Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 19

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:04, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Amamayong → Sigbin  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This mythical creature seems to have a lot of names, but this one fails to appear at target article. I also can't find a reliable source that provides any evidence of its usage. CycloneYoris ^talk! 23:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I was pinged here. I created the redirect 11 years ago. I don't remember creating it, but the name Amamayong did appear at this article at the time. No doubt that's why I made the redirect. See revision history: [1]. By all means though delete the redirect if a reliable source can't be found. Damien Linnane (talk) 00:59, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes that was tagged with citation needed at that time. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:08, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was procedural close, as redirect has been converted to an article. I'll move it to the proper capitalization. N.b., if the BLAR edit-warring was recent, such a close would not be appropriate. --BDD (talk) 15:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Mandatory Offer → Takeover#Mechanics  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. However, this redirect is a {{R with history}} that was seemingly WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT-ed in 2009, was restored by the article creator in 2013, then was re-WP:BLANKANDREDIRECT-ed a few hours later by the same editor. who performed the 2009 redirection. Steel1943 (talk) 22:11, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore and move to mandatory offer I've started expanding the article that was previously in the history. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 00:29, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Ottomar Rodolphe Vlad Dracula Prince Kretzulesco. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:34, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Kretzulesco → Dracula  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. However, this redirect is a {{R with history}} that was redirected almost 13 years ago. Steel1943 (talk) 21:14, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment the page history suggests that the article was originally about the daughter of Catherine Caradja (as she died in 1997, Catherine in 1993), but subsequent edits introduced a mix-up over who adopted Ottomar Rodolphe Vlad Dracula Prince Kretzulesco. It is most likely that anyone redirected from Kretzulesco would be have been looking for someone of this family rather than Dracula. EdwardUK (talk) 23:18, 3 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Ottomar Rodolphe Vlad Dracula Prince Kretzulesco as an {{R from surname}}. Not a very active user (talk) 10:11, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The term is ambiguous and Search yields better results. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:20, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Ottomar Rodolphe Vlad Dracula Prince Kretzulesco per Not a very active user. The only other use I could find was a fictional character from The Wonderful 101. --BDD (talk) 18:25, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget and tag per above. Standard, when we have only one article on a person with a particular surname, see the {{R from surname}} documentation. Narky Blert (talk) 20:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Noting that this is also a plausible misspelling and possibly also an other-language variant of Crețulescu. – Uanfala (talk) 23:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  I can't find any evidence in German, Romanian or Russian WPs that Kretzulesco is a variant spelling of Kretzulescu. The only Kretzulesco in Romanian WP is ro:Ottomar Rodolphe Vlad Dracula Prince Kretzulesco. Nevertheless, a redirect hatnote/see also as appropriate would certainly be a good idea. Narky Blert (talk) 03:05, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  The lead of Crețulescu was misleading, and it lacked the surname categories. I've edited it. Narky Blert (talk) 03:05, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Ottomar Rodolphe Vlad Dracula Prince Kretzulesco and tag with {{R from surname}} per Not a very active user. CaptainGalaxy 12:07, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Phillip Ansel Roll → Hugo Butler  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target, delete unless a justification can be provided _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:22, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I think this exists because Phillip Ansel Roll (or Phillip Ansell Roll) worked on Robinson Crusoe (1954 film) with Hugo Butler, but he's not mentioned in that article, or anywhere else in Enwiki. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:47, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move disambiguation page to base name (this should have been a move request). -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• STFU → Southern Tenant Farmers Union  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Google search points to Shut the fuck up and the Rina Sawayama song titled "STFU!". Backed by pageviews, I suspect that one of these is the primary topic, or that there is no primary topic. Either way, this organization definitely isn't. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 16:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Move STFU (disambiguation) to STFU since the nominator isn't clear what is the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for "STFU", and neither am I. Steel1943 (talk) 16:17, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Move STFU (disambiguation) to STFU as per Steel1943.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. STFU also means "Southern Tenant Farmers Union", and that is the main abbreviation. But there are other STFU thingys, so no need to move anything from now. Seventyfiveyears at 17:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Also"? Southern Tenant Farmers Union is the current target. "But there are other STFU thingys...": Yep, and they are all listed at STFU (disambiguation). So, what evidence do you have that Southern Tenant Farmers Union is the primary meaning for "STFU"? Steel1943 (talk) 17:18, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Move - STFU (disambiguation) to STFU unless something is definitely shown as the primary topic. --Jax 0677 (talk) 17:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• WP:ROBIN swap STFU and STFU (disambiguation) to put the DAB page at the basename (which comes to the same thing as the moves already !voted for but retains all history). IMO Southern Tenant Farmers Union (who?) is definitely not a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT target. Narky Blert (talk) 19:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - I am open to a round robin swap. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Oh wow, I just noticed this redirect had a prior RfD: Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2015 June 12#STFU. @BDD: As the editor who basically stated the rationale that resulted in the redirect being "kept" since most other participants cited it for their rationale, do you have any thoughts on this and/or has anything changed in the last five years? (STFU (disambiguation) was created a few months ago, so there may be something new.) Steel1943 (talk) 23:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply - STFU! was released in 2019 after the RfD was completed. --Jax 0677 (talk) 23:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I think things have changed in the emergence of new topics and the creation of the disambiguation page. --BDD (talk) 15:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate: We do not have a primary topic for this title. So it would be best to delete this redirect and move the disambiguation page to the primary title. Aasim 17:48, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Move STFU (disambiguation) to STFU because there is no primary topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:24, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • ... and at the same time, retarget Stfu, S.T.F.U., S.t.f.u., S.T.F.U, S.t.f.u to the disambiguation page. (I have started a separate RfD for SDFU and Sdfu). Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Origins of the Hermit Brothers of the Order of Saint Augustine and Their True Establishment Before the Great Lateran Council → Origins of the Hermit Friars of the Order of Saint Augustine and Their True Establishment Before the Great Lateran Council  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The main article was renamed, however it was wrongly renamed to this, it has subsequently been renamed again. Hence this redirect is wrongly named + is not required. Devokewater (talk) 15:18, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak keep. It's a translation of the subject's main non-English title, and I could see how a foreign-language word could be translated as "friars" and "brothers" since in context, they are synonyms. Steel1943 (talk) 16:14, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Hi Steel1943 (talk) there are two directs a wrong one (i.e. this one) + a correct one. Regards --Devokewater (talk) 18:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @Devokewater: I don't think having the following information will change my opinion on the nominated redirect, but I'll ask anyways: What is the "correct" one? Steel1943 (talk) 19:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  @Steel1943: see Talk:Origins of the Hermit Friars of the Order of Saint Augustine and Their True Establishment Before the Great Lateran Council Devokewater (talk) 20:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  I assume you are referring to Talk:Origins of the Hermit Friars of the Order of Saint Augustine and Their True Establishment Before the Great Lateran Council#Redirects. The redirects mentioned there are the nominated one, and a version of the nominated redirect's target using "St." instead of "Saint" and "His" instead of "Their". Yep, my opinion remains unchanged on this nominated redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 20:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• (edit conflict) Keep per K4 and Steel. There's no harm in slightly-off-the-mark redirects, as long as they are unambiguous (as this one surely is). This redirect is starting to get pageviews from old links that best not be broken. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 19:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. So far as I can tell, both titles are unofficial translations of the 17th Century Spanish, and therefore equally right or equally wrong (as WP:OR). Narky Blert (talk) 20:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Rooves → Roof  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

