User talk:Ernsanchez00

Ernsanchez00 (talk) 23:07, 17 February 2023 (UTC)Ernestine Sanchez[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Ernsanchez00! Thank you for your contributions. This is an encyclopedia, so remember that it's a necessity to include references listing reliable websites, newspapers, articles, books and other sources you have used to write or expand articles. Please understand that these sources should verify the information in a fair and accurate manner. However, you must not copy and paste text you find anywhere, except for short quotations, marked as such with quote marks and carefully cited to the source the quote was taken from. New articles and statements added to existing articles may be deleted by others if unreferenced or referenced poorly or if they are copyright violations. See referencing for beginners for more details.

I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page.

Here are some more pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:32, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ernsanchez00 and welcome to Wikipedia. I was wondering why you unlinked "Birds of a Feather" in this edit? Thanks. DH85868993 (talk) 08:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Upon further consideration, I'm guessing it's probably because it was already linked earlier in the article. In which case, no problem. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 08:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because of celebrity's last name that came first alphabetically with a clicked link. The other celebrities that came second/third last name alphabetically that are unlinked because it's a same TV show that already starred in.

Regards.

Ernsanchez00 (talk) Ernsanchez00 (talk) 09:57, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Fred Gandt. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Dodie, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 03:08, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Ernsanchez00 responded to this issue politely by email, confirming an understanding of it. Fred Gandt · talk · contribs 03:28, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of stage names. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 22:05, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, thank you! I would use the sandbox instead. Ernsanchez00 (talk) 22:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of stage names beginning with C has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:LISTCRUFT, no prose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article List of stage names beginning with A has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:LISTCRUFT, no prose

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Taking Out The Trash (talk) 22:20, 20 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was:

This submission seems to be a test edit and not an article worthy of an encyclopedia. Please use the sandbox for any editing tests, but do not submit for review until you have an article that you want reviewed for inclusion in Wikipedia. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ernsanchez00/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ernsanchez00! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 01:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you added your name to the list of participants in WikiProject Orphanage. We really appreciate your help! The first things you could do to get started with us are:

1. Read the Wikipedia:Orphan page, especially the section marked "Criteria". The page contains a lot of good advice to get you started, as well as the standard procedures we are using to de-orphan articles.
2. Look at {{Orphan}}, and {{Multiple issues}} closely and make sure you know how to use them correctly.
3. Keep de-orphaning! Category:Orphaned articles contains all orphaned articles organized by month and there is a large backlog we need to clear out so we appreciate any help we can get.

Of course, you may have already known all of this, in which case sorry for the spam. Either way, let me know if there's any way I can help you contribute more to the project!

JoeNMLC (talk) 20:36, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ernsanchez00

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username The Night Watch, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, List of stage names beginning with E, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|The Night Watch}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

The Night Watch (talk) 06:27, 25 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to List of stage names—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:20, 2 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of stage names, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Montgomery. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Just a couple of points of note in the editing of the List of stage names article -

• The first line of the article states that "This list of stage names lists names used by those in the entertainment industry, alphabetically by their stage name's surname".

You've done a fine job of alphabetizing the list so far, but it should be by their SURNAME, not their first name as you have done.

• The article clearly states that people who are NOT listed include "Those who changed their name to perform a character or alter ego, including drag performers and professional wrestlers".

Any wrestlers should not be added unless they are known for something else apart from wrestling, such as Hulk Hogan who is also an actor.

On a separate matter, I think it sucks that they have deleted the individual pages for each letter. Others have commented on how the article needs splitting but when something is done about it, the new pages get deleted. Maybe you have to do all of them in a Sandbox and publish them all at once. Ozzieboy (talk) 18:28, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Refer MOS:JR

"Do not put a comma before Jr. or Sr. (or variations such as Jnr)."

