User talk:Noble Attempt

Hi Noble Attempt! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! :Jay8g [V•T•E] 05:49, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Broc (talk) 17:59, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Chang'e 6, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:41, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Incidents during the Hajj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jordanian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick work on the 2024 Bolivian coup d'état attempt article. If I may offer just one suggestion, it is to follow the WP:OPCOORD precision guidelines regarding coordinates. For example, to point to Plaza Murillo, the guideline suggests a level of precision to the arcsecond, as I have just done for the article. Thanks again, Abductive (reasoning) 22:00, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the advice and for the positive words, I'll be sure to follow those guidelines in the future. Noble Attempt (talk) 22:06, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 27 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Bolivian coup d'état attempt, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 00:38, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 28 June 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Aricell battery factory fire, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page.  — Amakuru (talk) 11:11, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 July 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article ChinaAngVirus disinformation campaign, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the United States Department of Defense ran a propaganda campaign against Chinese vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/ChinaAngVirus disinformation campaign. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, ChinaAngVirus disinformation campaign), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 17,328 views (722.0 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of July 2024 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:27, 2 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Jung-gu car crash has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Broc (talk) 21:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, I have fully noted your message and its information.

Thank you for the notice, I will make sure to be much more vigilant in checking sure my language and edits do not match the sources I use. Noble Attempt (talk) 23:41, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noble Attempt. Thank you for your work on Kobayashi red yeast rice scandal. Another editor, Broc, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Nice translation work!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 12:36, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2024 Seoul car crash has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet notability criteria

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Seoul car crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Seoul car crash (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ktkvtsh (talk) 21:06, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Pachu Kannan (talk) 19:09, 11 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2024 peace missions by Viktor Orbán has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I believe the article needs to go for two reasons:

(1) The article subject is not independently notable. Foreign trips are an absolutely routine matter for prime ministers. Since Orbán undertook those trips as a prime minister of Hungary, they can be mentioned in Fifth Orbán Government. So, it would be either a delete or a merge and redirect.

(2) These trips had nothing to do with peacekeeping; the term "peace mission" has been solely a propaganda term in this case. Wikipedia should not lend credibility to this propaganda endeavour by having a dedicated article with such a title.

Overall, I see no reason for Wikipedia to have a separate article on Orban's four foreigns trips, additionally under such a misleading title.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — kashmīrī ^TALK 13:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted, thank you.

I changed the page name to "2024 visits by Viktor Orbán to Russia and China" and clarified that clarified that the term "peace missions" was only used by Orbán and that the meetings were widely seen as attempts to appease Russia's rogue and expansionist government instead of resisting their policies and breaches of international law. I used the term "peace missions" in the title because it was inclusive of Orban's attempts to try and quiet the war on his own terms instead of coinciding with Ukraine, the EU and NATO, and I changed it since I see how it is misrepresentative of the actual nature of the visits without reading the full article.

I also made sure to emphasize in the main paragraph Orbán's rogue nature in planning the meetings and their notability in using the EU's rotating presidency to speak on behalf of the EU against their values and positions towards Russia's invasion of Ukraine and China's partnership.

I will make sure to redirect mentions of the old "peace missions" title on other articles. Please let me know if any other suggestions or issues are associated with the article. Noble Attempt (talk) 18:15, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Biden's July 2024 press conference is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Biden's July 2024 press conference until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Muboshgu (talk) 14:54, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 visits by Viktor Orbán to Russia and China is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 visits by Viktor Orbán to Russia and China until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

— kashmīrī ^TALK 21:13, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Russian collective guilt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Mellk (talk) 05:33, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Manila Bay oil spill Philippines greatest oil tragedy Good Job

