Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 836

This is an archive of past discussions on Wikipedia:Teahouse. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current main page.

Archive 830

←

Archive 834

Archive 835

Archive 836

Archive 837

Archive 838

→

Archive 840

Testing text

Can I create lists here?

Testing Testing Testing

Where are wiki-tables generated, and how do I apply them to a Wiki-page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kuyoti (talk • contribs) 15:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

To find about tables, read Help:Table. To answer the question asked in your section heading but not in your text, try at the relevant WikiProject, as you have been advised elsewhere. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey Kuyoti. It looks like you may be interested in WikiProject Video Games, which is a whole community on Wikipedia dedicated to improving our coverage of video games and gaming culture. GMG^talk 16:19, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Esteemed RESOURCE PERSONS,

I would like to draw your kind attention to intimate you that I am SUSANTA SAHOO working as a teacher in SCHOOL & MASS EDUCATION DEPT. (GOVT. OF ODISHA), INDIA. I would like to share my OPINIONS, OBSERVATIONS, ISSUES & SUGGESTIONS related to EDUCATION.

May I kindly be granted the PERMISSION to do the above said work. I'll be grateful for your favourable ACTION.

Regards.

SUSANTA SAHOO (INDIA) — Preceding unsigned comment added by LEARN WITH SUSANTA (talk • contribs) 16:39, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Wikipedia is "the encyclopedia that anyone can edit", so in general any editor can edit any article, provided that the content is supported by references to published reliable sources independent of the subject. Your own personal knowledge of a subject is not usable as a source, as it would be regarded as original research. One piece of advice is to reduce your use of capitals; excessive use of capitals is regarding as SHOUTING and an indication of rudeness. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:15, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

How do you protect your talk page from being vandalism and to stop people from putting rude messages on there. Northatlantic320 (talk) 18:18, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

From looking at what you have deleted from your Talk page, you have been warned five times by three different editors to not add unreferenced content nor delete content without explanation. The warning language is standard. i.e., neither vandalism nor composed to be rude. While editors are not required to keep all entries to their own Talk, most do, or else create an archive for older entries. More to the point, several of your changes to articles have been reverted, including articles where other editors did not bother to post a caution or warning on your Talk. If you believe your changes were correct, then start a discussion on the Talk pages of articles. David notMD (talk) 18:41, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Northatlantic320 page protection is only done in instances where your userpage, take or an article is being vandalised. In this case, your talk has not been vandalised and therefore you have no evidence to present to an admin even if you wanted protection. The only things on your talk (which you have since removed) were vandalism warnings issued to you like your blanking of 2018 Atlantic hurricane season. Please adhere to the messages left by the editors (they don't mean no harm, but to direct you on the Do's and don'ts of Wikipedia) and learn to not vandalise Wikipedia. That way you will last long. Please do feel free to ask where you get stuck in future. I hope this helps. Cheers 6Packs (talk) 19:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the information Northatlantic320 (talk) 19:31, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi there,

Just a quick question: I have translated a page from the Italian Wikipedia and one of the curators has asked to insert some references to the page, which is only right and just. Since there is only one Italian reference on the original page, what shall I do apart from going around and looking for some more on my own?

Thanks,

SPQP — Preceding unsigned comment added by SPQP (talk • contribs) 20:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, SPQP. If the reference in the original page is a reliable source by the standards of English Wikipedia, then you can use it in the English article: English sources are preferred if they exist of a high enough quality, but foreign language sources are acceptable. As for finding other sources: you might find an appropriate WikiProject - perhaps WP:WikiProject Italy - but otherwise there is no particular technique, and you need to look for them. You might find the template {{find sources}} helpful: it produces Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL.

A few other remarks: if you haven't done so already, I recommend you read WP:Translation. In particular, the licence under which almost everything in Wikipedia is published allows the material to be freely reused, provided the source is attributed. You have just said that you translated the material from the Italian Wikipedia: you need to put a statement of the source somewhere, or you will be violating the licence. It would have been adequate to specify it in the edit summary when you first posted the translation; but I suggest you acknowledge it on the article's Talk page Talk:Prince Giuseppe Emanuele Ventimiglia. Please see Copying within Wikipedia for more information. --ColinFine (talk) 20:48, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Rusty Lake is a game developer based in the Netherlands, they recently released their 13th game, Cube Escape: Paradox, I found that they did not have a Wikipedia page and was wondering if they might be a 'Notable' subject? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cynefreth (talk • contribs) 20:37, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Cynefreth, and welcome to the Teahouse. It depends almost entirely on whether, and how much, people with no connection to Lake have chosen to write about them, and been published in reliable places. Please see WP:GNG. (WP:NAUTHOR might also apply, but note that to use any of the criteria in that section, you would need to cite independent sources which established that they met the criterion. It would not be enough for you to assert that they did). --ColinFine (talk) 20:54, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Cynefreth and welcome to teahouse. I noticed you have already created Rusty Lake which I must say, I tagged for quick deletion even before seing your post here. This could be discouraging but learn from the advise you receive here. First, the company seems not notable enough, as yet, to have a Wikipedia article. My Google search has not given convincing reasons/reliable sources to it. Also the article you created has one source which is for the company's website. Do wait a while for it to attain notability and then someone will create an article of it. I hope this helps, do feel free to ask where you need help. Cheers 6Packs (talk) 01:15, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

