Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/log/April 2019

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was kept by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 22:30:03 28 April 2019 (UTC) [1].

Notified: Frickative, CycloneGu, Glee task force

At over 115KB in size, this article satisfies the criteria of a Featured Article rather than a Featured List. I was puzzled why this was considered to be a "List" in the first place. The content appears to be in good shape, so I'm primarily concern with its status as a Featured "List". Looking forward to comments on this issue, HĐ (talk) 07:21, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This could easily be a FA, but it meets all the criteria for a FL. More than 50 % of the article are lists. There is no reason to delist.--Lirim | Talk 19:39, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep can't see any issues here. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:52, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Close without FLRC On second thoughts this qualifies as a list more than an article. The quality still satisfies the criteria of a Featured List. I hope moderators can close this without removal of Featured status. Thanks, HĐ (talk) 01:30, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been kept, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:30, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 22:20:03 28 April 2019 (UTC) [2].

Notified: Nishkid64, WikiProject Africa

I am nominating this for featured list removal because it fails criteria 2 of the criteria and has not been updated at the same level of previous entries. Tropicanan (talk) 11:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tropicanan: you left the "notifications" section with the examples - did you notify anyone/should I? --DannyS712 (talk) 22:21, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Tropicanan (talk) 11:51, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist – clearly no longer an FL. It was promoted in 2008 and it shows. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 23:09, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep - It may need a copy-edit here and there, but overall, it looks good to me. It doesn't matter what year it was promoted.--Cheetah (talk) 06:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist whoa, almost the entire lead is completely unsourced, this would take quite a bit of effort to bring up to featured standard. Mattximus (talk) 13:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Clear delist referencing and WP:ACCESS problems are obvious at even the quickest of glances. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:50, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:20, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was removed by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 22:25:11 28 April 2019 (UTC) [3].

Notified: Vensatry, Crzycheetah, Dwaipayanc, WikiProject India

A lot has changed since the FL check in 2012. Entire key table has been removed which was better formatted. Nagpur is entirely missing from the article. Until recently Naya Raipur was being listed as the capital of Chhattisgarh (till I fixed it to Raipur). The notes have all been altered completely. Also, significant developments have happened since then: creation of the new state Telangana; new capitals Naya Raipur, Amravati, Dharamshala.

Keeping all of this in view, the list definitely needs a review on its FL status. Gotitbro (talk) 15:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delist This list is a mess. The lead has only two references and is to short. How Gotitbro already said, the list is outdated.—21:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
• Delist In it's present state, it is a mess. There is a note from the table in the lead for some reason? The dates are a bit strange, because for example, it lists the former capital of Assam to be before the state of Assam was created. If it's a capital of a country before India, then wouldn't it be consistent to do this to other states? Very messy. Mattximus (talk) 23:00, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delist the lead is very weak but the rest of the article appears to be just about satisfactory. The Rambling Man (talk) 09:51, 5 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delist – Lead is too short and it has almost no references to back anything up. – BeatlesLedTV (talk) 21:43, 14 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.