Valenzuela400 (talk) 09:22, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your name caught my eye. Just wanted to say I like it! Rather than paste you another kitten and have you one day need to deal with what can happen when two kittens grow up, enough said; cheers! InedibleHulk (talk) 01:20, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Are you sure about including in the Current Events info about Hungary on 27 July? I do not find other sources that would support that. And to be honest in your source there does not seem to be the 27 date, but 25... :P IHaveBecauseOfLocks (talk) 06:42, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for catching that! That was an oversight on my part, I will change it now. Noble Attempt (talk) 07:04, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, though I would be still happy to get another source confirming this interesting event. IHaveBecauseOfLocks (talk) 07:35, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I changed the current event date to July 9 based on Hungarian webpages. Some of the sources I found:

Bmbah.hu Pénzcentrum Helpers.hu Helpers.hu 24.hu Noble Attempt (talk) 17:31, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I am not familiar with Hungarian though eh. :P But oh good that some of these Hungarian ones are translated. Strange that the only English page that seemed to bother was Wikipedia. Good work then is done here I suppose. In Polish I have found one page that was done just after you posted the info here xd. https://oko.press/na-zywo/na-zywo-relacja/wegry-wpuszcza-do-ue-tysiace-rosjan-i-bialorusinow IHaveBecauseOfLocks (talk) 21:15, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like we have two articles about this topic now. July 2024 Israeli attack on Beirut and 2024 Haret Hreik airstrike which was created around half hour before yours. Do you think I should redirect yours and apply some of your info to the other? (I've seen it where two users fought about being then "original creator" of an article. I hope this wont be as complicated lol) Prodrummer619 (talk) 20:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am all good with you turning my article into a redirect with added info to the other article if the other article on the topic was created first. Thank you for asking! Noble Attempt (talk) 20:56, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Effects of Hurricane Debby in Florida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No consensus for split.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.IrishSurfer21 (talk) 22:07, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great to hear your opinion at Talk:2024 Turkey wildfires#Proposal to merge all years into Wildfires in Turkey Chidgk1 (talk) 07:53, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Gaza Strip polio epidemic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Gaza Strip polio epidemic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hydromania (talk) 03:44, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noble Attempt. Thank you for your work on Jizera Dark-Sky Park. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

I really enjoyed learning about this dark-sky preserve. Thanks for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 15:41, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noble Attempt. Thank you for your work on Riffian independence movement. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 14:51, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noble Attempt,

Thank you for creating 2024 European heatwaves.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice article, but there is a table of highest temperatures that seems to have no sources? thanks

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Aszx5000}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Aszx5000 (talk) 15:25, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article and for your feedback! It seems like a separate user without a username added the table without sources, so I will see if I can find a comprehensive source or individual sources for the chart figures, and if I can not I will remove it for now. Once again, thank you! Noble Attempt (talk) 18:41, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Israeli public diplomacy in the Israel–Hamas war, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A missing title error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 23:36, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for creating Israeli public diplomacy in the Israel–Hamas war! I've marked it as reviewed. Cheers, '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 01:14, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Arrest of Pavel Durov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrest of Pavel Durov until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

GenevieveDEon (talk) 23:28, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noble Attempt. Thank you for your work on German Taurus controversy. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 17:20, 2 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Hurricane John (2024), which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Noble Attempt/sandbox/Hurricane John (2024) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Noble Attempt! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:55, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2024 Chicago White Sox's 121st loss has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NSPORTSEVENT. One of 121 (so far) losses, nothing about the game itself is notable and what needs to be covered can be covered at 2024 Chicago White Sox season

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:33, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Chicago White Sox's 121st loss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Chicago White Sox's 121st loss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Muboshgu (talk) 14:15, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 September 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article 2024 Nepal floods, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 20:47, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