How do you rename pages?Oceanian Air Spoter (talk) 01:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC) Oceanian Air Spoter

Oceanian Air Spoter you name pages by moving them to the desired and correct name as said by sources. However, page naming only happens when your account is autoconfimed - meaning after 4 days and 10 edits is done. In cases where a page has been in existence on Wikipedia for years, you need to first start a discussion on the article's talk and having other editors give inputs before renaming it. Renaming it instances without taking that into account will be considered controversial 6Packs (talk) 01:23, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Can you write a article about me, I'm new in the film industry? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueLion54 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello BlueLion54 and welcome to the Teahouse.

I'm afraid that most new people in an industry have not garnered the sort of press coverage needed for there to be an article about them here on Wikipedia. Rest assured, that if you become famous (or infamous) there will eventually be an article written about you, but for now you would be better advised to devote your energies to your work. If you have downtime between gigs, we'd love to have you become an editor here, but we'd expect you to edit in areas where you do not have a conflict of interest. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:44, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

BlueLion54 Welcome to Teahouse. Note that Wikipedia discourages autobiography, please read WP:COI. You must wait a little while someone with no Conflict of Interest may write an article you if you become notable. I hope this helps 6Packs (talk) 02:19, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm interested in generating a list of all pages with Unreferenced BLPs (eg https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Unreferenced_BLPs_from_September_2018) AND filtering that against all pages that are part of the WIiiproject:Australia. Does anyone know how to do that?? Cheers, Cabrils (talk) 07:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Ping someone more tech savvy than I. GMG^talk 12:38, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

I have to say, the amount of times the answer is petscan is surprisingly high..so yeah, Cabrils here's it Galobtter (pingó mió) 12:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks Galobtter. You could be superhuman with skills like this... Another quick question hoping I am not wearing out the welcome: I see in PetScan, under the Categories tab, there is a field for Categories in which you have specified the desired template "Unreferenced BLPs". If I want to make other searches for other other templates, can I just replace "Unreferenced BLPs" with a different template? And if so, where do I get a list of those templates? Cabrils (talk) 22:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Cabrils, Unreferenced BLPs is the category you wanted to filter by (see Help:Category and Help:Template); you can replace that with whatever category you want. I suppose the easiest way is to search for your desired category. There are somewhere in the order of a million categories so a list would be rather unwieldy :) Galobtter (pingó mió) 07:50, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Galobtter Thanks again, super helpful! Yes, just starting to make sense of it...cheers Cabrils (talk) 02:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I need help from an editor from scientific background about a inserting a controversy on 2015 regarding Noble prize on discovery of artemisinin. The summary of the matter is here

The controversy abruptly ended when in contrast to Verma's claims, it was realised that artemisinin is not a minor variant of artemisin and the two are entirely different chemicals. Amrev (talk) 07:44, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Amrev. Without knowing which specific scientific page you're refering to, it's going to be a bit hard for anyone to help you. It's sound like you want to make a change to an existing article. If that's the case, then there are two possible ways to do that: (1) be WP:BOLD or (2) be WP:CAUTIOUS. If you decide to be bold and your change is subsequently reverted by another editor, please follow Wikipedia:Dispute resolution and use the article's talk page to discuss the matter with others. On the other hand, if you're cautious, then do your best to explain why the change should be made, providing links to reliable sources which support your position as needed, and then simply wait for others respond. If nobody responds in a reasonable amount of time, scroll up to the top of the article talk page and see if the article falls under the purview of a WikiProject. If it does, you can then ask for assistance at the WikiProject if you want. It's important to remember that other editors might be WP:BUSY, and you shouldn't expect an immediate response to anything you post; however, if nobody has responded in a week or so, then you can probably assume WP:SILENT and just go ahead and make the desired change. You don't really need anyone's permission to edit an article, but you need to remember that Wikipedia is a collaborative editing project which means that discussion is the way to resolve things if another editor later disagrees with the changes you make. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:02, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Marchjuly,