Thanks Ozzieboy (talk) 11:17, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stop putting "deceased" in infoboxes. Infoboxes should contain a minimal amount of information. It is not standard for the template. Whether someone is deceased belongs in the text of the article, and it usually is found there already. Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Sundayclose (talk) 18:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of high schools in New Jersey, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hackensack.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While there are definitely school articles where a move / rename is appropriate, the use of the WP:COMMONNAME should take priority. Regardless of how the school is listed on their website, it would seem that there are very few articles where "Junior-Senior" or "Jr./Sr." are part of the common name used in articles about the school. You may want to exercise more discretion in such page moves and seek consensus for the name change, which have in many cases spent 15 or more years with the same names. Alansohn (talk) 21:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you removing the grade ranges for districts in List of school districts in New Jersey? There are all sorts of varieties of grade ranges (K-12, K-6, K-8, 7-12 and 9-12, among others) and the detail provides the reader some understanding of the structure of the district. Why remove this relevant content? Alansohn (talk) 23:55, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry about that. Thank you! I will re-edit the grade ranges. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 00:03, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Corey Haim, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:13, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Thank you. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 17:02, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ernsanchez00. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Ernsanchez00/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 02:02, 24 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dean Ford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Airdrie.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, thank you! Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 06:17, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I wanted to explain why I reverted a change you made to Dexter Doria. In this edit, you added a birth date, but you didn't cite a reliable source. Wikipedia has strict rules on content in biographies of living persons because this can impact real peoples' lives. Please be aware that many sites on the internet purport to give information about celebrities, but few of them of reliable. Sites like the IMDb use user-generated content, and they should not be cited in biographical articles. Similarly, celebrity gossip websites should not be used because most of them don't have a history of fact checking or publishing corrections. Fan sites and blogs are self-published and have no editorial control. We also can't use primary documents, such as government birth databases or genealogical websites (which are also typically user-generated, as above). This means that the number of available sources is quite slim, and we often have to either go without this information or wait until a source like The Philippine Star or the BBC publishes an interview that includes a birth date. If you're not sure whether a source is reliable, you can ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:29, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so sorry about that, thank you for the explanation about Dexter Doria's Bio. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 08:34, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ernsanchez00. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:32, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of hospitals in England, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Braintree.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, thank you. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 07:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your recent edits to Dorothy Tenham. I'm proposing to revert the change you made of 'actor' to 'actress' and I want to run my reason past you before doing the edit. It's modern practice to use gender neutral terms in describing people's jobs. Gender specific terms like actress, aviatrix, conductress, comedienne and so on are increasingly - and in some cases completely - obsolete. It was a considered decision on my part to use the word actor when writing the piece. We do not know if Tenham preferred actor or actress to define her early career but as she was clearly an advanced and forward-thinking individual I suspect she would have used actor, particularly later in her career. Please let me know your view. If I do not hear from you I shall make the reversion.

Worth observing as well, I think, that if you are making a change in an article it should be consistent throughout the piece. You left at least two further references to 'actor' unaltered.

Regards, Vortexionio (talk) 19:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, but thank you for the info about the edits to Dorothy Tenham. I didn't know that I made changes from actor to actress. I thought she was a female. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 19:42, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for your response. Since you haven't stated any objection to a reversion I shall make the change. Regards Vortexionio (talk) 13:58, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see that you've changed the sorting of several Dutch biographies, such as this change. For Dutch surnames, the sorting should not include the lowercase particle, so "Leonie ter Braak" should be sorted as {{DEFAULTSORT:Braak, Leonie ter}} (see also: Wikipedia:Categorization/Sorting names, section "Other exceptions"). Thanks, Simeon (talk) 17:28, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, thank you. I thought the last name "ter" is supposed to be in the last name. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 18:05, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Help delete template for acticle Akane Yamaguchi. Thanks you. 27.64.221.154 (talk) 05:47, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, which part of the template you want me to delete for the article of Akane Yamaguchi? The infobox? Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 05:49, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phill Jupitus, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Category.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, thank you! It's all fixed. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 06:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ernsanchez00, can you explain why you removed the three categories in this edit?-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:22, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, the three categories that are belong to the redirect page, sorry about that. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 21:46, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

At least two of the categories seemed pretty pertinent, so I was scratching my head over the removals. Thanks for double checking!-- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:50, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Eric ^talk 12:36, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for that, thank you. I should fill in the edit summary. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 13:03, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When you change categories, would you then please put them (back) into alphabetical order? Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 00:12, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I got you. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 00:15, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ernsanchez00, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Category:Actors from Hoddesdon, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: The reason given is not a valid speedy deletion criterion. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 22:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem, Ivanvector. Thanks for understanding. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 22:02, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On second thought, I see what you're trying to do, and I deleted the category as a G7 user request deletion. You can also use C1 for categories that are completely empty but there is normally a 7-day hold. Sorry for the confusion. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 22:03, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Andrew Garfield, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. The article doesn't appear to mention Garfield working as a model; perhaps I missed it? DonIago (talk) 02:04, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Donlago, thanks for understanding about the categorization about Andrew Garfield. I didn't know he's a model as his occupation at this point. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 08:42, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello how are you? I want to ask you if you can merge on wikipedia in Spanish merge these two articles and that deal with the same topic of the the Re'im music festival massacre between Gaza and Israel but both articles created are on Wikipedia in Spanish --190.219.223.224 (talk) 23:05, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, unfortunately, I am not so sure of how to merge your two articles about music festival massacre you requested me, so my apologies about that. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 13:51, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Comedy actors has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Of course, no problem. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 15:07, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Meredith Scardino, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Hi Ernsanchez00, I see you've been asked or warned about adding incorrect categories at least twice before. Would you please stop doing that? soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 12:39, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I apologized about that. I will stop adding incorrect categories. It was my huge mistake. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 12:42, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