2024 Alabama vs. Vanderbilt football game, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bkissin (talk) 16:51, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 November 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article October 2024 Spain floods, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Stephen 02:40, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I won’t remove it (yet) as I don’t really feel keen on doing so without discussion, but I’m not really sure if the UN warning is the type of substantive news item/event that the CE portal is intended for - the UN makes many statements on many things, and this specific instance is effectively just reiterating a (terrible) situation that’s already been well-known and well-publicized by substantive events we’ve posted at CE beforehand. Do you think it’s necessary? The Kip ^(contribs) 23:04, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those are good points, I added the statement based on it being a UN statement and based on the very dire language used, but you are correct about it being repeated before in the current events section, especially with regards to the currently ongoing Siege of North Gaza. I have no issues with you removing the passage, and I greatly appreciate you discussing it with me prior to making any actions! Noble Attempt (talk) 19:44, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 3 November 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Novi Sad railway station canopy collapse, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Schwede66 04:20, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International reactions to the 2024 United States presidential election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International reactions to the 2024 United States presidential election until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:07, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noble Attempt. Thank you for your work on 2024 Indo-Pakistani smog. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:28, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for reviewing the article and for the kind words! I also wish you a great day! Noble Attempt (talk) 08:06, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2024 Idaho wildfires has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a single secondary source is reporting on these wildfires, only primary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of 1990s albums considered the best is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 1990s albums considered the best until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

JeffSpaceman (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noble Attempt. Thank you for your work on 2024–2025 floods in Southeast Asia and South Asia. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for writing the article! Have a blessed and wonderful days ahead!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:35, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see you wrote the page 2024 Alabama vs. Vanderbilt football game and was wondering if you could help me create and add to 2024 Georgia vs. Georgia Tech football game, and give me some helpful tips, as I have never written a page on a game. Butters (talk) 14:17, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for asking! I'd be happy to provide help towards the article.

I can first provide some sources that you can use for each section of the article, and a basic outline of how I usually incorporate them in. When I first start a game article, I usually begin with getting the play-by-play of the game and turning it into the Game Summary section. ESPN for the 1Q-4Q and OT [1][2] and Sports Reference for the Statistical summary [3] are usually my go to for this, with the ESPN Recap [4] as a good summary for which plays are specifically worth mentioning for the 1Q-4Q and OT sections. ESPN [5] also has info I generally use for the Attendance, Stadium, Referee, and Network sections for the Infobox college football game infobox at the beginning of the article.

I also go to the 2024 season team pages for each team involved, in this case the 2024 Georgia Tech Yellow Jackets football team or the 2024 Georgia Bulldogs football team pages for the Scoring summary. You can copy and paste it into the new article and mention the article you used in the edit summary. You can also use earlier game outcomes from the articles as part of the Background for each team, and also use paragraphs and sources from the Clean, Old-Fashioned Hate rivalry page for more context.

For the Main paragraph and Aftermath sections, make sure to mention the specific aspects of the game that are historic, including the game having the most OTs in history [6]. Here are some more sources describing player and coach reactions for the Aftermath section [7][8], and sports fan and media reactions [9][10][11]. For the specific team sections, The Sports Illustrated college-specific news sections are good with specific details about reactions from one team or the other: [12] for Georgia and [13][14] for Georgia Tech.

I'll see if I can add to the article in the next few days, and please let me know if I can better clarify anything I wrote here or is there's any other advice I can help with! Noble Attempt (talk) 06:12, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Chicago Bears–Detroit Lions Thanksgiving game is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Chicago Bears–Detroit Lions Thanksgiving game until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Hey man im josh (talk) 21:17, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date. You have shown interest in the Syrian Civil War and ISIL. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose contentious topics restrictions—such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks—on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, expected standards of behaviour, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

As a note, per these community-authorized general sanctions, there is a one-revert rule in place for all articles related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. This means that an editor in this area may make no more than one revert per article per 24 hour period, unless an obvious exception applies. Please let me know if you have any questions about this. — Red-tailed hawk _(nest) 04:12, 8 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2024 Al-Mustariha massacre, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2024 Al-Mustariha massacre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Noble Attempt! I came across your profile during some of your recent editing in regard to the Syrian conflict. I've been working on a big project over the last few weeks: Attacks on the United States. The aim is to have a list of every time the U.S. (government/military) was attacked, but not when the U.S. was attacking. My hope is to create attacks by the United States once this list is finished.