I wanted to edit the following page with the content above but my edits were reverted - because they didn't read neutral. I just want someone to edit the content above to make it concise and neutral.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sunil_Kumar_Verma

Amrev (talk) 08:07, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Since you were already bold and reverted by another editor, you should now use Talk:Sunil Kumar Verma to discuss the changes you want to make. The editor who reverted you probably has the article on their watchlist and may notice your post, but you can post a message on their user talk page asking them to join the discussion and clarify their concerns. Perhaps through this discussion, a neutrally worded version of what you want to add can be worked out. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:16, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks again Marchjuly. The editor of that page who reverted the change now says that my correcting my edit is beyond his/her expertise. Furthermore, he asked me to seek help here and so I am here. All I am requesting now is experts to fix my draft or it doesn't appear vindictive - as it did in the beginning. I can insert all the reference etc here if it help. Please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amrev (talk • contribs) 08:48, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

As Marchjuly told you, and as the editor who reverted you told you in the edit summary of that revert, the place for discussion is on the article talk page. --David Biddulph (talk) 09:12, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

For background to this, It may be worthwhile considering that Alt-Med proponents think that this Nobel prize was for work done in TCM (Traditional Chinese Medicine) which is of course not the case. She did real science. -Roxy, in the middle. wooF 09:17, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

I have a big problem with this section. The text above was first submitted by a User "Chutia verna" immediately blocked for being derogatory (in its most benign translation, "chutia" is idiot or fool, and Verna is the scientist being written about). The text and refs were reverted. Within hours, Amrev posted the identical content. Reversed by W. Carter NOT on basis of the science but because the references were inappropriate. Amrev has also added the criticism of Verma to Talk:Nobel Prize controversies. Amrev has not started a discussion section at Talk:Sunil Kumar Verma, which is what MarchJuly recommended. David notMD (talk) 09:23, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks all, understood the process. Further discussion shall happen in the talk page. Irrespective of the users who edited the page above, facts should still get incorporated into wiki. One of the editor who reverted the changes, later says it is beyond her/her expertise to edit the article. Furthermore, how come references to published news article where members of Nobel Committee have responded are not credible? Amrev (talk) 09:51, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

I wrote a short version, using one of the references, and added it to the article. David notMD (talk) 14:21, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Above, Amrev has written "it was realised that artemisinin is not a minor variant of artemisin and the two are entirely different chemicals." In Wikipedia, Artemisin is a redirect to Artemisinin, which does not mention the name artemisin. So there's some misunderstanding somewhere. Maproom (talk) 14:47, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

Unfortunate coincidence of names. Artemisinin is C15H22O5 and Artemisin is C15H18:04. However, some website content misspells artemininin as artemisin when describing the anti-malarial drug (which is the former, not the latter). See https://arstechnica.com/science/2015/04/how-malaria-is-evolving-to-survive-our-most-potent-drug/. In my opinion the redirect treats "artemisin" as a misspelling, but that is confusing given the existence of artemisin. David notMD (talk) 15:43, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

I've created a stub article at artemisin to reduce this confusion Galobtter (pingó mió) 16:49, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

→Thanks for this David notMD. I followed the controversy since it erupted. As you mentioned about the names are quite similar. Verma's main argument was artemininin is a minor variant of artemisin and the latter was known to Indian community almost a century ago. I will talk more about it with the references in main article for you to further edit. Galobtter, Maproom, here is a file showing the difference between the two, if needed. Amrev (talk) 22:03, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

We already had confusion between artemisin and artemisinin, and now two of you have mentioned artemininin (with three ns and no s). Is this a typo, an alternative name, or a third substance? Maproom (talk) 18:48, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

My error. I meant "artemisinin". David notMD (talk) 03:16, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I'm already registered as a user of the French Wikipedia and have published an article. I would like to publish the English version, however I cannot change the title. Does the 4-day rule apply again when you switch to another linguistic version of Wikipedia? Thank you for your help! --FCDM (talk) 07:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)FCDM