From the looks of it, the vast majority of your edits are helpful and constructive, I appreciate your work! soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 13:20, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sitcom actors has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. MPFitz1968 (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Mass category creations and additions by Ernsanchez00 without discussion. Thank you. Amaury • 20:11, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Lab Rats: Elite Force, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. When adding a category check that the category is supported by what is in the article. You latest category additions appear automatic and added without consideration of what is in the article. "multi-camera sitcoms" categories require both that the article describes the series as a sitcom and that there is referenced content in the article that talks to the camera setup. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:03, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geraldo, my apologies, thank you for explaining to me about the "Lab Rats: Elite Force" and the multi-camera sitcom categories. Didn't realized that. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 17:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest going over your latest category additions and removing the incorrect ones. I only looked at categories that were added to articles in my watchlist. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:13, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which incorrect ones are you discussing about? The multi-camera sitcoms category of each decade or no? Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 17:17, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the series isn't described as a sitcom, remove all categories that have the word "sitcom" in them. If the article doesn't mention camera setup, remove all categories that mention camera setup. This applies to all decades, years, or any other added words in the category.

If a series is a "sitcom" that will be mentioned in the intro or lead section. Camera setup is usually mentioned in the production section or lead if considered important to the article writers and can be sourced. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:27, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that makes sense, thank you. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 17:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ernsanchez, I've noticed your name on my watchlist for edits like this and this. Just leaving a friendly pointer to the guideline on subcategorization, which says generally not to add an article to a category when it is already in a subcategory of that category. For example, Category:YouTubers from Minnesota is a subcategory of Category:American YouTubers, so an article in the state category does not need to be added to the higher-level category. Thanks for your other good category work. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 21:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Hameltion, no problem, and I appreciated your explanation about the subcategorization of YouTubers from Minnesota/American YouTubers category. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 21:22, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Rebecca Jane Brown, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 111.82.10.232 (talk) 08:06, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry about that… Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 08:08, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That was a bogus warning by that IP, who has been blocked, and your edit at the article was restored. MPFitz1968 (talk) 08:33, 10 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Male actors from the Golden Age of Hollywood has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 00:35, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please slow up on your category creations. You have already been warned once about your mass category creations. The YouTuber categories do not appear in need of diffusion to such a narrow level such as by city or county in which there may be only 2 or 3 entries. For example, Category:Canadian YouTubers did not seem so overly populated that Category:Canadian YouTubers by city and Category:Canadian YouTubers by province or territory (and the subcategories within) needed to be created. You should bring this to discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject YouTube to achieve consensus before proceeding further. Thank you. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:47, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I came up with the idea about the category of Canadian YouTubers by city or by province/territory. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe the categorization you are attempting is too narrow. I may nominate these categories for merging back into their parent categories (probably not today). Please refrain from creating more or adding more articles to the ones you created in the meantime. Thanks. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Welsh sitcom actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:16, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Scottish sitcom actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please review renaming a page, what you're doing is Changing a category there's a big difference. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:47, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem, thank you. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 03:50, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 03:53, 17 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ernsanchez00,

I'm not sure what you are trying to do here. You empty a category, which is an "out of process" act and is discouraged and then you put a CFD notice on the category. But it links to a page (February 11th) where there is no related CFD discussion about this category. So, I go back and forth, search different days with CFD discussions and I find one on February 4th that has a discussion about actors and actresses from different regional areas but the discussion doesn't include this category. You can't retroactively include a category in a CFD discussion that is not only CLOSED but didn't include this category in the first place. You're not a new editor any longer so it's hard from me to follow the thought process here.

