- Fernando Fonseca (footballer, born 1993) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to locate significant coverage of this individual. Searching turns up stats farms and namesakes, without any detailed information from independent sources. C679 08:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Brazil. C679 08:43, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. C679 08:44, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep – Per WP:HEY. I added sources that demonstrate WP:SIGCOV, the player has relevant spells with several intermediate Brazilian football clubs such as Joinville EC, SER Caxias and Ypiranga FC. Svartner (talk) 14:11, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – Despite recent expansion by Svartner, in my view, most of the additional sources are transfer reports and contract renewal. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 14:48, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I added more recent transfer sources, but most of them provide a summary of the player's career in addition to all the relevant information to establish WP:GNG. I don't see any gaps missing. Svartner (talk) 14:59, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Svartner and AGF for notability. GiantSnowman 20:59, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I am withdrawing this nomination per the good sources found and added by User:Svartner. @Clariniie: Could you take a further look due to the different state of the article now? 08:50, 6 February 2025 (UTC)C679[reply]
- Regardless of whether those describe the person's career or not, transfer sources are considered routine coverage. Social media ones are user-generated and should never be used on Wikipedia. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 11:18, 6 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- They are not user-generated. There is a very limited number of people who have access to a club's Instagram profile. However, they are primary sources and do not contribute to notability. Furthermore, some "transfer sources" are in-depth and some (many) are not, no blanket statement can be made about transfer news - e.g. some sources use the transfer news opportunity to go into detail about the player's career, abilities, personality etc. At this point, anyway, the AFD can be closed in 20 hours after the normal elapsed time. Geschichte (talk) 11:10, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- I kinda agree if secondary routine announcements go in-depth about the person's career! This is such a thing that comes to my mind. ⋆。˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚。⋆ 10:08, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Per above. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 18:15, 10 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. 1. Soccerway: stats
N. 2. GloboEsport 1: passing mention
N. 3. Futebol Interior: routine transfer announcement nearly identical to the club's press release
N. 4. GE 2: routine transfer announcement also derived from PR
N. 5. Press release from 3,
N. 6. Marcou no esporte: reprint of press release,
N. 7. GZH: routine interview, little secondary coverage
N. 8. GZH: transfer announcement, slightly more material than usual but all of it is shallow stats, not secondary analysis
N. JoelleJay (talk) 00:08, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- The 8. source provides in-depth coverage of the player's entire career. The others complement practically all other remaining information. Excluding information that goes beyond the player's sporting career, there is nothing missing. Svartner (talk) 03:57, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment – More complementary sources [1], [2], [3], [4]. Svartner (talk) 04:37, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- None of these sources provide any coverage of him beyond listing which teams he played for and other trivial info from press releases (and the last one is a football club). That is all info we could get from looking at his stats page, thus routine and primary. JoelleJay (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NiftyyyNofteeeee (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]