Each language's Wikipedia is independent, and you'd have to meet enwiki's requirements before you were able to move your draft to mainspace. Looking at User:FCDM/sandbox, you'll need to remove the misplaced external links, or convert them to references, and you have tried to call up templates or categories which may exist in frwiki but don't exist here. As a newcomer here, you could usefully read the advice at WP:Your first article. When you think the draft is fit to be published as an article you could submit it for AFC review by adding {{subst:submit}} to the top of the draft. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi there, I am quite new to editing Wikipedia. I have a suggestion for the time community to discuss, and wondering where to start, is such a big community and I am quite new to this in the first place so not really sure what I am doing at all. I did create a sandbox version of a page, as a developer that made sense, but not sure how to share that, or who to talk to. Could I have some guidance on that please. The sandbox page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Craiglambie/sandbox Thanks in advance. Craiglambie (talk) 11:33, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Craiglambie, I seem unable to get it. Why do you copy the whole article to your sandbox at User:Craiglambie/sandbox? I can't see at the first glance (neither at the second and third...) where your copy differs from the original. Couldn't you just make desired changes right in the Hong Kong Time, so that is's clear what and where you change? --CiaPan (talk) 12:43, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi CiaPan, sorry for copying article, I wasn't sure the best method for this suggestion. Or where to start discussion, so firstly thanks for starting this chat now.

My suggestions are around listing the Timezone Serial in the infobox on the RHS and as a heading, with reference to IANA website and PHP timezone website. Hong Kong Time is just a random timezone that I happened to be looking for the serial of. If I change the original, I presume it needs approval or something if you are suggesting that is best place to do it right? Happy to try that. Craiglambie (talk) 13:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey Craiglambie. In any case where you feel you are making a improvement to an article, Wikipedia encourages you to be bold and go right ahead. No need for prior approval. If another editor disagrees that it's an improvement and reverts the change, then you should discuss the disagreement on the article talk page and try to reach a consensus about which version we should keep on the article. GMG^talk 14:01, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks GreenMeansGo and CiaPan I will give it a go, be bold! Craiglambie (talk) 14:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I've drafted an article, and it meets the criteria of having more that 10 edits and my account is at least 4 days old. However, it is still designated as a draft. Does it become a full article automatically within a certain timeframe or do I need to do something to activate this? I've read materials about moving articles, but there is no move command as described. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxaneramos (talk • contribs) 04:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Roxaneramos and welcome to the Teahouse.

No, nothing automatically promotes a draft into an article. Someone has to do that with the move action.

Your account has the autoconfirmed status needed for you to be able to move a page from draft to mainspace. It's probably a good thing that you didn't find the move command yet, since your draft Draft:Eduardo Vilaro does not have the required in-line citations. You have also not formatted it properly for a WP article, so someone will have to fix that. The overall tone of the draft feels promotional to me, so that, too, would likely have to be toned down. If you moved it in its current state, I'd expect a new page reviewer to just draftify it again, if they didn't nominate it for deletion.

Creating a new article on Wikipedia is a difficult task and you've made good progress towards it. If the articles for creation process were not so backlogged, I'd suggest using it to get a more formal review of your draft. One option, that does not require getting a review, is to use the Articles for Creation Help Desk to request a reading on whether your subject meets notability guidelines. To do that, point to the 3 to 5 references that, in your mind, best establish notability according to the appropriate criteria, either as an artist or more generally as a biography. State which criteria is met. If the notability hurdle is overcome, you should be able to move the draft to article space without so much concern whether it will be immediately nominated for deletion. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 06:10, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Roxaneramos your draft Draft:Eduardo Vilaro sounds promotional in its current state. I undid a few promotional content but it still needs fixing before it can be moved into mainspace. If it was to go live in that state, it will either be tagged for WP:QD as promotional content or be returned into draft space by a reviewer. Fix those changes and give more reliable sources to it and then submit the draft for review. Do feel free to ask any further questions you many need. Cheers 6Packs (talk) 06:41, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Many thanks for your feedback, recommendations and editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Roxaneramos (talk • contribs) 15:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I think I created an account because I received responses from you but now cannot access my account. Can you help me? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.222.17.227 (talk) 16:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Unless you remember the username AND password, there's nothing we can do here to help you remember it. If you forgot your password, but remember your username, and have registered an email address with that username, you can request a password reset by attempting to log-in first. --Jayron32 16:51, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Can you remember the user name of your account, or can you remember which articles you edited? If not, you might as well register a new account. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

If you are talking about responses at the Teahouse, can you tell us about the subject of that conversation? Knightrises10 (talk) 17:28, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I see that user:Lavidav has been extensively removing interwiki links to Eastern European wikis and cannot help wondering if they have been acting responsibly, or are just campaigning to isolate certain languages. Could a knowledgeable editor please check his contributions? They were warned on the 2018-09-19 on their talk page, but seem to have been active on the 20th. PJTraill (talk) 10:46, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey PJTraill. As far as I know, now that the interwiki links are housed at Wikidata, these links serve no real purpose. Notice that this edit to Kestrel removed the link to ru:Пустельга (значения), but in the side bar the articles are still linked because of the Wikidata item. It also removed the link to de:Turmfalke; however, looking at that article, it seems to be linked to Common kestrel instead. GMG^talk 10:56, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, @GreenMeansGo:. I did wonder about Wikidata, about which I know too little, and ought to follow up. Maybe @Lavidav: is just performing useful clean-up, but it would help if they were to provide edit summaries, perhaps referring to a relevant explanation of Wikidata. I am also curious as to whether Wikidata can be used to make both Kestrel and Common kestrel link to de:Turmfalke; perhaps I can found out for myself. PJTraill (talk) 18:53, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Good day,