So, here's what I'm going to. Even though this category was "emptied out of process", I'm going to remove the CFD tag for a discussion (on the wrong day) that didn't include this category and instead tag it for speedy deletion, CSD C1. Please do not do this with other categories, just go through the regular process of filing for a new CFD discussion. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:18, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that you created this category. So, since you tagged it for a CFD, I assume that you want it deleted, so I'm just going to delete it now as a CSD G7. I hope that is okay. If you want it restored, just let me know. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:20, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so sorry about that. I tried. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 23:36, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ernsanchez00!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ernsanchez00,

I've noticed that some of your category changes to articles are being reverted by User:Giovanni 0331. To avoid any possible edit-wars in the future, it might be wise to start a discussion with the other editor on your differing interpretations on what categories regarding sexual orientation and sexual identity (along with occcupation) are appropriate. I've tagged them so they are aware of my suggestion. Some times, it's easier to hash things out on a User talk page rather than edit at cross-purposes. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:27, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, that made sense. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 01:29, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also on categories, I see that you have quite arbitrarily recategorised a very large number of people identified in their articles as British to "English" in their categories. Most recently moving people described as "British actors" to English actor categories, but there are hundreds of them in your edit history and I have only reverted the recent ones. You should be aware that whether or not someone is described as British, or English/Welsh/Scottish/Irish, is established - as set out in the MoS - according to reliable sources also taking account of any personal preference expressed by the subject - and changes between them are specifically deprecated unless this is done on the back of reliable citation. Your shifting individuals from British to English categories, based on no argumentation or citation or consensus, where their articles use the British moniker is unacceptable, disruptive editing - All of these changes need to be undone by you, please (or reported). Thank you in anticipation MapReader (talk) 07:55, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MapReader, so sorry about that, I didn't know that. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 07:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So what made you think you can decide that someone described in their article as British is suddenly English? Many of your changes are BLPs and what you have done is clearly wrong. MapReader (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I honestly did. I just want it to be specific that's all. I know I made a huge mistake about this. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 08:58, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be like recategorising all American actors as Californian actors, on the basis of no evidence at all. Please undo all of your British to English changes, to avoid my having to report a major BLP breach on ANI. Thank you in anticipation. MapReader (talk) 09:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that makes sense. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 11:12, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Threats are not helpful, MapReader. You can get across your point without suggesting that you'll take an editor to ANI. All editors are in a process of improving and getting better. It helps to ask a lot of questions if you are unsure and know your limits. For example, I'm unfamiliar with templates and files so I only handle them if an editor whom I recognize knows them well asks me to take action on their behalf. And no one comes to Wikipedia understanding WP:MOS! Ernsanchez00, I appreciate your openness to editors coming here and correcting some of your editing decisions. That's not always the case. But if you want to be editing Wikipedia long-term, it's important to be able to listen to criticism, consider whether or not it is accurate and, if it is, change your behavior. I've been editing for over 10 years and I still get these kinds of messages. It's part of working on a collaborative editing project. We are all in the process of improving our knowledge. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:20, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Chinese transgender male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:13, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian transgender male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian transgender actresses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:14, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Australian transgender male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Australian transgender actresses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:15, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ernsanchez00,

You might be correct about these categories, I haven't looked into the subject. But if you find an editor consistently undoing your editing, it's best to go to their User talk page and talk about your differences and rather than getting frustrated. "Me vs. You" situations can lead to animosity and edit wars which is not good for the project. Just a suggestion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:23, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American expatriate male actors in England has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Largoplazo (talk) 11:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian bisexual actresses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:20, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Italian bisexual male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:New Zealand bisexual actresses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:21, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ernsanchez00,

If you are not going to contest these deletions, do you want to tag them CSD G7, delete at the request of the page creator? Just thought I'd ask. Have a good weekend. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ernsanchez00,

It looks like you were not notified about other gender-based categories you created that had become empty and were tagged for CSD C1 speedy deletion. Since you indicated on those you knew about that you wanted to delete them, I deleted the others as well. If you want them restored and you think that they will not be empty, feel free to restore them or I can do that for you. Let me know if you have any issues with me doing this. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:55, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:French bisexual male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:French bisexual actresses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:39, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:American transgender male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Transgender male actors by nationality indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American comedians of Dutch descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 03:54, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. As you may have noticed, I have reverted most of your edits regarding bisexual and transgender actors and emptied some of your category pages. The reason I have been doing this is to prevent over-subcategorising the article pages and some of these category pages contain less than five subjects. I apologise for not giving you earlier notice. What I feel the best option would have been is to create these individual categories. Example: Category:French bisexual men and Category:French bisexual actors. I hope you are alright with me reverting your edits.