This redirect is innacurrate and implausible. Seventyfiveyears at 15:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Per [2], "Rooves" is plural for "roof". --Jax 0677 (talk) 15:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per wikt:rooves and all of this. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 19:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per above. Perfectly good spelling, compare hoof and poof#Etymology 2. Narky Blert (talk) 20:06, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  My mistake, | for : so it should be wikt:poof#Etymology 2. Thanks to Jax 0677 for spotting that. Narky Blert (talk) 18:49, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, but contrary to other editors the plural of "roof" is "roofs", with "rooves" being variously described as secondary, archaic or incorrect. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:48, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:10, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Sketch (comics) → List of Marvel Comics characters: S#Sketch  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Delete. "Sketch" is no longer included in this list and the redirect serves no purpose. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 15:02, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - The redirect has some history, but it would likely have gone to AFD and been deleted. WP:ATD-R still requires a suitable page to redirect to, and given that the edit summary when removed from the list is pretty convincing, this seems like a pseudo-WP:G8. -2pou (talk) 17:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• WInds. → Wind  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• WInds → Wind  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Winds. → Wind  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Between the misuse of capitalization of the letter "I" and the use of a full stop (period) after some of these redirects, I don't see how any are useful and seem to visualize the premise behind the "WP:COSTLY" side of the "WP:CHEAP vs WP:COSTLY" argument. Steel1943 (talk) 05:35, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Implausible search terms. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Definitely delete the ones with periods, since that's unnecessary punctuation and Winds already takes care of that. Weak delete WInds, which might result from someone holding the ⇧ Shift key for too long, but the consensus for those sorts of redirects seems to be for them to go. Regards, SONIC678 14:44, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 16:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: We do not need to create redirects for every single misspelling of "Wind" or "Winds". Aasim 00:26, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Malformed and slightly ambiguous, my first thought with hearing "winds" is the woodwinds section of an orchestra. Hog Farm _Bacon 02:28, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete all these errors since the correct version winds exists. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 20:50, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom like the Cl0ck to Clock example. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:24, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, doesn't clutter the search function, useless to nominate, occasionally helpful, etc. — J947 ‡ ^{message ⁓ edits} 01:57, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Skian → Knife  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. The redirect is currently tagged with {{R from alternative language}}, which hints a WP:FORRED issue. However, results on third party engines hint the word, in another language, represents a part of a wing of an animal? Steel1943 (talk) 05:24, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:RFFL. It's an anglicised spelling of Scottish Gaelic "sgian", as in sgian-dubh. According to Wiktionary, "skian" is Manx language for "wing" - wikt:skian. Narky Blert (talk) 05:56, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Given Narky Blert's findings, neither knife nor wing makes for a valid target, per WP:FORRED and WP:XY. Fälö by#Other islands briefly mentions an uninhabited islet by this name, but I can't find any source verifying its existence so I'm reluctant to endorse retargeting there either. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 06:07, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • I have no opinion on the RfD, but I don't think WP:XY means what you think it means. jnestorius^(talk) 08:40, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Shrug see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 July 30#Sachimo for some discussion on that point. The claim that WP:XY can only apply to redirects in the form "X and Y" was added just a few months ago. However, as Uanfala stated at the RfC on the talk page a couple of days after that update: I don't see a need to specifically single out one very specific type of ambiguous redirect (of the form X + conjunction + Y) and have a separate rule for that: the underlying logic applies to all ambiguous redirects.. Given that the change to XY doesn't appear to reflect any strong consensus, I'll keep using what it meant before. 59.149.124.29 (talk) 09:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Cable sheath splitting knife → Knife  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