Just found out today how to edit our charity page. A first time user. Very surprised to learn the process appears to be open to anyone who wants to add comment.. Is there no way to restrict the access to authorized persons only

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriscrew (talk • contribs) 16:24, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Access is restricted to authorised persons only, which means almost anybody except those (like yourself) with a conflict of interest. You are obviously labouring under a misapprehension regarding ownership of articles. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:32, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

If you want to set up a website where you have control, there are many web-hosting service providers, but Wikipedia is not one of those. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:35, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

There is no "our." With certain limits, anyone can edit any article. The limits apply when an article has become a vandalism target, or for other narrowly defined circumstances. David notMD (talk) 17:45, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I know this is standard in English Wikipedia, but I think I prefer German Wikipedia’s approach, where anyone can edit, but the result has to be approved by an editor of a certain standing before it becomes the version normally seen by the public. @David Biddulph: do you know whether this has been considered for en.wikipedia, and if so why it was not adopted? PJTraill (talk) 19:04, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I wasn't around when the enwiki rules were being made. The nearest to that is the minority of articles which have pending changes protection applied. --David Biddulph (talk) 19:16, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

The picture of my village church is incorrect (it is of another village )and needs replacing . How do I go about this please ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charleswnixon (talk • contribs) 06:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

You can comment on the talk page of the relevant article. --David Biddulph (talk) 08:03, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello Charleswnixon, and welcome to the Teahouse! In your shoes (assuming you are right, you didn't tell us what article this is about) I would start with searching at "Commons", see [1], which is where most of WP:s images are kept. If there is nothing useful there, consider taking a good picture yourself and upload it to Commons by the process here:[2].

If any of this "work", the new image can then be used in the article. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 08:05, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Charleswnixon: Please link the page where you saw the wrong image. Then we can say more. PrimeHunter (talk) 20:08, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Am trying to update the article about the Warren Thomas Chapel in Hickman, Ky. The curator of the museum housed in this chapel has the original document deeding the property over to these former slaves from the Freedman's Bureau. I have read the info under the copyright, etc. topics in your website but not sure how we could protect a picture of this document from being used by others without permission. Can you point me to the proper place to find my answers? Thanks.--SarahBradyStrange (talk) 17:31, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

If an image has been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, or to en:Wikipedia, it may be used by others without permission. If the copyright holder does not wish it to be so used, then it should not be uploaded. Maproom (talk) 17:57, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

SarahBradyStrange It's worth saying to any curator still nervous about making their museum resources freely available, that it's very often beneficial to the institution to have the extra awareness that sharing this material brings. Whilst Maproom is absolutely right that an image can be re-used by anyone once it's been validly uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, the re-user is still obligated to acknowledge the original source/uploader. So an account name that incorporates the naming of the museum would always be associated with any re-used version of that image. As a retired museum curator with 30 years experience (who regrets discovering Wikipedia rather too late in their career!), I find it frustrating how many of my former colleagues still fail to grasp the immense benefits of sharing their resources more widely, often under the mistaken belief that they'll lose out on some (in most cases, non-existent) income, or that the have to release high-resolution versions. Just make them good enough for online use only, and everyone benefits, but nobody loses. Wikipedia:GLAM can offer help and support to curators and institutions interested in making their resources available. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:12, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

im just adding tags to pages that need citations of the information. public entitys hate this for it does not allow for cheating of the consumer — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adarequiermentwiki (talk • contribs) 16:09, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

-- — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adarequiermentwiki (talk • contribs) 16:14, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Your addition of the same one or two links to vast numbers of articles does not appear constructive. There are many pieces of legislation which are applicable to the operations of the subjects concerned, but we don't list each of those pieces of legislation for each subject. Furthermore, if the additions were valid they do not meet the requirements to be defined as minor edits. --David Biddulph (talk) 16:29, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

meets requirements bad faith to revisions removing context in wich the systems or product or public entity is governed by desine in the united states — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adarequiermentwiki (talk • contribs) 16:35, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Reply didn't seem to be in comprehensible English, but we can ignore it as the OP has now been blocked for sockpuppetry. --David Biddulph (talk) 23:50, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