Giovanni 0331 (talk) 16:52, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Giovanni 0331, not a problem. I'm fine with you reverting my edits about the category pages you discussing me about. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, I agree with Giovanni on this. I recommend only making categories where there are more than 5 people. I've nominated some of the Queer actress categories for the same reason. Mason (talk) 01:52, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American comedians of European descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American comedians of British descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American comedians of Welsh descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American comedians of Scottish descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American comedians of English descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:43, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American comedians of French descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American comedians of German descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American comedians of Italian descent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 18:44, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Finnish bisexual male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:English queer actresses has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:British queer actresses has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:South African bisexual male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that you've added speedy rename tags to several categories, such as Category:Actors by city or town in England. However, it seems like you haven't actually added the request to speedy. The final step is described in the template:

Add entry * Category:Actors by city or town in England to Category:English actors by populated place – Reason ~ ~ ~ ~

Mason (talk) 01:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, sorry about that. I forgot. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 02:02, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. It's an easy step to miss. I've definitely done it myself. :) Mason (talk) 02:28, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian bisexual male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:58, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian bisexual actresses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:59, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask why you keep adding categories related to Wandsworth to Nish Kumar? There is nothing in the article to suggest he is from Wandsworth, so this is original research. Please don't add categories that are not supported by the article body. Thanks, Opolito (talk) 18:11, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem. I apologized about that. But Tooting is one of the areas in London Borough of Wandsworth so I put the category of Actors from the London Borough of Wandsworth, so I read the article of Kumar saying that he was born in Tooting. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 18:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Spanish bisexual male actors indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:French transgender actresses indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Ernsanchez00, I've noticed that you have a tendency to just write "fixed" in edit summary boxes. This is never a sufficient explanation for an edit, as it doesn't help other editors understand your motives or reasons. On the pages The Cleaning Lady (American TV series) and Bliss (2018 TV series), for example, you removed categories and simply wrote "fixed", as if that in any way explained the deletions—it doesn't. Please either do a better job summarizing your edits, or stop removing content from articles without a good reason. Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 22:38, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my apologies for the oversight. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 22:41, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm disappointed to see that we have to go over this again. First of all, writing misleading edit summaries is not an "oversight", it's either neglect or deception. Second, even though you've improved your edit summaries a little, they are still inadequate. Why are you removing categories from television articles?! Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 06:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because I tried to type the reason for the edit, but I'm not too sure why I typed the reason for my edit so I typed, "Remove the category". So you're right, I did something wrong. :( Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 06:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get the sense that you are taking my concerns seriously. Can you please explain why you insist on removing categories from certain television articles? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 07:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For me, I removed the categories from television articles It's mainly because for example, when I added "Fox Broadcasting Company television dramas" for Cleaning Lady, the category of "Fox Broadcasting Company original programming" remained the same, so that's why I removed the category of "Fox Broadcasting Company original programming". Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 08:06, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you mean the Fox Broadcasting Company television dramas subcategory is within the Fox Broadcasting Company original programming category, and thus the latter is redundant, right? Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 09:12, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 09:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, now it makes sense—thanks for explaining. Next time, you can just write "already in subcat" as an edit summary :) Revirvlkodlaku (talk) 09:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, no problem. I should write it "already in subcat" as an edit summary as well instead of "fixed". :) Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 09:54, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Japanese comedians by city has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:New Zealand comedians by city has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Russian comedians by city has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 01:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed you are adding a lot of people on this page that aren't comedians. A comedian is defined as someone whose work or specialty is primarily defined by comedy, whether it's standup, sketch, improv, or the amount of films/TV that are comedy is 80% or greater. You've been adding actors who don't qualify as comedians so I'm removing some of your edits to make sure it's complying with the definition of comedian. Please try and focus on other pages to edit rather than this page for the time being. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivianboy9834 (talk • contribs) 18:33, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my apologies about that. Thank you. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 20:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, it seems like you have completely no idea of what you're doing and just adding random people to the list of comedians wiki page, which because of you it's completely expanding and just becoming a list of people. I'm going to ask you very nicely to stop editing the page and I'll remove some people you added to the page. It's going to make it much more difficult to parse through since there are so many names. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rivianboy9834 (talk • contribs) 03:46, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Universities Canada has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 20:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Musicians from the London Borough of Sutton indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you emptying out "Musicians from ____" categories to get them speedy deleted? ★Trekker (talk) 22:58, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, my apologies about that. I just emptied out the categories to make it to the "Musicians by London borough" to change it. For example: From "Musicians to Westminster" to "Musicians from the City of Westminster." Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 23:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see. It would be best to use the old categories as parent categories in that case.★Trekker (talk) 01:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, that will do. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 02:21, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you forget to add these nominations to Categories for Discussion? You added the template to the category pages but I can't find the nomination anywhere. Sionk (talk) 19:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, my apologies. I forgot to add these nominations to Categories for Discussion. Thank you for asking. I think I did it right. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 19:13, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Jerry Levine, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 15:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, no problem, I apologized for that. Thank you for clarification. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 15:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Actors from Georgia (U.S. State) by county indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:35, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Television personalities from the City of Westminster indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:47, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from London by borough has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:22, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Barnet has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Bexley has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Brent has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:23, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Bromley has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Camden has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Croydon has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Ealing has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:24, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Enfield has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the Royal Borough of Greenwich has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Hackney has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:25, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Haringey has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Harrow has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Havering has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Hillingdon has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:26, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Hounslow has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Islington has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:27, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Lambeth has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Lewisham has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Merton has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Newham has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:28, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Redbridge has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Richmond upon Thames has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Southwark has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Tower Hamlets has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Waltham Forest has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:29, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the London Borough of Wandsworth has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Models from the City of Westminster has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Omnis Scientia (talk) 13:30, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi just giving you a heads up,

