Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claim-Jumper: The Game

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 13:06, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Claim-Jumper: The Game (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One shortish review in a niche magazine which reviewed apparently everything remotely connected to RPGs, and the website of the company behind this game. And that's it. Looking for the article title only gives 5 results, as this doesn't seem to be the actual name of the game: 4 hits are enwiki or mirrors, and one is unrelated[1]. Broadening the search a bit gives 75 hits[2], but the vast majority are again not about this game, and the others don't give any additional notability. No obvious redirect target, so deletion it is. Fram (talk) 10:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 10:08, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - There is only one secondary source and one primary source being used, which is insufficient to pass the WP:GNG. Searching for sources only bring up a handful of results, which all appear to simply be mirrors of this article. Rorshacma (talk) 16:52, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Lacks sufficient RS to pass the GNG. Chetsford (talk) 02:26, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.