I created a draft Draft:Jade Thompson with reliable sources, the same with simple English wiki and they accepted the page because she won Britain & Ireland's Next Top Model in 2011. She has been dating American actress Lindsay Lohan since August 2018. Could this page go to main space? Here's Jade Thompson article on Simple English Wikipedia: simple:Jade_Thompson StylesAssisted (talk) 10:46, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey StylesAssisted. There's still quite a bit of content in the draft that is not sourced, for example, the entire biography section. The minimum standard for acceptance of a biography of a living person is that all content needs to be sourced. So the bits the currently don't have sources either need those sources added or need to be removed, although I'm not sure you'd be left with much of an article if you removed it all. GMG^talk 10:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC):

After looking at the draft for a while I 'm under impression the main achievement of the subject is being a model and winning a model competition. Once. Several years ago. Oh, and the main reason to make the article about her is that she announced she is in a homosexual relation since... let me see... yes, since August. That's already a MONTH. Wow! Really impressive. And that's all you need to have a Wikipedia article about you??? Yay, I'm starting to look for a new partner...! --CiaPan (talk) 11:54, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Umm...the only thing you need to have a Wikipedia article in sustained in-depth coverage in reliable sources. That's largely agnostic as to what that coverage is about. If this person meets that standard then they should have an article. If they do not then they should not. GMG^talk 12:12, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

The article Draft:Jade Thompson needs refs. I don't know how to make a reflist box to add refs in and/or edit an existing reflist. Plus, there is still notability in the article that she wins the Britain and Ireland's Next Top Model in 2011. (Redacted) StylesAssisted (talk) 12:53, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey StylesAssisted. There isn't any kind of ref box to add. You just need to add additional inline citations as you already have, but need to include them for the content that is currently unreferenced. For example:

Johnny told the devil "you son of a gun, I'm the best there's ever been."<ref>The Devil went down to Georgia. (1979) Charlie Daniels. ''Epic Records''.</ref>

Which gives you this:

Johnny told the devil "you son of a gun, I'm the best there's ever been."^[1]

References

1. ^ The Devil went down to Georgia. (1979) Charlie Daniels. Epic Records.

Hope that helps. GMG^talk 12:57, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

It's not really fair. Simple English Wikipedia with this article met the notability and was kept to main space. She is famous. I'm not very good with refs. Could someone search her and find sites relating to Britain & Ireland's Next Top Model. StylesAssisted (talk) 13:02, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

On your user page you state I usually add refs, Lyndaship (talk) 13:22, 28 September 2018 (UTC)

I want to change Header of an article. I made a page for a person and the header is not his name. It shows my login id as header and same is the permalink. How to resolve it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.56.233.103 (talk) 06:13, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi 202.x and welcome to the Teahouse! You probably mean that the title of the article is incorrect. In order to change it, you need to move the page to a new title. That requires you to log in and become autoconfirmed. Regards —AE (talk • contributions) 06:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, IP user. If the title of the page starts with your Login name, presumably with "User:" on the front, this means that you have not created your draft article in article space, but in your user space. This is probably a good thing, because when inexperienced users create new articles directly in article space, they often don't meet the minimum standards for an article, and get deleted. If the title of the draft is "User:(your username)/(some other name), then this is ideal: you have create your draft in a WP:User subpage, which is one of the recommended places to do it. But if it is "User:(your username)", then you have created it in your user page, which is not what that is for, and you should move it. If you tell us what its actual name is, or what your username is, we can help you better. --ColinFine (talk) 08:15, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

By the way, if you haven't already read your first article, I recommend you do so. Creating a new article is one of the hardest tasks in editing Wikipedia. --ColinFine (talk) 08:26, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

On the r u still down page can we get a new picture it looks to me a little too old and outdated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Biggiefan1999 (talk • contribs) 22:39, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

The image is the cover, so blame it on the record label not us if you don't like it. In any case, it's a photo from 1996; do you really need to have it explained why there are unlikely to be any photos more recent than that? ‑ Iridescent 22:47, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

@Biggiefan1999: The R U Still Down? (Remember Me) page is about an album, not about the artist, so it presents an album's cover, not the artist's portrait (a portrait being on the cover is just a coincidence). So I'm afraid you'll not see a new cover unless there is a new edition released. --CiaPan (talk) 09:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi,

