is tiny islands of excellence in vast oceans of ... not-excellence. But let me express my prejudices as a cynical old Wikipedian, looking at your latest edits. My first concern is for balance: it would actually be better (in my opinion) to have no section on European history at all, than to have one that implies that the history of board games in Europe is Hnefatafl, Ficheall, and Kriegsspiel -- that's just too weirdly random. Now, this is not at all a fair criticism of your work, because you're not done yet, and you've very clearly conveyed this by placing that template in the section. But this is still what's in my mind: is this editor really going to fill this out sensibly, or will we be left with yet another random list? Secondly, I'm rather surprised by the early dates you've referenced, so (if I'm being responsible) I'll probably have to double-check those sources to see if they're any good, and if they really claim that. (And if a claim for a date is probably wrong, as I'm assuming is implied by "anachronism", then why are we reporting it? In an already-detailed treatment of Ficheall that includes sound dates by contrast, sure ... in an overview of board games in general? no way!). Please understand, my goal is not to discourage you; quite the opposite. But I do want you to get a sense of some of the types of expectations that your new collaborators may have. Cheers. Phil wink (talk) 03:59, 6 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi Xx78900! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Trying to understand whether or not it's okay to use a company logo or not, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stonewell Cider and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stonewell Cider, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Xx78900! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Many provided references don't establish notability (interviews, links to mentions or tracklists, etc)

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Skinshape and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Skinshape, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 21:35, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

Stonewell Cider, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

bonadea contributions talk 06:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Xx78900,

Thank you for creating Cork Courthouse, Anglesea Street.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

More information is needed to show how this court - courthouse is notable, thank you.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 11:58, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:Cork Courthouse Washington Street 1899 Ordnance Survey.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:45, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
13		Kanken Tōyama (talk)	Add sources
2		William Maziere Brady (talk)	Add sources
3		Buttevant Franciscan Friary (talk)	Add sources
15		Roman Catholic Diocese of Cloyne (talk)	Add sources
7		River Bride (talk)	Add sources
9		St Colman's College, Fermoy (talk)	Add sources
6		History of Durrus and District (talk)	Cleanup
5		Canovee (talk)	Cleanup
59		Breaking (martial arts) (talk)	Cleanup
17		Abe Isoo (talk)	Expand
19		Uí Fidgenti (talk)	Expand
18		Cork, Bandon and South Coast Railway (talk)	Expand
12		St Mary's Collegiate Church, Youghal (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
46		Chitō-ryū (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
17		National Maritime College of Ireland (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
12		Network sovereignty (talk)	Merge
6		Metroplaza Towers (talk)	Merge
28		Martinus Nijhoff Publishers (talk)	Merge
6		Bishop of Kilfenora (talk)	Wikify
39		Cormac mac Cuilennáin (talk)	Wikify
3		William Morton (priest) (talk)	Wikify
4		Isen Mulang Palace (talk)	Orphan
4		Andrea Marinelli (talk)	Orphan
8		Bray boxing club shooting (talk)	Orphan
8		Bishop of Cork, Cloyne and Ross (talk)	Stub
3		George Chinnery (bishop) (talk)	Stub
5		George Synge (talk)	Stub
4		Charles Crow (talk)	Stub
180		Semantic Scholar (talk)	Stub
5		Robert Johnson (bishop) (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:53, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Hi, great to see another editor with an interest in Cork. I thought Ceoil and I were the only ones! The Church of St Peter could really do with a better image if you ever find yourself in that direction. All the best. KJP1 (talk) 17:23, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello there @KJP1:. As it happens, I live quite nearby! The weather isn't great for the next week, but as soon as it clears up I'll take a few photos. Nice to meet you :) Xx78900 (talk) 20:08, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

That would be fantastic! Burges’s Cork endeavours are his only major works that I’ve never seen. And you have all three on your doorstep. I really must make a trip. Until then, some nice photos of St Peter’s will suffice! KJP1 (talk) 20:37, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

I snapped a few shots today, which I've added to the WikiData entry, see what you make of them! All the best, Xx78900 (talk) 12:11, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

Fantastic! What a great building it is, and the images show this off very well. I am super jealous that I’ve not yet been able to see if myself. Can you get inside? KJP1 (talk) 15:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

I should be able to in due course, but the small slip of paper visible on the door says that the tower is undergoing restoration at present, and the church will be closed until they complete restorative works. They didn't indicate when they might be finished, but that they began in mid September. I'll shoot the interior when it does reopen. Xx78900 (talk) 16:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