No such WP:PRECISE subject mentioned in the target article. Readers will not find what they are looking for if they search this redirect since the target article seems absent of such information. Steel1943 (talk) 05:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as unnecessary and misleading. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:26, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Enwiki has nothing specific about this topic. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Long-blade knife → Blade  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

It's no clear if the best target for this redirect is its current target or Knife. Neither option seems to have sufficient information to identify the subject of this redirect, so it may be better to delete this redirect so that the search function can better serve our readers find what they are looking for. Steel1943 (talk) 05:18, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:XY and as ambiguous. How long is a piece of blade? Narky Blert (talk) 06:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Knife. Knife blades are long, but not too long. Seventyfiveyears at 17:57, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Knife blades are long, but not too long." I don't understand how that is relevant in the least to determining a target. Either way, the concept of "long-blade" or "long blade" isn't described there either. Retargeting to Knife seems equally as unhelpful per my nomination statement.Steel1943 (talk) 19:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This redirect is ambiguous and may cause confusion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Bot Science → Robot  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

The term is not exclusive to its target. The redirect could refer to the science of multiple subjects located at the disambiguation page Bot. Steel1943 (talk) 05:15, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete -- JHunterJ (talk) 11:58, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• F R A N K → Frank  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Implausible due to the spaces and since no subjects on the target on the target page are acronyms with spaces. Steel1943 (talk) 05:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Implausible search term. Narky Blert (talk) 06:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom --Devokewater (talk) 13:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. --BDD (talk) 19:57, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• F (Los Angeles Metro) → G Line (Los Angeles Metro)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 
• Line F (Los Angeles Metro) → G Line (Los Angeles Metro)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Procedural nomination, erroneously nominated for PROD by Mjdestroyerofworlds with the justification this service does not exist, and there is no mention of this alternate name in linked article. That having been said, I agree with this rationale myself. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 04:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete ambiguous typo, could also refer to D Line (Los Angeles Metro). - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 05:43, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete LA Metro used "F line" in an early draft, but it was later changed and never officially announced. Lexlex (talk) 15:09, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ambiguous --Devokewater (talk) 13:30, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:08, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Contagious cerebrophagia → Zombie  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article, making the association unclear and possibly leaving readers wondering why they arrived at the target when searching this redirect's name. Steel1943 (talk) 03:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This term seems to be from a (hopefully spoof) essay "Towards a Hermeneutics of Contagious Cerebrophagia in Games of No Agency" by Frank Lantz (I could only find author and title) which has gained no traction. That title looks like a nod towards "Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of Quantum Gravity" by physicist Alan Sokal. Narky Blert (talk) 06:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. If this is a thing, Enwiki has nothing about it. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:18, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Hari-Faliyan → Green bean  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Not mentioned in target article. Seems to be a WP:FORRED is due pertaining to the Hindi language. Steel1943 (talk) 02:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Enwiki has nothing about "Hari-Faliyan". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:15, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Aggie Cupholder → Cup holder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Confusing since "Aggie" is not mentioned in the target page, leaving the reader mislead into thinking information about this subject exists at the target. Steel1943 (talk) 01:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Sounds like one of the many possibilities at Aggie#School nicknames, sports teams or mascots, or possibly something associated with the game of marbles. Narky Blert (talk) 06:12, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikipedia:ATBA → Wikipedia:Blocking policy#Against the blocking administrator  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

I can see zero reason why this link would lead to that target. We don't need a redirect to make an acronym for every subsection of every policy. Primefac (talk) 01:03, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. I had to read the section and the abbreviation multiple times before I thought that it could stand for "Against the blocking administrator". Seventyfiveyears at 01:33, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 16:04, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Non human language → Animal language  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: keep/retarget/delete ] 

Could also refer to Alien language. Probably best to delete. Steel1943 (talk) 00:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as ambiguous. Could also refer to Enochian. Narky Blert (talk) 06:04, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I first thought of computer language when reading the title. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 07:13, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as vague and overly confusing. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:19, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete ambiguous --Devokewater (talk) 15:36, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This redirect is too ambiguous and misleading. Seventyfiveyears at 17:51, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Redirect doesn't make sense, misleading, and probably the reason is rule number one or more in Wikipedia:Redirect#Reasons_for_deleting. StaleGuy22 (talk) 16:47, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above comments. Hardly used anyway. Station1 (talk) 04:54, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete – It is WP:SNOWing. --Soumya-8974 ^talk _contribs ^subpages 09:09, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Implausible target. Aasim 16:24, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page.