I am new to writing articles on wiki, my first article was marked for speedy deletion and that has left me a bit frustrated and now I need help on how to go about it. Anyone available to help please? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shamszy (talk • contribs) 10:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hi Shamszy. Welcome to the Teahouse. I'm not surprised you're frustrated - for a new user, creating a brand new page that meets all the requirements of this massive encyclopaedia is one of the hardest of tasks you can undertake here. I think I'd done 9 months of editing before I felt brave enough to create my first one! Do have a read of Wikipedia:Your first article and try doing The Wikipedia Adventure - there are 15 badges to collect as you learn the basics of editing and what Notability and Reliable Sources mean - these are two really key elements to writing an encyclopaedia page in a neutral, non-promotional tone. I can't see any other edits associated with your account to be able to comment on your past editing. But, just like driving, it's often advisable to move off gently and build up speed slowly as you gain editing experience. Or you stand a good chance of crashing. So, I'd advise you to work on future new article as a draft and submit it to Articles for Creation where you'll receive helpful feedback if it doesn't make the grade at that point in time. You can then work on it further and resubmit it when ready. Hoping this helps, and welcome to Wikipedia! Regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 10:22, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

I would add in addition to the above good advice, that the article was deleted in part because it was a copyright violation, just copied from another website. Wikipedia cannot allow that for legal reasons. 331dot (talk) 10:24, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

(ec) Hi, Shamszy! Probably reading Wikipedia:Your first article first will be a good choice. :) --CiaPan (talk) 10:25, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

As the header says, I've been trying to add an image from the english wiki to other languages. Is/are there a page(s) where this is easily explained? Dutchy45 (talk) 10:45, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey Dutchy45. This could be quite easy to do or (on certain language projects) totally impossible depending on the image and whether it is a free file or a non-free file used under a claim of fair use. It would probably help answer your question with more substance if you could link to the image you are working with. GMG^talk 10:49, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Image in question. I hope this is what you mean by linking?! Kudos on the speedy reply (did not expect that) afterthought: looking to copy to Dutch, Portugese and German. Dutchy45 (talk) 11:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey Dutchy45. Unfortunately that appears to be a copyrighted non-free work used under a claim of fair use. So it would have to be uploaded to each local project individually, also under a claim of fair use. But not every language project allows non-free content as the English Wikipedia does. I know that the German Wikipedia does not allow non-free media. You may have to ask editors on the Dutch and Portuguese projects to see what their local policy is. GMG^talk 11:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

thank you! Dutchy45 (talk) 11:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, I have been working on Draft:Natasha Mudhar for several months now, and making the recommended updates to the article. Despite submitting it several weeks ago, it does not seem any closer to being approved. Whilst I know there are several thousand articles for approval, is there any order of priority for article approved which may see it approved soon, or is it dependent on the most recently approved articles? Many thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DAL123 (talk • contribs) 12:16, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

The order in which drafts are reviewed is up to each individual reviewer. It is possible that some reviewers will give priority to new submissions rather than resubmissions after a draft has previously been declined. The age profile of the drafts awaiting review can be seen at Category:AfC pending submissions by age. One thing which you can do while awaiting review is to tidy it up to deal with references used more than once. The tidier it is the easier it will be for a reviewer, and this might speed the process up. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

I have a problem where I added factual, not bias info to a wiki page but it was taken down — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thothunter (talk • contribs) 13:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hey Thothunter. Edits like this are obvious vandalism, and if you continue, you will be blocked from editing. GMG^talk 13:09, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

To be honest that was obvious vandalism however I only did that because they took down my information on the rotten tomatoes score given to monster house Thothunter (talk) 13:19, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Good day please I am having difficulty writing an article on promotional. Kindly assist — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mojisolafolorunso (talk • contribs) 17:32, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

As was explained on your user talk page, and in the deletion log for your sandbox, promotion is forbidden on Wikipedia. --David Biddulph (talk) 17:42, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

I can't seam to install twinkle. I added it to my preferences page and clicked save but can't use it A 10 fireplane (talk) 17:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello A 10 fireplane. Did you clear your browser cache? If not, you must. I have also seen your edit history, which shows you are editing using Mobile. Unfortunately, you can't use Twinkle on mobile view. Instead, you will have to change to desktop view. Then, you can see the Twinkle option at the top. I hope it helps - Knightrises10 (talk) 19:11, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

@Knightrises10: ok I got ya, thank you for your help A 10 fireplane (talk) 20:14, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello. How long does it take for an article submission to be reviewed? I have one waiting in my sandbox and need to get done with it. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Recorder XH (talk • contribs) 13:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Perhaps you missed what it says in the brown box on your draft: "This may take more than two months, since drafts are reviewed in no specific order. There are 4026 pending submissions waiting for review." And from 2 4 sections further up on this Teahouse page: "The age profile of the drafts awaiting review can be seen at Category:AfC pending submissions by age.". --David Biddulph (talk) 13:27, 25 September 2018 (UTC)Archived.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:59, 7 December 2018 (UTC)