Early this year you added some categories to Mari Takahashi, when it was a redirect to Smosh.

I have turned the article into a disambiguation page because there's another human named Mari Takahashi that I was trying to look up (a voice actress involved in Loner Life in Another World), and I was terribly confused when I landed on Smosh. A consequence of the page no longer being a redirect is that some of the information you added to the page via categories become "lost" because Mariko "Mari" Takahashi doesn't have her own page. The only thing I salvaged from the categories is the birth year. 2601:645:8A00:F70:E838:84A4:3C5F:7D7E (talk) 12:24, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Are you aware of this discussion from earlier this year ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2024_March_11#People_from_London_by_locality_and_occupation Please cease creating these Artists or Painters by borough category as they serve no useful purpose. 14GTR (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. And I apologize for that. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 17:22, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with @14GTR: and am disappointed to see that after agreeing to stop you did this. Please not only stop, but go back and revert the overly-specific categories that you have added across dozens of articles. Opolito (talk) 17:58, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Painters from the London Borough of Hounslow indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:56, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Painters from the London Borough of Brent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Painters from the Royal Borough of Greenwich indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artists from the London Borough of Wandsworth indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Painters from the London Borough of Southwark indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:59, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Painters from the London Borough of Hackney indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:25, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Politicians from the London Borough of Bromley indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Painters from the London Borough of Lewisham indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artists from the Royal Borough of Greenwich indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 12:03, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sculptors from the London Borough of Ealing indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:27, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Netflix television dramas has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. 98𝚃𝙸𝙶𝙴𝚁𝙸𝚄𝚂 • [𝚃𝙰𝙻𝙺] 13:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Sculptors from London by borough indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artists from the London Borough of Lewisham indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:47, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

As in this edit, you have made a whole series of changes to websites for schools. Where are you getting the data and how are you figuring out that some of the links to websites in school articles needed to be updated? Alansohn (talk) 02:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alansohn,

I figured it out while getting the data by putting the new links of each school website that exists so I put them in each infobox since the old websites each have an error page. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 10:31, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artists from the London Borough of Brent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Photographers from the London Borough of Enfield indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artists from the London Borough of Merton indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 15:00, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artists from the London Borough of Enfield indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:27, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Artists from the London Borough of Harrow indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and removing the speedy deletion tag. ✗plicit 14:16, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Luke Wilson, you may be blocked from editing. You not only have been talked to before about inappropriate additions of categories, but I see earlier this year you were specifically talked to about adding "comedian" categories where they weren't warranted. You need to slow down and think more carefully about whether the addition of a category is truly merited. DonIago (talk) 05:40, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I apologized about that, I will make sure I will read and double check everything before adding the categories. Ernestine Sanchez (talk) 18:21, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:28, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]