That would be excellent. I really must do a bit more work on this article. To start, it must be mentioned in the Cork Pevsner, so I should certainly add that. Many thanks again. KJP1 (talk) 17:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, are you still interested in the peer review for Cork Courthouse, Washington Street? I can leave some feedback if you want. Zetana (talk) 05:06, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Zetana:, I’d appreciate that, thank you! Xx78900 (talk) 06:15, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

I'll take a look tomorrow! Zetana (talk) 07:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

I'll take a look tomorrow (again), apologies, a bit busy today. Zetana (talk) 06:55, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

That’s no problem there’s no rush! Xx78900 (talk) 07:39, 24 October 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Murder of Cameron Blair you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 05:21, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

The article Murder of Cameron Blair you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Murder of Cameron Blair for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 21:41, 27 October 2021 (UTC)

The article Murder of Cameron Blair you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Murder of Cameron Blair for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of GhostRiver -- GhostRiver (talk) 18:01, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Killing of Fabiole Camara De Campos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Killing of Fabiole Camara De Campos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WWGB (talk) 03:11, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Anne Colomines is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Anne Colomines until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WWGB (talk) 05:38, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Murder of Nadine Lott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murder of Nadine Lott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

WWGB (talk) 05:39, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Timoleague Friary you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceoil -- Ceoil (talk) 03:00, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article 2021 Munster abuse case you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 22:01, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

The article Timoleague Friary you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Timoleague Friary for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ceoil -- Ceoil (talk) 23:41, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 08:51, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

The article 2021 Munster abuse case you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:2021 Munster abuse case for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jens Lallensack -- Jens Lallensack (talk) 19:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Hiya. According to the about page on the Dúchas Schools' Collection (and the related about page on the National Folklore Collection), the collection includes several hundred thousand pages of primary school pupils' original exercise books, compiled from 5,000 Irish primary schools between 1937 and 1939. A (granted nicely bound and well presented and centralised) kids school project. While perhaps their teachers reviewed the homework/submissions, I'm not sure work by primary school kids meets the editorial or review levels expected to meet WP:RS. Certainly I'd be intrigued to know, in 90 years, if someone was using my homework as an encyclopedic reference. As we have here.... Guliolopez (talk) 13:23, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Xx78900

Thank you for creating Cork Savings Bank.

User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:09, 11 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Abbey, Cork, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Augustinian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 29 July 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Legal career of Mary Robinson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

The article Legal career of Mary Robinson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Legal career of Mary Robinson for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 23:02, 6 August 2022 (UTC)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Seanad Éireann career of Mary Robinson you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 20:21, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

The article Seanad Éireann career of Mary Robinson you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Seanad Éireann career of Mary Robinson for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 18:02, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

The article Legal career of Mary Robinson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Legal career of Mary Robinson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sammi Brie -- Sammi Brie (talk) 22:22, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

The article Seanad Éireann career of Mary Robinson you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Seanad Éireann career of Mary Robinson for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Amitchell125 -- Amitchell125 (talk) 21:42, 17 August 2022 (UTC)

Morning. Hope Dublin and pre x-mass exams are not stressing you too much. If you get a chance, can you take a look at Corp Naomh...hoping to have this at FAC late nov, and given you have an interest in archeology, your feedback would be great. Its my 3rd early medieval Irish object to take there, goal is to build confidence for eventually working tara brooch up to snuff. Would be great to have a fellow county cork boieee in tow, or even as a collab like. Warning though, I work slowly these days; not so much anymore stone mad for spheed.[1] Ceoil (talk) 09:06, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi @Ceoil - my apologies for dropping off the face of the earth, I was under a load of pressure for a while there, and I couldn't even think about editing. Got a lot done though and I'm back now, so I'll have a look, absolutely! Xx78900 (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2022 (UTC)

No problems, worries or rush, though I have to say I'm looking forward to someday seeing Timoleague Friary at FAC. Ceoil (talk) 20:52, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

Hi Xx78900, I hope you're doing well. Due to your inactivity, I am taking over your GA review of Political ideologies in the United States. Please note you are still welcome to contribute to the review. ––FormalDude (talk) 07:49, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

@FormalDude Thank you for doing so - I dropped off the face of the earth for a while there, but I'm back now. Didn't mean to disappear mid-review, but it just happened that way. Delighted you took over as it was a great article and I had been reviewing it extensively. Gonna send BigUglyAlien an apology now too. Xx78900 (talk) 15:06, 9 November 2022 (UTC)