And just an observation that you submitted your draft today. And the references are bare URLs. Is there a reason for the rush to get it reviewed? David notMD (talk) 14:29, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

The article concerns the chief opposition alliance in that country, where the election will be held in December. The alliance was formed only in the last few days. It is a landmark alliance for it is the first time such diverse groups have come together.--Recorder XH (talk) 15:37, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Recorder XH. I fear that, like many people, you misunderstand what Wikipedia is. It is not a means of promotion, no matter how worthy the subject is; it is also not a newssite, and there is no deadline. If the alliance is only a few days old, then it is unlikely that it is yet notable in the special sense that Wikipedia uses that word: i.e. there is probably not enough independent material published about it yet - for this purpose Wikipedia is not interested in anything published or written by the alliance or its associates, or based on an interview of press release. We require that several people who have no connection at all with the subject have chosen to write about it, at some length, in reliably published places. None of the sources you currently cite in your draft appear to me to be what we are looking for: independent discussion of the subject: they all look as if they are based on interview or press releases. I suspect that it is just TOOSOON for this subject to appear in an encyclopaeida.

Also note that if we have an article about the NUP, it should draw on all reliably-published commentary about it, whether supporting or critical of it: it must not simply report what the subject wants to say about itself. --ColinFine (talk) 17:05, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

@ColinFine:, how long does it take to give Wikipedia notability to a political alliance of large political parties (with membership between 100,000 and 1 million)? The article is merely a start up and can certainly be expanded by anyone, including for criticism of the group (for example, and this again proves it is not too soon at all, the PM of Bangladesh yesterday said some harsh rhetoric about the NUP). The sources provided are independent, reliable media that are already used in Wikipedia. The sources are the leading headline stories of the past two weeks and not based on press releases and interviews.--Recorder XH (talk) 18:21, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

The time it takes, Recorder XH is the time it takes for several people unconnected with the subject to choose to have articles or books about the subject published by reliable publishers. That might be quite quick - it is conceivable that it is not too soon for this alliance; but the references you included do not show it. It doesn't matter whether the article is complete or not: if the subject is does not currently meet the criteria for notability, then no article about it will be accepted, however written. The number of adherents is irrelevant. If you want the draft to be accepted, it is up to you to find sources which meet the criteria. Otherwise you are wasting your time.

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL. --ColinFine (talk) 20:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

What is the procedure for create music album wiki page without disturbing already data here ? Exactly which type of references are required for that ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Naveensharma1993 (talk • contribs) 20:34, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Naveensharma1993. The procedure for creating an article about a music album is the same as the procedure for creating an article about any other topic: first find the independent reliable published sources required to establish that it is notable (the alternative criteria in NALBUM might apply, but if so, you will still need sources to justify that). Please see your first article for general advice about the difficult task of creating a Wikipedia article. --ColinFine (talk) 20:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

When using citation templates, what are DOI and PMID? Anobium625 (talk) 22:46, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Looks like they're for using Digital object identifiers and PubMed identifiers. More info on how to use them can be found at WP:DOI and WP:PMID. Random character sequence (talk) 22:51, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

That was a quick response! Thank you. Anobium625 (talk) 23:00, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

v — Preceding unsigned comment added by Takenix (talk • contribs) 23:07, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Do you have any suggestions anyone? Any articles I should edit? What people I can collaborate? Thanks I love rpgs (talk) 20:19, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

There's some good info that was added to your talk page that will help you understand editing guidelines. If RPG is role playing games, you can look at the Role-playing game article, and even the RPG template could give you some editing ideas. Read the talk pages, look at the history, and if you have questions about the articles, leave them on the article talk pages. You can also put some info on your user page, such as adding hobby templates, so your user name isn't red. TimTempleton ^{(talk) (cont)} 21:35, 21 September 2018 (UTC)

If RPG is not roleplayinggames, see RPG. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:55, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome I love rpgs! I would also like to add that your personal knowledge or preference is just a part of it. When editing, you also need to consider the sources that are available to you since you need to cite whatever you add to a page. Regarding the process of editing, if you are having difficulty with wiki markup, you can start with the Visual Editor in the Edit page. There are also pages that you can go to listing articles that need editing such as this and this. You can also try joining WikiProjects such as this one for video games. - Darwin Naz (talk) 23:09, 25 September 2018 (UTC)