Well anyway, I wanted to see if you would be interested in helping me put together some of the summaries for the list. I am fairly sure most of the attacks themselves are on the list. But, I'm still working to get the summaries and references put together for each of them. If you are interested or have any questions, feel free to message me back here or on my talk page anytime! If not, I completely understand. Keep up the good work on Wikipedia! The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page) 04:33, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I would be happy to contribute to the article. I'd be very happy to work on summaries for the 1900–1945 section, but I would be open to contributing to any section, probably beginning 11 December whenever my in-person obligations are clear of my schedule. Thank you for reaching out, and I greatly appreciate your kind words! Noble Attempt (talk) 08:26, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I'm not sure how much experience you have at WP:GA but I wanted to ask if you'd considered nominating 2024 Alabama vs. Vanderbilt football game for GA status. I'd be more than willing to help out with the nomination if need be. From a glance, the quality definitely looks like it's there, and college football could always use more GAs! PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 21:53, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! This would be my first GA nomination, but I am more than happy to learn about WP:GA and nominate the article so I can work to help elevate it! And I would be extremely happy to receive assistance from you and anyone to help out with the article to improve it. I greatly appreciate you reaching out to ask me about it while offering info and assistance too. Noble Attempt (talk) 23:16, 13 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Noble Attempt, you recently created the article Russian occupation of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, though we already did at one point have an article on the subject, Russian occupation of Dnipropetrovsk and Poltava oblasts, which was intentionally merged into Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine per this consensus to merge. I would suggest at least providing some reasoning or opening a discussion to explain why we should recreate the article when nothing much has changed since then (Russian forces are somewhat close to the oblast but not inside it). Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I apologize, I was not aware of the earlier article being merged into the Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine while translating the recently-created es:Ocupación rusa del óblast de Dnipropetrovsk article from the Spanish Wikipedia.

That's my bad for being unaware, and I am ok with moving the article to draftspace or for speedy deletion if need be and cleaning up links I added to other pages, since you are correct that it is probably unnecessary to recreate the article when Russian forces haven't re-encroached on the oblast. Noble Attempt (talk) 00:58, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Noble Attempt,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Russian occupation of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast for deletion, because it's a redirect from an article title to a namespace that's not for articles.

If you don't want Russian occupation of Dnipropetrovsk Oblast to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

C F A 01:26, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Noble Attempt. Thank you for your work on 2024 Russian botulism outbreak. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thank you for creating the article! May you have a blessed day on the beginning of this year!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 00:49, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2025 Fullerton plane crash, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2025 Fullerton plane crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Wildfire Barnstar
	Great work on January 2025 Southern California wildfires! Glad to see another wildfire editor. (Barnstar design shamelessly stolen from User:EF5) Wildfireupdateman (talk)

+1. Was not expecting Wildfires in January, but mother Earth doesn't run on an agenda. :) E_F⁵ 20:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much! I greatly appreciate it given how significant an event it is and with how many different aspects there are to cover, which makes me very grateful for the help with reverting unfitting or vandalizing edits, @EF5. I'm also super grateful for the work of @Wildfireupdateman's on the talk page, since making sure things are running smoothly with all the other articles on the individual fires involved helps greatly, and I appreciate the time and effort it takes you to work with several editors together. Noble Attempt (talk) 01:43, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You should wait until the discussion was closed before moving the article Arrest of Yoon Suk Yeol. I will not be reverting the move, but just so you know in the future that this is against Wikipedia guidelines. Thanks. Sahaib (talk) 09:21, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize, I will be sure to do so going forward. Thank you for letting me know. Noble Attempt (talk) 09:22, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism And Restoring Biological Truth To The Federal Government requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Perfect4th (talk) 06:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]